Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Daily Stormer
August 23, 2015
The southern European nations are far from being a homogenous lot, despite all being originally of Mediterranean stock.
Each people is separate and distinct and their national characters and history have been defined by the racial types making up those countries.
Portugal once had a huge empire, but by stretching itself too far, the original stock became impoverished, as the best of it left for foreign lands.
Italy once contained Rome, but Rome lost its racial purity when it made citizens of all races, only later to be rescued by the invasion of new and vigorous barbarian stocks.
Spain lost many of her best stocks through the celibate monastic system, on top of being under Moslem occupation for centuries.
T Lothrop Stoddard shows how we can see the racial traits of these three nations by looking back at their history.
He also points out the evidence for it in the rise of fascism in Italy and in Spain, at the time of his writing.
Narrated by Sven Longshanks and taken from Racial Realities in Europe, by T Lothrop Stoddard.
Part 1 – Italy
Part 2 – Spain and Portugal
We play a 6 hour loop of the best pro-White audio from around the internet each day on the Radio Stormer Livestream, starting with a new Radio Stormer Narration at 12pm Eastern/5pm British time.
The radio schedule is in the chat room.
Join the chat room, Subscribe through iTunes, listen live or follow the feed.
This is clearly the Anglo-Saxon version of history, the fall of the Spanish Empire was not due to racial motives but due to the constant attacks of the Brits and their allies. The Brits tried to steal Spanish land in South America countless times, then they realized that the best way to destroy your enemy is by infiltrating it, they outlined some of these plans in the book “A proposal to humble Spain”, Spain had the most powerful currency in the world, the Spanish dollar and people like the Prussian geographer Alexander von Humboldt have written extensively about how the territories owned by Spain were the most prosperous in the planet. At the height of the Spanish Empire (17th Century), the Spanish Empire was the largest empire in the world and included the following modern countries and territories: Bahamas, Belize, Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan), Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States (California, Oregon, Washington, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Arizona, Missouri, Iowa, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Nebraska, Alaska). The Brits turned the biggest Empire on earth into little Republics with unpayable external debts. After that, the heir of the Spanish Empire, the Mexican Empire which remained loyal to Spain was destroyed by the same conspirators in conjunction with American Masons like Joel Roberts Poinsett who had Maximilian I of Mexico (A red-headed European man) killed to put their masonic puppets in power. So people wondering why Mexico sucks today, just remember that the Mexican Empire with Maximilian I of Mexico as the head of the Empire was destroyed by British/American/Masonic conspirators. I wish the DS would write an article about uncomfortable things like this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQSHgzbk43U
The British Elite has never had the interest of the British people in mind, after destroying the Spanish Empire, the Third Reich, etc. they didn’t hesitate to do the same to their own people.
New meme:
This is clearly the Anglo-Saxon version of history, the fall of the Spanish Empire was not due to racial motives but due to the constant attacks of the Brits and their allies. The Brits tried to steal Spanish land in South America countless times, then they realized that the best way to destroy your enemy is by infiltrating it, they outlined some of these plans in the book “A proposal to humble Spain”, Spain had the most powerful currency in the world, the Spanish dollar and people like the Prussian geographer Alexander von Humboldt have written extensively about how the territories owned by Spain were the most prosperous in the planet. At the height of the Spanish Empire (17th Century), the Spanish Empire was the largest empire in the world and included the following modern countries and territories: Bahamas, Belize, Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan), Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States (California, Oregon, Washington, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Arizona, Missouri, Iowa, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Nebraska, Alaska). The Brits turned the biggest Empire on earth into little Republics with unpayable external debts. After that, the heir of the Spanish Empire, the Mexican Empire which remained loyal to Spain was destroyed by the same conspirators in conjunction with American Masons like Joel Roberts Poinsett who had Maximilian I of Mexico (A red-headed European man) killed to put their masonic puppets in power. So people wondering why Mexico sucks today, just remember that the Mexican Empire with Maximilian I of Mexico as the head of the Empire was destroyed by British/American/Masonic conspirators. I wish the DS would write an article about uncomfortable things like this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQSHgzbk43U
The British Elite has never had the interest of the British people in mind, after destroying the Spanish Empire, the Third Reich, etc. they didn’t hesitate to do the same to their own people.
