Jewish “Wax My Balls” Tranny Complains That Gynecologists Refused to See Him

Pomidor Quixote
Daily Stormer
December 4, 2019

Criminalizing and vilifying the act of refusing to go along with the delusions of men who say they are women and women who say they are men by using the actual pronouns that should be used to refer to them was the first step towards making it illegal to contradict transgenders in any way, shape, or form.

Eventually, it will be illegal to refuse to engage in sexual activities with them.

After all, if you are a heterosexual man, you should be attracted to ALL WOMEN without discriminating against them out of pure hatred for the authenticity of the genitals.

Daily Mail:

A Canadian transgender woman whose legal complaints against several beauticians who refused to wax her male genitalia were dismissed, has said now a gynecologist won’t see her.

Jessica Yaniv, 32, claimed numerous Vancouver estheticians discriminated against based on her ‘gender identity and gender expression’ when she requested a Brazilian bikini wax.

But last month a court found the claims were found to be ‘unjustified’ and ‘improperly motivated’ by financial gain.

On Monday, Yaniv said she was ‘shocked.. and confused… and hurt’ after a gynecologist office allegedly told her ‘we don’t serve transgender patients’.

‘Are they allowed to do that, legally? Isn’t that against the college practices,’ she tweeted at the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia.

This is truly shocking. Since when are people allowed to refuse to touch random genitals?

If your job revolves around touching genitals, you must never refuse to touch certain genitals.

Similar to how if you are heterosexual, you must never refuse to engage with trans women.

Discrimination is bad, okay?

The organization protects the public by establishing and enforcing high standards in the practice of medicine.

Yaniv’s Twitter profile describes her as an ‘LGBTQIA+ Advocate, Friend, Daughter & Tech Blogger. She/Her/Hers. Human rights advocate. Model. Global Internet Personality. Social Justice Warrior. Marketer’.

She added Tuesday that the CPSBC confirmed the refusal is discrimination under the BC Human Rights Code and against their code of Ethics.

Of course transgenders would involve Human Rights.

The article doesn’t mention the other obvious element of hate here: Yaniv is a Jew.

These gyno decisions are clearly also driven by virulent anti-Semitism, and we need to get the Canadian ADL involved ASAP.

Last month she sought justice after she said she was told by women at salons that they were unable to provide a service as they were not trained to wax male genitals – and could cause her serious injury.

Yaniv claimed they cited religious reasons and the fact they shouldn’t be forced to touch genitals they don’t want to.

She filed various complaints against estheticians in the Vancouver area, causing two to go out of business, and she was seeking as much as $15,000 in damages from each place.

However, the British Human Rights Tribunal dismissed her complaint, ruling that: ‘Human rights legislation does not require a service provider to wax a type of genitals they are not trained for and have not consented to wax.’

The Tribunal also found Yaniv to have ‘engaged in improper conduct’ including filing ‘complaints for improper purposes’, and called her testimony both ‘disingenuous’ and ‘self-serving’ along with ‘evasive and argumentative and contradictory’.

Her initial order for $500,000 in damages was also branded ‘divorced from reality and reason’.

All transgenders are divorced from reality and reason.

They are divorced from reality because they claim to be something that they’re evidently not, and they’re divorced from reason because they expect everyone to go along with it.

‘I find that Ms. Yaniv’s predominant motive in filing her waxing complaints is not to prevent or remedy alleged discrimination, but to target small businesses for personal financial gain,’ adjudicator Devin Cousineau determined.

Yaniv’s motives were therefore ruled not to be consistent with the B.C. Human Rights Code by Cousineau, and she was ordered to pay $6,000 for improper conduct.

Cousineau lowered the penalties against Yaniv after considering the ‘torrent of backlash and hatred’ against her online following the exposure of her claim last summer.

On Twitter, Yaniv appeared gracious in defeat, congratulating lawyer Tako Van Popta on his ‘win’ and added, ‘You and I will be meeting quite a bit over the next 4 years. We have a lot to work on to advance #LGBTQ equality. Let’s get started!!!’

If the faggot “adjudicator” lowered the penalties because Yaniv received an online “torrent of backlash and hatred,” what’s next?

Lowering all sentences because law-abiding citizens are mean to criminals?

Join the discussion at TGKBBS