Black Jewish Homosexual Jussie Smollett Did Not Want Due Process for Brett Kavanaugh

Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
February 25, 2019

Jussie Smollett was against due process for Brett Kavanaugh but now wants due process for himself. It doesn’t get much more Jewish than this.

Last year, the black Jewish homosexual Jussie Smollett basically said that Brett Kavanaugh did not deserve the presumption of innocence when he was falsely accused of sex crimes. At the height of the Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation process, he posted a tweet saying that he believed all the nonsense from Christine Blasey-Ford and the other lying skanks.

Of course now that Smollett has been charged with orchestrating a hoax attack against himself, he and his legal team are demanding the presumption of innocence and due process. This despite the fact that there is lots of evidence that he engineered the hoax attack and no evidence that Kavanaugh did any of those alleged sex crimes. The hypocrisy of this has not gone unnoticed and has even been written about in mainstream circles.

Fox News:

Jussie Smollett’s legal team asked that the “Empire” actor be given the “presumption of innocence” after he was charged with faking his own hate attack, but one columnist pointed out that the star had no problem rushing to judgment during the confirmation of then-Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

Following three weeks of mounting suspicions, Smollett, who is accused of filing a false police report, was charged Wednesday with felony disorderly conduct. He turned himself in at central booking early Thursday. If convicted, he is facing up to three years in prison and Chicago police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said during a fiery press conference that Smollett orchestrated a “phony attack” in order to take “advantage of the pain and anger of racism to promote his career” and hopefully get a pay raise.

Mediaite’s Julio Rosas penned an opinion piece on Thursday headlined, “Jussie Smollett Wants Presumption of Innocence…Though He Didn’t Give Brett Kavanaugh Benefit of the Doubt.” Rosas pointed to a statement from Smollett’s legal team that declared, “Like any other citizen, Mr. Smollett enjoys the presumption of innocence.”

But the outspoken actor tweeted that he believed Christine Blasey Ford, who famously accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault decades ago when they were in high school — and the hypocrisy didn’t go unnoticed by the Mediaite columnist.

“Smollett, however, had a different approach during the confirmation of then-Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh when he was accused of serious sexual misconduct without hard evidence,” Rosas wrote. “The main difference is that Kavanaugh was not on trial, but the idea of innocent until proven guilty still remains the same.”

Putting Smolett’s hypocrisy aside, it is worth noting that the Jewish media has regularly pushed the narrative that White males are “guilty until proven innocent” and that black Jewish homosexuals like Smollett deserve the presumption of innocence.

The facts and evidence of each situation are not relevant to media Jews because they view these incidents through the lens of race. Kavanaugh was declared guilty by the Jewish media because he was a White male and a moderate conservative who was about to obtain a seat on the Supreme Court. Smollett on the other hand was given every benefit of the doubt even though many people including blacks were calling him out for hoaxing the attack from the start.

The same thing that happened with Kavanaugh happened with Nick Sandmann. They immediately declared Sandmann guilty of racially harassing an injun man using a short video clip that was taken out of context. They were so eager to destroy a White male that they completely ignored the basic facts of the situation. And that’s why Sandmann has since filed a $250 million lawsuit against the Washington Post.

All of this reveals the thought process motivating these Jews. They’re perfectly fine with slandering and destroying White males using hoaxes and lies. But when there’s real evidence that they or one of their colored pets did something wrong, they lecture us about the Constitution, presumption of innocence and due process.

Join the discussion at TGKBBS