You know, Spain and Italy are somewhat big countries and they both have differences between north and south but I’m sure you know that, Sven. I’ve seen dna results from a Northern Italian friend and he’s 100% european, kelto-nordid type, which is not that common around the area but yes, they exist.
@30:20 “Fascism is a vivid outpouring of the Italian spirit.” Exactly.
An interesting listen, but I still don’t buy into any of the “Portuguese and Spaniards have a high percentage of Negroid/Arabic DNA.
Taking a genealogy DNA test could answer some questions as to ones origins, but one must be prepared for some possible unfavorable findings.
http://dna.ancestry.com/
I don’t think that Ancient Rome was completely blonde. In fact, many of the women would dye their hair or wear wigs because a lot of the Roman men were atteacted to the blonde Northern women. There has also been painted statues in Rome. The paint has worn off but specks of paint are still there and many of the statues had darkish brown hair.
I’ve only listened to the Italian section but it was interesting. If you look at the skull shape of many Italians it is very similar to Germanic people’s. I’d also like to point out that the Italians have the same average iq as Germany and the Netherlands. It seems to me that the countries with the lowest iqs in europe would be the South Slavs.
Hi Sven. It’s kinda disappointing to read you calling the portuguese and spaniards blacks, principally because I have respect for you. But “the feels” aside, I would like to point out that I read all the called nordicist material and it uses weak arguments, here is an example of a simple debunking of the Nordic Hellas theory:
http://dienekes.awardspace.com/articles/hellenes/
I also would like to add that this kind of attitude is typically anglo-saxon, which come as no surprise why you are the most despised of all europeans and conversely the most beloved by “trendy” people worldwide (no offense, just an observation).
I´ve visited spain this summer and some spaniards even had blue eyes. to me there is no question wether spanish people are white people or not.
Sven Levantine thinks he is a Jew from the Bible. Can you imagine a man like Hitler encountering a person that believes in that? Positive Christianity in the Third Reich specifically sought to surgically remove the Old Testament, as they felt it was a Judaizing force. They were obviously right, Sven himself acts like a vicious dishonest little kike.
A lot of Anglo-Saxons behave like Aryan-Jews, which is probably why that laughable British Israelist philo-Semitism resonates with Sven and a couple others in that cult posting here. These people have been the hands that murdered 10’s of millions of whites in the 19th and 20th century for their Jewish masters, it’s natural for them to go a step further and identify themselves as the historic kike plague.
Materialism, hubris, infantilism, and inflammatory hypocrisy that really only comes second to the kikes themselves are known cultural traits of the British Isles and its colonies. As a historic entity, they had no qualms starting calumnies about people they saw as competitors, whether they are the unusually evil mulatto Spaniards it is ok to practice piracy against or baby-bayoneting Germans whose women and children are fair game in Dresden and Munich. That’s how the Black Legend got started, and why after Jews invented the Holohoax it got legs.
You guys talking in circles about Spain this and Italy that and Golden Dawn, are all tip toeing around the elephant in the room, that Spain, and Italia, and Greece, have been invaded raped mongrelized and permanently polluted to more than a small degree.
Iberians were blond. Fact.
Founding Romans were blond. Fact.
Spartans and Macedonians were blond. Fact.
Hellas means literally “White” “pure shining white light”.
Jesus Christ, blond hair, fact.
Achilles, blond hair with a tinge of red, fact.
Hellen, Agamemnon, blond, fact.
All 37 founding families of Rome were blond until they race mixed and fratricided themselves into extinction.
And the Portuguese, yeah they sailed the globe, sent out single white men their best and brightest, with functioning dicks who all became race mixers and ancestor slayers, and then, brought their savages and abominations home. And where is Portugal today? Not worth visiting.
