December 9, 2015
The mighty Jew-beater Tyson Fury, fresh from having beaten the living hell out of the Jewish terrorist Wladimir Klitchko, is being investigated for having perhaps hurt the feelings of pedophiles and/or non-pedophile homosexualists.
In Brave New England, it is against the law to say words which could potentially hurt the feelings of deranged, pathological sexual perverts.
Police are investigating comments made by Tyson Fury in which he appeared to link homosexuals to paedophiles.
The world heavyweight boxing champion linked abortion and homosexuality with paedophilia, in an interview with the Mail on Sunday’s Chief Sports Writer Oliver Holt.
The interview took place before his big fight with Wladimir Klitschko in Dusseldorf, Germany, last week.
The self-proclaimed Gypsy King said: ‘There are only three things that need to be accomplished before the devil comes home.
‘One of them is homosexuality being legal in countries, one of them is abortion and the other is paedophilia. Who would have thought in the 50s and 60s that those first two would be legalised?
‘When I say paedophiles could be made legal, it sounds crazy. But if I had said to you about the first two being made legal in the 50s, I would have been looked upon as a crazy man.
‘If I would have told you 120 years ago that a 1,000-ton aeroplane is going to fly through the sky, a piece of steel, that would have been considered ludicrous.
‘People can say, ‘You are against abortions, you are against paedophilia, you are against homosexuality’, but my faith and my culture is based on the Bible.’
His comments sparked outrage and Greater Manchester Police has today confirmed they are investigating his comments after receiving a complaint, accusing Fury of a hate crime.
Officers will speak to Fury and take a statement from the boxing star as part of their inquiries.
Fury has also been accused of sexism, by saying fellow BBC Sports Personality of the Year nominee Jessica Ennis-Hill ‘looked good in a dress’ and for expressing a number of controversial views on women in sport.
However, police are only investigating his comments regarding homosexuality. And Fury has since defended his comments.
The devout Roman Catholic said: ‘Men don’t look good in dresses. Women do. And what? Why is that bad?
‘Why should it be for a sportswoman not to look nice in dresses? Are they not allowed to do that? Do they have to be treated like men all the time?’
‘I’m a little bit backward I didn’t really go to school so which part of ‘a woman looks good in a dress is sexist’? I stand up for my beliefs.
‘My wife’s job is cooking and cleaning and looking after these kids, that’s it. She does get to make some decisions – what she’s gonna cook me for tea when I get home.’
The problem here is that any masculine male is going to have these views, as such beliefs are determined by the same chemicals in your brain which determine aggression and physical strength.
As such, what they are actually saying when they say “you can’t hate faggots and think women should be cooking and having babies” is “you are not allowed to possess a masculine male identity.” This is part of the Jew-feminist war on men.
Correction: the Jew-feminist war on White men.
Note that no one goes around harassing Moslems about their views on women, which are much more aggressive than Fury’s views on women. Moslems actually make their women wear bags.
Of course, the line of reasoning is “these women like wearing bags.” And I don’t know, of course, but I would assume this is true. On the face of it, it appears to be true.
However, I am quite certain that Tyson Fury’s wife likes cooking for the World Heavyweight Champion as well.
So then, we have a blatant double-standard.
In other news, Fury yesterday had one of his titles stripped from him. It was due to a technicality, the IBF claims, however I’d imagine if you looked into if, you’d find a hooked nose.
Tyson Fury is now a genuine masculine role model for White boys. So they will do everything they can to attack him.
Yes, Homos Like Young Boys
Fury doesn’t appear to have been “equating” homosexuality with pedophilia, rather he lists them as two separate social problems, along with abortion.
However, it is worth noting here that while most homos are not baby-lovers (many are, but not most), the overwhelming majority of them do indeed like boys aged below the legal age of consent, which is how the British media has started defining “pedophilia.”
The ideal sex object of the average homosexual is a boy between the ages of 12 and 15. Traditionally, “pedophilia” has been defined as a special or exclusive attraction to prepubescent children, usually aged 11 and under, so they are not all, in scientific terms, actual pedophiles. However, they are obsessed with pubescent boys, and they seek them out when they are experiencing sexual confusion during this period of puberty, and exploit them.
This is a known fact. It was always known. Now, they have tried to separate this “pederasty” behavior from normal homosexualism for the reason of political liberation of homosexualists. It is a gigantic non-scientific scam designed to legitimize a group of dangerous perverts.