Ghost of Hitler to Haunt Berlin on 70th Anniversary of His Death

Hamish Patton
Daily Stormer
April 29, 2015

As the 70^th anniversary of the death of Adolf Hitler approaches the douchebag liberal tissue of lies and propaganda The Guardian has posited the probing question about what impact The Fuhrer’s ghost will have on Berliners in 2015. Or rather it hasn’t, but it has, if you follow the logic of the ‘feature.’

Because it’s just an obvious given that Hitler’s spirit is going to dust off his grey jacket, pat Blondie on the head, and take a long walk through what has become of his onetime beatific vision that was to be Albert Speer’s Welthauptstadt Germania.

Following a historical rundown about the end of the war from the victorious liberal perspective, a footnote about Hitler’s demise, and a reminder of the evil legacy of the National Socialists, we come to the inevitable meditations on what this should mean for the people of Berlin who certainly won’t be marking the occasion of his death.

After mentioning Oliver Hirschbiegel’s film Downfall (2004) about Hitler’s “demented” last days in the bunker, the author pondered how fears arose that when Germany hosted the World Cup in 2006 Hitlerites would descend on the German capital hoping to visit the whereabouts of the bunker to pay homage.

This is where we are reminded of the architectural apocalypse that was constructed a few hundred yards from the former bunker as a memorial to the six brazillion innocent Jews that Hitler singled out for “industrial genocide”.

Even if there were but a half-a-percent of truth to the Holohoax myth then what supposedly happened to those Yids is nothing compared to what Eisenman should suffer for this crime against both truth and beauty. This epic monstrosity looks like a firm of drunken gypsy builders took a dumpster, filled it with cheap grey cement, and set out to construct the world’s most unplayable putt-putt course. No crime on earth, real or imagined, should warrant such an aesthetic atrocity being committed against one of the world’s greatest cities.  Wasn’t the bombing of Dresden bad enough?

We are then led to a brief paragraph introducing the discourse of how “Hitler and the Nazis” have come to occupy the extreme end of the moral spectrum, the immoral end.” Funnily enough, we might have thought progressive liberal literature did that by apologising for murderous Negroes, promoting the death of the family unit, and normalizing paedophilia, but on it goes:

“If you want to make a point about where racism, nationalism, militarism, flag-waving or almost any dubious behaviour might lead, you need only cite the Nazis. In fact there is a rule governing internet debate known as Godwin’s law that states ‘As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one’.”

Well, that last bit is annoyingly true enough.

Hereafter, the author mangles both word and idea to construe a logic sensible only to dickheads like his kind when he says, “…In many ways (it) has inhibited Berlin’s and Germany’s ability to take stock of the past.”

But once you wade through everything the author gabbles on with you come to the unassailable conclusion that he doesn’t actually HAVE anything specific to say and he just wanted to score a quid from writing something corresponding with the tragic loss of Adolf Hitler. Yes, Hitler’s gone, the Third Reich has passed, and Hitler’s ghost is off probably muttering derisive remarks about what poses as contemporary art in modern Berlin, as he does the rounds of the alleged galleries.

Meanwhile, our august writer scribbles about German historian Michael Stürmer who posed the vacillating contention that (in regards to the hoax) Germans either knew or didn’t know. He went on with an explanation of why Germans had valid reasons for supressing the (cough) “truth” about the Holohoax and it’s all perfectly reasonable.

Anthony Andrew, the author of this rambling budgie-cage liner of a featured article, then introduces Rabbi Daniel Alter who in “Berlin’s beautiful main synagogue” gets a lot of Germans dropping by to sheepishly protest, “I don’t want to do deal with that (the Holohoax) anymore. There is a widespread wish to avoid the topic unless you are an author who can make money out it.”

Obviously he was referring to his spiritual overlord Steven Spielberg and every other yarmulke-sporting bacon-hater who ever chased a shekel in the name of something so absurdly exaggerated as to make the real crime the myth itself.

However, we find that in this new liberalized and progressive Germany the Fuhrer’s ghost is nothing to fear. With the acceptance of mass immigration and constant shaming in bi-yearly Holocaust features churned out in both Hollywood and Europe, an amends has been made and as long as they always remember that they’re monsters, the German people are now A-OK. Up to a point.