And I’m not going to debate this. I’ve read meticulous translations of Homer, and Arthur Kemp, and the viking invasion of Greece after the volcanic eruption.
You say there is a reason ‘we’ make fun of blondes?
No. We don’t. Jews do that.
“Arab” is from Aramaic and is a verb that means “to grow dark”, and yes, Italy, Portugal, Spain, are more than a little “dark” now.
“German” is a word the Romans used that means “genuine” to describe the blond haired, and comes from their practice of buying and wearing blond haired wigs from the slaves they captured, at the final stages of the empire as all the pure bloods had already been either murdered in fratricide or miscegenated.
Trying to speak of, Italian valor, must be a joke. Hitler wrote “wherever you find victory there you will find Italy” referring to their habit of switching sides in the middle of a war, something they did twice in a single war as David Irving points out. Hitler also wrote that if not for Mussolini, he might have won.
It is a funny thing, those who look down and snicker at what’s below, froth when they look up and envy, doing exactly what the niggers do.
So, you want to be superior to the niggers and the mestizzos and the chinamen but then you don’t want to be inferior to anything above you, thus acknowledging superior and inferior exist on the one hand when it suits you conveniently and then arguing against it when it does not. Now which is it?
Our Spartan ancestors were not like this. When they were informed that they were not selected for the king’s royal guard or some other post of honor, they would reply “I am happy that a better man has taken my place.”
Each should strive to improve himself by selecting noble thoughts which germinate into noble words and deeds, and rise above the limitations of genetic hardware, which are but temporary.
Portugal possessed a magnificent colonial and trading empire across several continents. It was a wonderful achievement of the Portuguese people. Such a small country as Portugal was able to rule lands so vast and so distant and so huge. Portuguese people spread their faith, their language and their culture across the continents. That was one of the ideas behind colonialism. White Europeans wanted to “civilize the savages” and “brings light of civilization onto them”. This was a popular attitude and idea from the 19th century. Probably was before. Portuguese people conquered 1) Brazil 2) Azores 3) Madeira 4) Sao Tome and Principe 5) Cape Verde Islands 6) Guinea-Bissau 7) Angola 8) Mozambique 9) Goa Province in India 10) East Timor 11) Macau. These are vast territories spread out across several continents and everywhere Portuguese left their mark. Portuguese voice in the world sounded the most strongly under the banner of their mighty colonial empire. They were stronger than ever due to it.
You stink, no, reek, of an agent provocateur. Fact.
Someone like you doesn’t even deserve to be addressed, you’re here to tell inflammatory lies and drag people into fruitless, mindless debates that go on forever. If you’re some Klansman living next to a meth cook house in Arkansas, the Spartans aren’t your ancestors. If you’re a little Jew at the ADL offices, well played sir.
You provide no links to any scientific studies or anthropological data showing Jesus, the Spartans, or Iberians were ever Nordic. You just make up some fairy tales and abuse etymology like how the Nation of Islam “proves” everything ever made was black. That your expectation and standard for evidence is so similar says a lot about you.
There is abundant proof for what he says, just in the Bible and in the books of Flavius Josephus alone. Let alone the Greek and Roman classics.
Agent provocateur? For pointing out facts well known to the majority of White Nationalists?
You are the one who is coming across as someone promoting a false narrative, you have even resorted to name calling and mocking the physical features of authors in your desperation to convince people we are all mongrels.
Now why might that be?
Flavius Josephus was a fucking dirty Jew first of all (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus). Second of all, the Bible says nothing about Nordic Spartans, Nordic Iberians, or Nordic Jesus. Take your medicine, Sven Levantine.
I’m obviously dealing with a fucking kook. If that picture in your avatar is you, then surely an olive skinned dark haired heavily autistic little man like you ought to know better.
How is he wrong? If I saw most Italians, Greeks or spainards I would not recognize them as white…
That’s fine. But that doesn’t make them mulattoes or Arabs, nor does it mean Germanic or Celtic people who always existed as subordinates of Rome (at best) created classical civilization.
