July 13, 2019
Here’s the deal.
The entire “science” of “climatology” is a hoax. Point blank. It is a globalist plot to implement a world government. That might sound paranoid or absurd, but it is actually just a fact. These people use “computer models” to make predictions, and the predictions are almost without exception completely wrong, and when they are found to be wrong, they just release more computer models.
The entire thing is pathological, and the only reason anyone believes it is that it is repeated nonstop by academics and the media.
A new study conducted by a Finnish research team has found little evidence to support the idea of man-made climate change. The results of the study were soon corroborated by researchers in Japan.
In a paper published late last month, entitled ‘No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic climate change’, a team of scientists at Turku University in Finland determined that current climate models fail to take into account the effects of cloud coverage on global temperatures, causing them to overestimate the impact of human-generated greenhouse gasses.
They also fail to take into account the cycles of the intensity of the sun.
They fail to take into account anything, actually, and just ramble on nonsensically, presenting graphs that make hard predictions that are always wrong.
Fifteen years ago, Al Gore said we’d all be under water by now.
And he was basing that claim on IPCC data.
Models used by official bodies such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature,” the study said, adding that “a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing” in the models.
Adjusting for the cloud coverage factor and accounting for greenhouse gas emissions, the researchers found that mankind is simply not having much of an effect on the Earth’s temperature.
If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice.
The study’s authors make a hard distinction between the type of model favored by climate scientists at the IPCC and genuine evidence, stating “We do not consider computational results as experimental evidence,” noting that the models often yield contradictory conclusions.
Given the evidence presented in the study, the Finnish team rounded out the paper by concluding “we have practically no anthropogenic climate change,” adding that “the low clouds control mainly the global temperature.”
The results sharply cut against claims put forward by many environmentalists, including US lawmakers such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who argue not only that climate change is an immediate threat to the planet, but that it is largely a man-made phenomenon. Ocasio-Cortez, better known as ‘AOC’, has proposed a ‘Green New Deal’ to address the supposedly dire threat.
If you’re dazzled by their gibberish, all you have to do is look at what they are using this fake science for. It is always to push this world government agenda.
And they have no interest in solving any of the alleged problems they’re claiming exist. If they did, they would be arguing for nuclear power, which is safe and does not create CO2. Instead, the same people pushing the global warming hoax are also trying to shut down nuclear power.
This is all a gigantic scam, like something out of a children’s story.