National Geographic’s Jewish Editor-in-Chief Cries About the Magazine’s “Racist” Past

Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
March 13, 2018

Meet Susan Goldberg the strong and empowered Jewish woman who is currently in the process of destroying National Geographic with all types of kikery.

National Geographic is one of the most beloved publications in modern history. It rose to cultural prominence in the 20th century providing readers with all sorts of stories and pictures from far away places. My late grandmother used to have huge stacks of these magazines in her house.

As culturally significant as this publication has been, the current Jewish Editor-in-Chief Susan Goldberg has made numerous criticisms about the magazine’s so-called “racist” past.


National Geographic acknowledged on Monday that it covered the world through a racist lens for generations, with its magazine portrayals of bare-breasted women and naive brown-skinned tribesmen as savage, unsophisticated and unintelligent.

“We had to own our story to move beyond it,” editor-in-chief Susan Goldberg told The Associated Press in an interview about the yellow-bordered magazine’s April issue, which is devoted to race.

National Geographic first published its magazine in 1888. An investigation conducted last fall by University of Virginia photography historian John Edwin Mason showed that until the 1970s, it virtually ignored people of color in the United States who were not domestics or laborers, and it reinforced repeatedly the idea that people of color from foreign lands were “exotics, famously and frequently unclothed, happy hunters, noble savages_every type of cliché.”

For example, in a 1916 article about Australia, the caption on a photo of two Aboriginal people read: “South Australian Blackfellows: These savages rank lowest in intelligence of all human beings.”

You can call that statement about aboriginals all sorts of things, but you can’t say that it is wrong. Aboriginals on average have some of the lowest IQs on the planet. Before all of journalism was kiked, publications like National Geographic actually took pride in reporting factual information.

National Geographic’s reporting on the intelligence of Aboriginals in 1916 is as accurate then as it is today. Just look at these savage creatures and try to find fault with their logic.

Goldberg goes on to talk about how the magazine promoted racist stereotypes of Pacific island women while bashing colonialism as a very bad thing.

In addition, National Geographic perpetuated the cliche of native people fascinated by technology and overloaded the magazine with pictures of beautiful Pacific island women.

“I think National Geographic was a product of its time,” Goldberg said. “It started at the height of colonialism and that is the lens through which it covered the world.”

Obviously the insinuation she is making is that colonialism was the most evil thing to ever happen and the product of White racists. But if colonialism as a concept was so bad, perhaps she’d like to lecture her fellow Jews about the Jewish colony of Israel in Palestine. She does not do this because criticism of colonialism is only meant to bash White people.

This examination comes as other media organizations are also casting a critical eye on their past. The New York Times recently admitted that most of its obituaries chronicled the lives of white men, and began publishing obituaries of famous women in its “Overlooked” section.

In National Geographic’s April issue, Goldberg, who identified herself as National Geographic’s first woman and first Jewish editor, wrote a letter titled “For Decades, Our Coverage Was Racist. To Rise Above Our Past, We Must Acknowledge It.”

“I knew when we looked back there would be some storytelling that we obviously would never do today, that we don’t do and we’re not proud of,” she told AP. “But it seemed to me if we want to credibly talk about race, we better look and see how we talked about race.”

The fact that you have a Jewish woman in charge of this magazine means that the publication will never talk honestly about race in any capacity. The magazine has lost all credibility with this awful Jew in charge of it. It’s laughable for her to say otherwise and claim that bashing the magazine’s entire history as a racist mistake is somehow elevating their credibility on the subject.

But hell, with this kike running things, National Geographic has abandoned its original purpose and is even going so far as to push tranny propaganda. Just look at these recent magazine covers.

Jews have destroyed pretty much everything so it is not a surprise to see a Jew destroying one of the most iconic magazines of all time. The only solution to this problem is to ban Jews from our societies entirely.