If you think the Nordic race in its current form originates from North Africa and the Levantine like Sven Levantine thinks, then say so so I can write you off as a retard as well.
No, I believe Aryan originated in central asia, and migrated to Europe. I also think that many southern Europeans are not fully european. some are, some are not. But in ancient days, the way Greeks and Romans were described you would think they were scandinavian. I’m not an expert on this, nor do I pretend to be. Just saying what I think.
Where were they described as being like Scandinavians? There were blonde Greeks and blonde Romans as there are today (in fact, the one thing that is true is that Macedonians were blonde in ancient times, blonder than the other Greek tribes, and still are today). But that does not mean they are the same as Northern Europeans who never built a culture like Rome until a thousand years later.
Achilles was described as blonde (what I assume is an example of what you’re referring to) as were a few other Gods and Mythological heroes, but then again, in the Sagas Odin is described as having dark features with curly hair. Does that mean the Vikings were Mediterranean, or their aristocracy was Mediterranean, or that the founding stock was Med?
You want it to be true, but that doesn’t make it true. The only people who actually believe the Greeks and Romans were majority blonde are people in the Anglo-Saxon world whose main understanding of history comes from Hollywood movies.
If anything, Italians got blonder after the collapse of Rome, as they assimilated were largely Germanic and Celtic slaves while the barbarian tribes they descended from broke Rome up into little principalities.
Fuck off nigger lover mongrel BASTARD.
It is best to analyze the “Races of Europe” with a haplogroup map that is up to date with large sample sizes. A good map overrules Stoddard in some cases. This also can be a tool to bring Whites together and to bring people over to our side.
Clearly, R1a (East) -R1b (West) is the common “European” mainland person. Nordic I1 (North) is infused throughout Europeans as well in varying amounts. These four racial groups primarily built our modern “Civilization” (I1,I2,R1a,R1b) and all of them have “Blondes”.
Note that Spain/S.Italy/Portugal all have areas with a fair amount of “Albanian/Greek/Berber” Mediterranean E1b1b. Supposedly Adolf Hitler had this genetic subclade according to a few studies on his relatives. As we all know, in the Balkans there can be found genetic “surprises” now and then.
I would caution approaching STEM type people with “Stoddard’s” views… approach them with this map – it gives a better and more comprehensive picture:
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtml
It is best to analyze the “Races of Europe” with a haplogroup map that is up to date with large sample sizes. A good map overrules Stoddard in some cases. This also can be a tool to bring Whites together and to bring people over to our side.
Clearly, R1a (East) -R1b (West) is the common “European” mainland person. Nordic I1 (North) is infused throughout Europeans as well in varying amounts. These four racial groups primarily built our modern “Civilization” (I1,I2,R1a,R1b) and all of them have “Blondes”.
Note that Spain/S.Italy/Portugal all have areas with a fair amount of “Albanian/Greek/Berber” Mediterranean E1b1b. Supposedly Adolf Hitler had this genetic subclade according to a few studies on his relatives. As we all know, in the Balkans there can be found genetic “surprises” now and then.
I would caution approaching STEM type people with “Stoddard’s” views… approach them with this map – it gives a better and more comprehensive picture:
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtml
Some truths, some bs. The problem is that none of these places were really “homogeneous” at the time of their greatness anyway. The Spaniards that conquered from 1500-1800 were a mix of everything, same with the Portuguese. The Romans were a mix of Gauls, Greeks, Latins, Etruscans and the later Renaissance period was even more of a crazy “mongrelization”.
Historically, a small amount of diversity and friction is always good for success… but if you go to far out from Europe, then you run into problems.
Also, all empires/civilizations have their cycles where they expand, peak, then regress. At one stage, Britannia ruled the seas and now it’s a land of cucks not allowed to carry guns with Pakis raping their women en mass… and yet, racially they are the exact same people that ruled the world. How can you explain that?
Yes, that is mainly what Stoddard was writing about Tiberius, the differing amounts of Nordic and Alpine blood that has mixed with those Mediterraneans and at what points in history.
