Alyssa Milano’s #SexStrike is an Admission That Women are All Prostitutes, Fundamentally

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
May 14, 2019

In response to what she views as overly restrictive abortion laws in several Midwestern and Southern states, former actress Alyssa Milano has announced that she will not be having sex until the laws are changed.


Actress and #MeToo activist Alyssa Milano has urged women to take part in a “sex strike” to protest against a new abortion law in the state of Georgia.

“Until women have legal control over our own bodies we just cannot risk pregnancy,” she tweeted.

Georgia is the latest state to enact legislation restricting abortion.

Ms Milano’s tweet divided opinion on social media, sparking a debate that led to the #SexStrike hashtag trending on Twitter in the US.

The so-called “heartbeat” bill, which was signed by Governor Brian Kemp on Tuesday, is scheduled to come into effect on 1 January.

This is hilarious on a number of different levels.

Firstly, no one in Georgia or Ohio is going to suffer because she isn’t having sex with her husband. The only person who is going to suffer from that is her husband. And her husband has no direct ability to influence legislation in any state, especially in states in which he does not live. She and her chubby hubby, David Bugliari, live in California, where abortion laws are more liberal than in any other place on earth.

Over a decade younger than his harpy, this poor fat bastard has become a martyr of the persecution of men.

Secondly, she is implying that she may want to murder a child that her husband inseminates her with. It is certainly unlikely that she is going to get pregnant through natural means, given that she is 46 years old, but if by some miracle she does, she wants her husband to understand that she may choose to murder the child.

Most hilarious however is this: by saying that she and other women will deprive men of sex as a way to force them to do something for her and other women, she is openly admitting that sex is a commodity that women trade for personal gain. That is to say, she is admitting that all women are de facto prostitutes who exchange sex for things they want from men.

Although I’m sure she is not self-aware enough to realize this implication, it would be fantastic if women and men alike began openly recognizing the reality that her weird blackmail scheme reveals.

Women do have “sexual needs.” But these needs are significantly lower than those of men, due to women’s significantly lower levels of testosterone. Furthermore, it is very easy for women to seduce men. If a man thinks he can get away with sex with a woman who is less attractive than him without anyone knowing about it, he will do it in most situations. Thus, a woman can effectively have sex with men much more attractive than she is (within reason) whenever she wants in order to meet her sexual needs. However, such a sexual encounter is unlikely to gain her anything, beyond fulfillment of her already relatively low sexual needs.

As such, women will most often choose to trade sex – their singular commodity – for various things they desire. This is literally the only logical thing a woman is capable of working out. And it isn’t really logic, so much as instinct.

Traditionally, this all worked out very well. Women would trade sex to men in exchange for marriage, which amounts to a man making a lifetime commitment to care for a woman materially. Admittedly, men are on the short end of this deal, but it kept society stable. The species continued and people were generally happy.

Now, however, the state will steal money from men and give it to any woman who does not have a man to care for her, both through welfare and by forcing private companies to hire women for jobs they are incapable of performing, so the incentive to trade sex for a marriage contract no longer exists. As such, most women now choose to spend a good portion of their youth engaging in the kind of sex described above: sex with men who are more attractive than them, who would never marry them but will spend a few hours with them if there are no strings attached.

They also choose to use sex or the unfulfilled promise of sex for the purpose of manipulating men in order to fulfill their personal goals in the workplace or elsewhere. Eventually, a woman’s sexual marketplace value begins to decline, and she looks for a man with a higher-than-average income to pay for her life.

This is a basic bitch manosphere analysis of the life arc of the average modern Western woman, but it is nonetheless very accurate.

The bottom line is that women trade in sex because it is the only commodity of any value they have to trade.

Women are:

  • Not interesting
  • Not entertaining
  • Boring
  • Stupid
  • Not good at anything
  • Not knowledgeable or skilled in any field
  • Annoying
  • Irate
  • Egotistical and self-centered
  • Emotionally unsound
  • Vindictive
  • Lacking in any form of morality
  • Incapable of contemplation or self-analysis
  • Incapable of caring for others

They have literally nothing to contribute to society.

As Schopenhauer wrote in “On Women” all those years ago:

Only a male intellect clouded by the sexual drive could call the stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped and short-legged sex the fair sex: for it is with this drive that all its beauty is bound up. More fittingly than the fair sex, women could be called the unaesthetic sex. Neither for music, nor poetry, nor the plastic arts do they possess any real feeling or receptivity: if they affect to do so, it is merely mimicry in service of their effort to please. This comes from the fact that they are incapable of taking a purely objective interest in anything whatever, and the reason for this is, I think, as follows. Man strives in everything for a direct domination over things, either by comprehending or by subduing them. But woman is everywhere and always relegated to a merely indirect domination, which is achieved by means of man, who is consequently the only thing she has to dominate directly. Thus it lies in the nature of women to regard everything simply as a means of capturing a man, and their interest in anything else is only simulated, is no more than a detour, i.e. amounts to coquetry and mimicry.

Modern society has created a gigantic illusion that they are contributing through various affirmative action and welfare programs, but anyone who steps back for even a minute and surveys the situation will recognize that they are worthless.

Women exist purely for the purposes of sex and reproduction, and for assisting men in menial tasks, such as picking fruit, cooking meat and washing clothing. Modern technology has made most of their functions obsolete. And yet there they are in the workplace, doing nothing, looking confused, getting in men’s way, making outrageous demands.

Alyssa Milano’s protest draws attention to the fact that women’s only real commodity is sex, and the sooner we all admit that her instincts here are correct, the sooner we can get back to a stable society, where families are strong and children are raised in a safe and healthy environment ruled over by a masculine father.