Metoo is Going Exactly According to Plan

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 4, 2018

Everything we’d hoped for when we began the Metooist journey is coming to fruition.

This is more than we ever could have hoped for.

There are two angles in this golden triangle:

  1. Jews are getting destroyed at a much higher rate than anyone else
  2. It is making feminism totally non-viable as a system, given that the implications of “any woman can say anything and be believed” means that no man is willing to be around women, and women are thus less desirable as employees or colleagues

This is liberal lupus: the body is attacking itself.

And the thing about this train is: it’s like an Amtrak – it has no brakes!

They can’t somehow walk this back or say that a time is coming when men won’t be mobbed and fired for touching a woman’s leg. They have committed themselves to giving women the right to destroy the life and career of any man they wish to target, and there is no path to take away that power within the liberal system. This is very similar to the way that when they triggered blacks and Antifa to attack Confederate heroes, there was no way to stop them from going after Thomas Jefferson and George Washington.

The liberal Jewish system can only go forward, never backward.

And how can sustained metoo possibly be compatible with the modern mutlti-sexual workplace?

Kyle Smith (of the National Review) writes for New York Post:

Consider what’s happening in the capital of Florida. Female staffers and lobbyists have found “many male legislators will no longer meet with them privately,” reported The Miami Herald. “I had a senator say, ‘I need my aide here in the room because I need a chaperone,’ ” lobbyist Jennifer Green told the paper. “I said, ‘Senator, why do you need a chaperone? . . . Do you feel uncomfortable around me?’ ‘Well,’ he said, ‘anyone can say anything with the door shut.’ ”

“I’m getting the feeling that we’re going back 20 years as female professionals,” said Green, who owns her company. “I fully anticipate I’m going to be competing with another firm that is currently owned by some male, and the deciding factor is going to be: ‘You don’t want to hire a female lobbying firm in this environment.’ ”

So this is now a thing that is going to become absolutely standard.

Women can then try and say it is sexist to not want to be alone in a room with a woman – but is that a viable claim, given that the man’s desire to not be in the room alone with them is so plain and plainly reasonable?

Probably not. But if the idea that it is abuse of women to not be alone with them takes hold, men will start quitting the jobs that require this and companies will begin putting protections in place that allow for men to avoid situations where they are alone with women.

This drastically downgrades women’s ability to perform a whole entire number of jobs, while also putting companies in an extremely uncomfortable – and expensive – position.

This kind of thinking is catching on in aggressively P.C. Silicon Valley, where men are taking to message boards like Reddit to express interest in sex segregation — sometimes labeled “Men Going Their Own Way,” or the “Man-o-Sphere.” How will that work out for women in the tech industry, where they already face substantial challenges?

Probably not very well.

Because this would mean that you would have to have tech teams that are entirely made-up of women. Women are incapable of doing tech, and are already simply leeching off the work of men on their teams. So Silicon Valley companies will be forced to subsidize entire female teams which fail to accomplish anything at all. There is also the issue that if a workplace is entirely made-up of women, all they do is gossip about one another and engage in little cat-fights.

It’s going to be expensive AND hilarious.

And again: how can men be denied this?

If the request is: “I don’t want to be around women because I’m afraid of being accused of sexual harassment,” how can the company deny them?

Across industries, “Several major companies have told us they are now limiting travel between the genders,” Johnny Taylor, president of the Society for Human Resource Management, told the Chicago Tribune, citing execs who tell men not to go on business trips or share rental cars with women co-workers. UCLA psychologist Kim Elsesser, the author of “Sex and the Office,” sees a nascent “sex partition.” If men start to back away from women, at least in professional settings, it’s difficult to see how that will aid the feminist cause.

It certainly would aid the feminist cause if the Jews were right about the nature of women. Just like a 100% black Detroit would aid the black cause if Jews were right about the nature of blacks.

However, the Jews have been lying about all of this. Women need the work of their male co-workers in order to succeed in the workplace, just like blacks need the work of whites to keep their living spaces from becoming shitholes.

We are finally introduced to a Jew woman who is arguing that women actually BENEFITED from a situation where men with power over them were sexually aggressive.

Writing in The American Interest, Claire Berlinski calls the #MeToo movement “a frenzied extrajudicial warlock hunt that does not pause to parse the difference between rape and stupidity” and “a classic moral panic, one that is ultimately as dangerous to women as to men.” She tells a story about how she just discovered she has a new power: the power to ruin the career of a professor she knew at Oxford who grabbed her butt 20 years ago while drunk at a party. “I was amused and flattered,” she writes, saying, “I knew full well he’d been dying to do that. Our tutorials — which took place one-on-one with no chaperones — were livelier intellectually for that sublimated undercurrent. He was an Oxford don and so had power over me . . . But I also had power over him — power sufficient to cause a venerable don to make a perfect fool of himself at a Christmas party. Unsurprisingly, I loved having that power.”

This is of course all true – women obviously enjoy sexual attention from powerful men. But while obviously true, it is also the opposite of what Jews have been telling all of us for the last I don’t know how many decades.

The Jew feminist Berlinski has the motivation to stop metooism because it is targeting Jews so disproportionately, but she also presumably just understands that this is all going nowhere good. What we are going to see – what we are already seeing – is a massive backlash against feminism itself, first from men and then also from women.

The feminist idea was forced on society by Jews. It is unnatural. And its ultimate end is obviously sex segregation, which is the thing that it was initially designed to oppose.

Again, this is similar to the way blacks are now demanding racial segregation at universities and elsewhere.

The natural order will always assert itself. Everything works toward that end. The only way to keep the natural order at bay is to constantly be applying force against it, as the Jews have done. But the longer you do that, the more force is necessary as the pressure builds.

This is why this super-authoritarianism has emerged from the J-left, where everything is about shutting down speech and punishing people for any small disagreement with the system while also attempting to bury white people under a mountain of brown third world sludge. But that mindset is what created Donald Trump. And the pressure that is being applied to Donald Trump will ultimately create an even more aggressive right-wing force.

The tides of the universe itself are now turning in our favor, friends. All we need to do is continue the sabotage of the social order.

Join the discussion at TGKBBS