He wasn’t interested in the mulattoes among those nations that had Negro, Arab and Jew blood, although today that is by far the most important issue.
Difference =
Um this is Machiavelli. Why are you talking about Moses? You’re evidence is deranged.
http://a5.files.biography.com/image/upload/c_fill,cs_srgb,dpr_1.0,g_face,h_300,q_80,w_300/MTE5NDg0MDU1MDQ5MzA3NjYz.jpg
And here’s my brilliant counter-example lol.
Italic
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/2414556/thumbs/o-JOE-FLACCO-570.jpg?1
Germanic
http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130612042527/looneytunes/images/5/58/20060718_napoleon_dynamite_2.jpg
Eh this seems more like the usual pan-Nordic ideology that all Europeans are blacks except for them.
“eh this seems like more of the usual genetic science which proves that Italians aren’t Caucasian”
Science proves Mediterranean people are exposed to sun radiation more often, and that’s it. Scandinavian people get their pale features from being exposed to colder climates more often. Any pan-Nordic theory that all other Europeans are icky tainted negroes has long been debunked.
Did this fellow, Stoddard, even know about the Celtic migrations that took people to Spain and from there to the UK?, to Ireland and from Ireland to Scotland (the Scots were an Irish tribe)?, or did he conveniently forget about this fact and only focus on later arrivals; the Angles and the Saxons? Let’s also not forget that the ‘New World’ was opened up to all other Europeans by Spaniards and that Australia had been discovered by the Portuguese well before the English arrived. This is nothing short of divisive and plays right into the hands of jewish agitators.
Right at the beginning of the chapter he explains that the only true Mediterraneans left are the Welsh and the Irish.
The rest all have racial admixture, which was later proved through DNA research, the results of which have been added to the end of the book, to prove just how accurate his research was.
Don’t know about the Welsh, but the Irish are of predominantly Celtic stock. Celts are considered a different group to the Mediterranean group (the original ‘Old Europeans’ whereas Celts are Indo-Europeans). Some remnants of the Mediterranean people can be found in the Basque territory of Spain as well. I am, of course, using Arthur Kemp’s March of the Titans as a reference.
Celtic is a linguistic term, rather than a racial one.
Personally the only difference I see between Nordic and pure-bred Mediterraneans is superficial, such as eye colour and hair colour.
Nordics are taller and have a higher proportion of lighter colours, but that is about it.
Rome was founded by the same people who founded Troy, Athens and colonised Britain. According to the earliest descriptions of them, they had a wide variety of hair and eye colour, were well proportioned and tall.
Later on, when the Anglo-Saxons invaded Britain the Celts intermarried with them, but by that time, they were refusing to intermarry with anyone from the South of Europe.
It is all in the Chronicles of England.
And it is those superficial differences which divide White people, unfortunately. In the eyes of many today, a Joseph Goebbels type wouldn’t be allowed in the door, based purely on looks.
I think it comes mainly from countries that have had non-White populations living among them for more than a few generations.
Understandably they are wary of people with darker hair and eyes. In a country that no race-mixing was possible in until a few decades back, you are not going to get it, because they can be certain that their countrymen are still White and darker hair colour is just the natural diversity that you find among White nations.
Nobody in Europe ever considered Joseph Goebbels (!) non-white outside of British/American/Jewish propaganda that tried to work that angle against him and Hitler during WW2. It was standard for them to try and claim Hitler’s nose was “mongoloid” and Goebbels was “swarthy”, it has to do with their utter infantilism and the fact that they had no moral or rational case against the Germans. The Black Legend against Iberians came from a similar background, it was used to justify gypsy like behavior by British pirates against them.
You see the agenda clearly when Kelly Jones who looks like the archetypical Iberian is unquestionably a “pure Mediterranean” according to crackpots because he was born on the British Isles, but his many lookalikes further South are mixed Arabs and mulattoes. Arthur Kemp’s “Mediterranean” from Britain looks like any WOP from Southern Italy, but they’re totally different. Because they say so.
