June 26, 2019
The new Project Veritas report about Google censorship has been censored by Google. Because of course.
The 25 minute video, above, is available only on Vimeo, a crappy YouTube knock-off that no one uses.
Previously, Vimeo would ban anyone that YouTube banned, so having a home there is only very temporary.
It is just incredible how quickly tech companies moved from “well, we just don’t think that literal NAZIS should have the same rights as everyone else” to “anyone who supports Donald Trump, is against abortion, is a Christian or reports on our own corruption is banned.”
Talk about a slippery slope. This is like the world’s steepest Slip ‘N Slide.
It hasn’t even been two whole years since I was banned from everything, and now basic Republicans are getting banned for talking about people getting banned.
Project Veritas summarizes the video:
- Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”
- Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”
- Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”
- Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”
- LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable”
- Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
- Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230
It’s mostly stuff we already knew, but it is good to see it admitted, yet again.
But as I say: the most incredible part is that Google is now banning reporting on their censorship agenda. A Congressman, Louie Gohmert (R-TX), came out and commented on this video – and then they deleted it!
This video shows Google’s biases are now a threat to a free and fair election, all while they hide behind the immunity given by Congress years ago when they were supposed to be a simple ‘town square’ where everyone’s voice could be heard without biased results. In fact, Google references a significant role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections. This discovery should set off alarm bells throughout the country. It is no secret that Google has a political agenda. Multiple brave tech insiders have stepped forward and exposed Google’s censorship of content and specialized algorithms. This media giant’s ‘social justice narrative’ should distress all Americans who value a free and open society. Google should not be deciding whether content is important or trivial and they most assuredly should not be meddling in our election process. They need their immunity stripped and to be properly pursued by class action lawsuits by those they have knowingly harmed.
Of course, he’s the only one saying it.
The overwhelming majority of conservaniggers hide behind libertarianism, saying that the “rights of a private company” to not be regulated by the government are more important than the Constitution.
Reporting on the Veritas video, Tucker went hard on the Republicans for refusing to do anything about this censorship last night. He’s just flown in to Tokyo, so he’s a little bit off-kilter, but he makes all of our exact points.
The idea you would be a Republican and allow Republicans to be completely cleansed from the internet because… because your ideology says that you have to do that… is deranged. It’s a suicide ideology, meaning it isn’t a good ideology.
If your ideology says you have to lose, you need to change your ideology.
Libertarianism was nonsensical from the beginning, and hasn’t actually accomplished anything. It is just a goofy baby boomer thing that gained popularity during the 1980s, and is still lingering around the Republican Party, even whilst the government is bigger than at any point in history.
And this is 100% selective libertarianism. No single conservanigger is going to come out against the Civil Rights Act, even though telling family-owned private businesses and community schools that they have to serve black people is a whole helluva lot bigger in terms of regulation than telling the most powerful companies that have ever existed that they’re not allowed to manipulate election outcomes.
And as Tucker says: THE WHITE HOUSE ITSELF HAS THE ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT TECH REGULATIONS.
They are not doing it.