Everyone Who Accused Kavanaugh is Recanting as Grassley Brings Down the Hammer

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 4, 2018

The Democrats made a gamble when they decided to come out with the talking point that you have to believe all women, even when they’re obviously lying.

That gamble has not paid off, and people are probably angry that it is now a matter of public record that all of these whores were making up these claims against the honorable Justice Kavanaugh.

USA Today:

Just days before the midterm elections, Sen. Chuck Grassley asked the federal authorities on Friday to investigate another person he says made false claims against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Grassley, in a letter to the Department of Justice and FBI, said a woman by the name of Judy Munro-Leighton took responsibility for authoring an anonymous letter that made allegations that Kavanaugh and a friend raped her. After she was tracked down and interviewed by Senate investigators, the woman recanted and said she was not, in fact. the author and had never met Kavanaugh.

Grassley claims the woman is a left-wing activist and told investigators it was “just a ploy,” he wrote in the letter.

Grassley asked for federal authorities to investigate her on allegations of making false statements and obstruction.

Yeah, people are probably going to do time over this.

Can’t blast the Grass.

You cannot just make up fake rape claims against a federal judge to try and stop him from being appointed to the Supreme Court. Of course, this bitch could have just stuck to her story and nothing would have happened because it cannot be disproved, but women are the ultimate retards so she just confessed.

The letter marks at least the fourth request Grassley has made of federal authorities to investigate those involved in the controversial Kavanaugh proceedings, which were extended due to a series of sexual assault allegations surfacing when Kavanaugh was in high school and college.

Grassley has thus far asked federal authorities to investigate: Julie Swetnick, who accused Kavanaugh of drunken behavior and sexual assault; Michael Avenatti, her lawyer who also represented porn star Stormy Daniels in a suit against President Donald Trump; and a man, who was never publicly identified but recanted an allegation he’d made against Kavanaugh.

Munro-Leighton was brought into the saga after a graphic and anonymous letter was sent to Sen. Kamala Harris in California. The letter included a story about Kavanaugh and another male groping, sexually assaulting and ultimately raping a woman in a vehicle after a party.

The letter was signed by a Jane Doe from Oceanside, Calif.

So this bitch was just a left-wing activist who thought she could write an anonymous letter accusing this guy of rape to stop his appointment to the court, and they tracked her down and now she’s probably going to jail.

lol.

This is clearly a major blow to the whole “rape hoax” strategy of the Democrat Party. It’s going to be very hard to get another one of these going after they’ve been caught just using completely fake nonsense from people who have never even met the accused.

Grassley says Munro-Leighton wrote an email that included her name. He said Senate investigators were able to track her down and found she lived in Kentucky, not California, and was a Democrat.

Investigators got in touch with her over the phone and Munro-Leighton admitted she wrote the email after seeing the “Jane Doe” letter in news reports. She said she claimed to be Jane Doe so the letter would gain attention, “I was angry and I sent it out,” the woman told investigators, according to Grassley’s letter, but in fact did not write it.

Grassley said the false allegation diverted resources on a time-sensitive matter. It’s unclear whether the true author was located or whether the inidivudal came forward.

“The Committee is grateful to citizens who come forward with relevant information in good faith, even if they are not one hundred percent sure about what they know,” he wrote in the letter to the FBI and DOJ. “But when individuals intentionally mislead the Committee, they divert Committee resources during time-sensitive investigations and materially impede our work. Such acts are not only unfair; they are potentially illegal.

Potentially?

This is obviously all kinds of illegal. It is an attempt to undermine the government, and so is actually sedition. It is also fraud, misleading federal investigators, conspiracy, etc. etc. etc.

But of course they will go easy on her because she’s a bitch. These filthy fucking whores demanded all the rights of men, and yet to this day, share virtually none of the responsibilities. They can commit all types of different crimes, and just not be punished for them because they have a front-hole.

But in this case, if there is pressure from the president and the Senate, she may at least have to face trial. I would say that is very important. Make an example of this bitch.

Avenatti is also under investigation, and he almost certainly was aware that his own rape-hoaxer was lying, though I’m not sure how that works as far as attorney-client privilege. I would love to see him get charged with something over this. But it’s probably unlikely. His Swetnick bitch, who by the way is Jewish, presumably can be charged. She is probably not dense enough to just admit it like this other bitch did, but an investigation could show that there was no way she could have ever met Kavanaugh.

Whatever the case, this looks very bad for Democrats and I imagine it hits them in their prized “suburban white woman” demographic. Women do not really sympathize with lying whores. In fact, women generally try to distance themselves from such women, because they do not want to be tainted by association.

Basically, the entire “blue wave” theory is based on the unsubstantiated claim that white women are fed-up with Trump and want to side with a bunch of niggers and lying sluts against him. I don’t think this is happening.

Join the discussion at TGKBBS