If some WN’s in English-speaking countries are stupid enough to pass up the next genius Joseph Goebbels because of his eye or hair color, then they deserve their situation.
Yes, this division exists and it’s detrimental. Showing photographs of a few people with the intention of classifying every person from that country in accordance with the images is ludicrous and false, hence every uninformed individual believes that Italians and Spaniards are all tainted with non-White blood, while this is true with regards to a fair percentage of the population in those countries, it by no means encompasses their entire population, nor even the majority. I get your point, a Scotsman with brown eyes must be a Mediterranean, while a Southern European with brown eyes must surely be mixed with black or arab background. No way Europe will ever be united with this type of mentality prevailing, it just helps the jews maintain their divide and conquer agenda. It goes the other way too; anyone telling blonde jokes should be put in their place and made to feel ashamed of such idiotic behaviour.
Great show!
Thanks, I am glad you took the time to listen to it Stimpy.
Another weird thing is that Stoddard himself looks almost textbook Mediterranean. Not that it would undermine his thesis if it had merit to it, but still interesting. I’ve been to both Southern and Northern Europe, and can tell you from personal experience that Stoddard leans far more towards alleged mulatto southern Portugal than he does the genuinely very Nordic Netherlands.
Stoddard does not look like a mulatto at all and he certainly doesnt have a round skull.
What he looks like bears no relevance to his work at all.
I see you are now reduced to ad hominem equivalent in your quest to discredit his work.
We dont all seek to bend the truth to try and make it suit ourselves.
I never said he did. I said he looked Portuguese, which he does, and if he thinks the Portuguese are mulatto then what does that say of him?
Obviously Sven, you are a person with a very low IQ, so I think continuing to debate your Biblically Nordic Spartans is a waste of time. Good luck in your self-esteem rehabilitation and guidance from vile trecherous little Jew rats like Josephus, Sven Jones. I can’t get angry at you, you’re too stupid to hate.
You talk of things you obviously know nothing whatsoever about.
Josephus drew a clear distinction between himself and the mongrelised bastards calling themselves Jews. There is a whole chapter in the books of Maccabees about the Spartans being descended from Judah as well as in Josephus’ histories, which you have clearly not read.
Just like a Jew you try to smear White racial researchers like Stoddard and claim Josephus as one of yours.
What a pathetic attempt at trolling.
Lothrop Stoddard was a great journalist, but his anthropological work is sullied by his personal ideology (Anglo-Saxonism, you even see sneak peaks of this when he wrote his mostly accurate but sometimes condescending account of life in the Third Reich). Why didn’t Nordics build Rome in pre-historic Germania, where they were far larger in number and less allegedly diluted/weighed down by Alpines and Mediterraneans? Can Stoddard name any major Spanish or Portuguese figure during the age of exploration on par with Magellan and Cortez that was actually Nordic?
There is also a huge, I mean massive and glaring error in the one about Spain and Portugal at 13:13. Stoddard confuses General Francisco Franco (who indeed was a dolt) for the brilliant Falangist Jose Antonio Prime de Rivera that was executed by communists during the civil war. I can’t even comprehend how this got past the editors. This is one shitty book.
Anyway, just to understand how this goes both ways, Italian anthropologist Giuseppe Sergi was like a mirror image of this. He instead staked the claim that British civilization was the product of a Mediterranean aristocracy and uses similar conflation and out of context examples to make his case.
Stoddard’s especially vicious with the Portuguese, by claiming that the
country is mulatto. But these views are mostly Victorian era propaganda/urban legends. According to actual records researched by Jonathan Gill, 16th and 17th century Portugal was no more than 1% negro in total, almost entirely concentrated in Lisbon, and interracial mingling was so taboo in mainland Portugal that most of these slaves were castrated. From the 16th century to the 19th century Great Britain was actually the capital of the global slave trade, Queen Elizabeth even complained about how large their numbers were getting in the late 16th century (“blackamoors”). Historians like Paul Lovejoy speculate that millions of negroes between the 18th and 19th century were settled in Liverpool, London, and Bristol, both as slaves and free men.
