25 Years Later White Schoolgirl is Finally Avenged as Black Rapist Pays with His Life

Kansas City
February 27, 2014

Ann Harrison The rest of the city may remember her as the girl kidnapped from in front of her house while waiting for the school bus.
But to her friends, who have grown into women with careers and children of their own, she is forever in their thoughts as that smiling, pretty, brown-haired girl who loved softball and music.

A federal judge on Monday denied four motions for a stay of execution filed by a convicted Kansas City killer who is scheduled to be put to death early Wednesday.

The motions filed on behalf of Michael Taylor raised four different issues that defense attorneys said merited a halt to the execution. Taylor is scheduled to die by lethal injection at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday for the 1989 kidnapping, rape and murder of 15-year-old Ann Harrison.

Attorneys for Taylor immediately filed notice Monday morning that they will appeal the rulings to the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Later Monday afternoon, they filed a new request with the 8th Circuit for a stay of execution.

Taylor’s lawyers then filed another motion for a stay of execution with the Missouri Supreme Court. The attorneys said that stay request should be granted because Taylor has a pending motion asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider his case.

Michael Taylor was due to meet his maker at 12.01 Wednsday.

One of the stays denied Monday by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips was sought for the same reasons. Taylor and other Missouri death-row inmates are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider issues surrounding Missouri’s lethal-injection protocol.

However, Phillips ruled Monday that in order to grant the stay, Taylor would have to show there is a “reasonable probability” that the Supreme Court would take the case. She ruled that Taylor had not made that showing.

She also denied Taylor’s stay request based on the argument that the state’s recent employment of a new pharmacy to supply the lethal-injection drug changes the state’s written protocol and violates his right to due process.

Phillips ruled that the state may have changed the pharmacy but that did not constitute a change in the protocol. Again, as with the Supreme Court issue, she found that Taylor had not shown there was a likelihood he would prevail in the case.

Read More

Leave a Reply