Diversity Macht Frei
January 14, 2017
Here we have the Counterjewhad on the attack against the movement for European survival.
Theodore Shoebat interviews (link) Martin Sellner, a leader of the German and Austrian identitarian movement. Shoebat runs the anti-Islam website Shoebat.com so Sellner begins the interview assuming he is talking to an ally and that they are going to discuss the islamisation and Afro-Asian immvasion of Europe. But Shoebat is not an ally. He is an Arab whose “Palestinian”* father converted to Christianity and later pledged to “fight for the Jewish people”(link). It’s noteworthy that Shoebat, in the title of his article, bills Sellner as “Europe’s Alt Right Neo-Nazi” leader. This is, of course, hilarious and inaccurate in a number of respects but it is revealing that the Counterjewhad movement now feels it has to attack what it perceives to be the Alt Right.**
Shoebat had obviously prepared an ambush interview in which he would obsessively raise a number of bizarre points about oblique references he had found on the identitarian movement websites. He spends almost the entire hour-plus interview forcing Sellner to response to petty points about the sexual perversions of the Japanese novelist Mishima, Samurai and paganism.
At 54 minutes, he raises the Jewish Question, based on a quote from Guillaume Faye. “Do you subscribe to this idea that the Jews are behind the mass immigration?” Sellner backs down. “No, not at all. I think that’s the wrong idea.” Shoebat continues to press the point, citing the fact that Guillaume Faye once shared a stage with “former-KKK” member David Duke at an American Renaissance conference.
What this illustrates is the truth of a point I made myself many years before when understanding dawned on me: that the Counterjewhad movement can never be the vehicle for a movement for European survival. In its deprecation of European ethnic interests and ancestral identity, its practice of issuing “anathemas” to people to have “incorrect” thoughts, its elevation of anti-democratic universalism in the ideal of human rights, and its obsessive philosemitism, it is simply not “fit for purpose” in that regard. It is part of the problem; not the solution.
Europeans are desperately flailing around for something that will allow their way of life to survive in the face of immigration-driven islamisation. Many of them, particularly English speakers, have latched on to the Counterjihad movement as expressive of at least some of their interests and concerns. But this movement, the Counterjewhad movement, as I call it, is overwhelmingly run, financed and orchestrated by Jews. Even the Gentiles who are part of it feel the need to conform to the Jewish agenda, on pain of exclusion and anathema. Fundamentally, this movement is hostile to European civilisation. European patriots who join it, invest in it, or allow their thinking to be shaped by it, are embracing their own destruction as a people.
*In his book “The Invention of the Jewish People”, Israeli historian Shlomo Sand makes the point that the so-called Palestinians are largely ethnic Jews who converted to Islam following the Arab conquest (link).
**If this web page is accurate, Shoebat is more of a fringe figure in the Counterjewhad than I thought at first. In fact, he seems as wacky as Muslims on many issues. He comes across as a bit like a Christian jihadi, if that makes any sense.