French Government and Police Covered-Up Brutal Torture at Bataclan

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 17, 2016


With every other crazy thing which happened this week, I didn’t get a chance to report one of the craziest things.

The French government and police covered-up insane sexual torture which took place during the ISIS attack on the Bataclan Theatre during the ISIS attack in November of last year, which included, but was not limited to, cutting off men’s testicles and shoving them in their mouths.

Heat Street:

A French government committee has heard testimony, suppressed by the French government at the time and not published online until this week, that the killers in the Bataclan appear to have tortured their victims on the second floor of the club.

The chief police witness in Parliament testified that on the night of the attacks, an investigating officer, tears streaming down his face, rushed out of the Bataclan and vomited in front of him just after seeing the disfigured bodies.

The 14-hour testimony about the November attacks took place March 21st.

According to this testimony, Wahhabist killers reportedly gouged out eyes, castrated victims, and shoved their testicles in their mouths. They may also have disemboweled some poor souls. Women were reportedly stabbed in the genitals – and the torture was, victims told police, filmed for Daesh or Islamic State propaganda. For that reason, medics did not release the bodies of torture victims to the families, investigators said.

But prosecutors at the hearing claimed these reports of torture were “a rumor” on the grounds that sharp knives were not found at the scene. They also claimed that maybe shrapnel had caused the injuries.

Elsewhere, the investigator says, women were sexually tortured, stabbed in the genitals, and their eyes were plucked out. People were decapitated.

They would cover this up for the same reason they publicly announced during the Nice attack for people not to post pictures of the bodies on social media: because they want to protect the perpetrators, to make it appear as though their actions were not as severe as they actually were.

They also presumably don’t want people drawing comparisons with these same sorts of things having been committed by their people ancestors during previous eras.


Of course, the logic of the system is that the more people know about Islamic brutality, they less keen they will be on flooding their nations with Moslems. An analogy may be that if you were told that shooting yourself in the head doesn’t kill you, but instead gives you magical powers, you’d be a lot more likely to shoot yourself in the head.

Moslems are dangerous. We know they are dangerous. Beyond just the terrorism, you have the gang-rapes, such as those the German government attempted to cover-up at Cologne, the mass child sex trafficking, such as the cases that the British government spent decades covering-up, and the “normal” violent crime of murders, robberies, drug-dealing, etc.

If you do a cost-benefit analysis on mass Islamic immigration, you end up with a very severe disparity between the costs and the benefits, which is why government officials in Europe have literally come out advising against a cost-benefit analysis of mass Islamic immigration.

In fact, though we here at The Daily Stormer often joke that the only benefit is kebab, I’m aware of literally no other benefit at all. Of course, women like that they are able to expand their sexual options, but overall, it is clear that women dating and breeding with Moslems is not good for our society, and thus a net negative, regardless of how fun it is for the women involved.


Come to think of it, kebab itself isn’t particularly healthy, and so doesn’t really amount to a net-gain for our society either.

And here’s the question: who’s worse – the foreign soldier who cuts off your balls and shoved them in your mouth before gutting you, or the member of your own government who covers up the fact that this happened so as to make it more likely it will happen again?