May 19, 2018
So wait, are we getting an actual policy that we voted for from Donald Trump?
Probably some court will just randomly be like “yeah no sorry white guy – not happening.”
The planned revival of a policy dating to Ronald Reagan’s presidency that was slightly retooled and quietly submitted for federal budget review Friday may finally present a way for President Trump to fulfill his campaign promise to “defund” Planned Parenthood.
Or at least to evict it from the federal family planning program, where it provides care to more than 40 percent of that program’s 4 million patients.
Congress last year failed to wipe out funding for Planned Parenthood, because the bill faced overwhelming Democratic objections and would not have received the 60 votes needed to pass in the Senate. But Trump’s move Friday could potentially accomplish what Congress could not.
According to administration officials, the proposed rules they have submitted to the Office of Management and Budget would require facilities receiving federal family planning funds to be physically separate from those that perform abortion; would eliminate the requirement that women with unintended pregnancies be counseled on their full range of reproductive options; and would ban abortion referrals.
All those changes would particularly affect Planned Parenthood.
Planned Parenthood, which provides a broad array of reproductive health services to women and men, also provides abortion services using nonfederal funds. Cutting off funding has been the top priority for anti-abortion-rights groups, which supported candidate Trump.
“A win like this would immediately disentangle taxpayers from the abortion business and energize the grassroots as we head into the critical midterm elections,” Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, a group that opposes abortion, said in a written statement.
In a conference call with reporters, Planned Parenthood officials said they would fight the new rules.
Regardless of the fact that even if this isn’t shut down by a judge, they could get Jew lawyers to say that a room across the hall is a “separate facility,” this is at least a shot across the bow at the abortion industry.
Which is a lot better than a shot across the bow at… Iran.
MANDATORY WHITE SUPREMACIST EXPLANATION OF DAILY STORMER’S ANTI-ABORTION POSITION
White supremacists, neo-Nazis, KKK members and other racists often come at me like “yo dude, abortion is good because more colored people have them than whites.”
To that I would answer: if you were in a room with a random white guy and two random black guys, and someone gave you a gun and was like “you can shoot all of these three people or none of them,” would you go ahead and kill the random white guy just so you could kill two random black guys?
Probably, you wouldn’t, even if you are a cold-blooded neo-Nazi Alt-Right KKK murder-master.
But the more important argument is a different argument.
The more important argument is that it is the empowerment of white women which has led to the multicultural situation. And we aren’t going to fix that situation without attacking the root cause, which is the liberation of women. The feminist revolution was the social revolution Jews did first, because they knew that it had to be done to get the rest of these revolutions through.
White women’s liberation is the cause of black liberation, it is the cause of mass immigration, it is the cause of faggotism and trannyism going mainstream. They are the ones supporting this, they are the primary footsoldiers of the Jew.
And it was the empowerment of women that ended up stripping white men of their masculinity.
Masculine white men never would have let any of this happen.
If we start forcing white women to have these babies they get pregnant with – which is also going to keep these stupid whores out of college – then all the sudden they’re not going to be so excited about flooding the country with brown people. That is a statistical fact.
So I am most concerned with disempowering women. It doesn’t really matter if there are an extra few million colored people in our country at this point.
There are already so many of these monkeys inside of our country, the process of removal is going to be the same either way.
So my primary concern is stripping women of their rights. And also obviously directly attacking Jews. The total numbers of coloreds are a priority, but they are a priority below those two priorities.
Oh and also, the third argument (which isn’t as important as the second): coloreds are a whole lot more likely to have illegal abortions. These Pajeet illegal clinics are being used now, simply because they are cheaper and easier than Planned Parenthood, in colored neighborhoods across America. And they will continue to exist. All kinds of illegal shit goes on in colored neighborhoods and the cops don’t even try to deal with it.
Every time I hear someone say “oh we have to keep abortion because racial abortion statistics” I am just like “smdh this person has not thought this through.”