November 4, 2017
Liberals abandon their core beliefs again?
Two male, liberal columnists this week launched personal attacks against White House press secretary Sarah Sanders.
Los Angeles Times columnist David Horsey mocked Sanders’ appearance, saying she “looks more like a slightly chunky soccer mom who organizes snacks for the kids’ games.”
“Rather than the fake eyelashes and formal dresses she puts on for news briefings, Sanders seems as if she’d be more comfortable in sweats and running shoes,” Horsey wrote on Wednesday. “Yet, even if Trump privately wishes he had a supermodel for a press secretary, he is lucky to have Sanders.”
Yes, that’s true.
And you should be allowed to say it.
But the same people who said it invented the idea that you shouldn’t be allowed to say it.
Another columnist, the New York Times’ Frank Bruni, similarly went out of his way on Friday to bash Sanders for her personal characteristics, in this case her way of speaking.
Bruni wrote that Sanders is “serving a function other than communication, which turns out not to be her forte.”
“To listen to her pronounce ‘priorities’ is akin to hearing the air seep out of a flat tire, and she leaves half of the consonants on the curb,” Bruni added parenthetically, mocking Sanders for her Southern accent.
Horsey apologized for his description of Sanders in an update to his column following this article’s publication.
Here’s that thing: the J-left does not actually “respect women.” They simply push an agenda.
Just like Harvey Weinstein is not a feminist, but the kind of guy who catches a woman in the hallway and forces her to watch him masturbate.
All of the social programs of the Jews are nothing more than a form of warfare against the goyim. They will switch them up at any time if it benefits them, and they are always on every side of every issue.
They even tried to make a Jew the head of the Neo-Nazi movement in the form of MILO.
That is why there is no arguing with these people.
None of what they say is in good faith. They don’t want to reach a logical conclusion as to what is best for society. They want to wreck society.