I say both the Medicists and Nordicists are motivated more by what they want to be true, rather than what is true. It is true that around 2% of the average Iberians DNA is associated with sub-saharan Africans, but similar numbers have appeared in Finnish (2%) and Norwegian (1%) y-dna . Scientists believe this has much less to do with Moors or contemporary miscegenation as Stoddard imagines than it does prehistoric neolithic migration, here’s an interesting read on the topic: http://www.jogg.info/51/files/Lancaster.pdf
Nordics were not in pre-historic Germania in large numbers when Rome was being built, they were mainly in the Levant, North Africa and southern Europe.
They migrated into northern Europe later, as Scythians.
Nordics don’t come from the Levant or North Africa, lol. The only thing close to what you’re saying are the Vandals, who came to North Africa for the first time in the 6th century AD. Who were the German speaking people living in Germania that the Romans conquered, and why were they so far behind the Romans if technically, they were even more Nordic than the Romans themselves?
With all due respect, you sound like the Alex Jones of race. It’s kind of embarrassing for the Stormer.
Maybe you should try responding to what I actually wrote Eric instead of pretending I said something different.
‘Nordics were not in pre-historic Germania IN LARGE NUMBERS when Rome was being built.’
I guess you must think Nordics were sitting in the ice, freezing their asses off doing nothing and leaving no trace until they suddenly discovered civilisation in Europe in the first millennium.
Try looking at what the classic historians had to say about it.
If the supposed Nordics in Rome were limited to the aristocracy, obviously they were small in numbers there too. Were the only people in Europe in ancient times concentrated in Southern Europe? Of course not. There were people living in upper central and northern Europe, they were Celts and Germanic, and they never built anything even close to Rome, they were the slaves and mercenaries of it. The Greeks and Romans not only considered them a completely distinct people, but called them barbarians.
You’re obviously a mentally ill freak.
More ad hominems and comments that do not refute anything that I have written.
I will repeat my comment for the third time since you have been too up your own arse so far, to realise what it actually says:
‘Nordics were not in pre-historic Germania IN LARGE NUMBERS when Rome was being built, they were mainly in the Levant, North Africa and SOUTHERN EUROPE.’.
They migrated into northern Europe later, as Scythians.’
http://www.dailystormer.com/radio-stormer-narrations-hero-king-brutus-and-his-britons/
http://www.dailystormer.com/radio-stormer-narrations-the-hidden-history-of-britain-part-1/
http://www.dailystormer.com/radio-stormer-narrations-the-hidden-history-of-britain-part-2/
http://www.dailystormer.com/radio-stormer-narrations-the-hidden-history-of-britain-part-3/
How were Nordics in Northern Africa pre Visigoth migration?
Carthage, Libya, Ethiopea, Egypt.
Copts and Berbers were Nordic?
Sven smokes crack.
Correction, my uneducated friend, Nordics DID build Rome. They also built the pyramids, or didn’t you know, didn’t you see the blond hair mummies?
Why don’t you go read March of the Titans and learn about it?
Oh that’s right, the book costs money, and is longer than 250 words.
I’ve read March of the Titans. It is tripe that uses its basis for making claims like Portugal is negro based on a pamphlet written by a black (Ray Smith was a janitor, if I remember correctly, lol) called “Black Man’s Gift to Portugal”. Someone who does that isn’t an honest truth-seeker, they’re pushing an agenda.
I can see how, with all its pictures (taken out of context, in other cases actually edited to look different than they do in person) and sensationalism, someone with a room temperature IQ could find MotT very compelling. Aside from extensive debunking of the ridiculous claims in his book you can find all over the internet, the man has been uncovered as a South African government agent that has turned state’s evidence during crackdowns on white nationalists.
You are hilariously desperate in trying to discredit Arthur Kemp, but you fail because you lie.
Mr. Kemp wasn’t a “South African government agent” as you claim, he was a state witness on the trial of the assassination of Chris Hani where Mr. Kemp clarified the (public) information of an address book (he was a journalist) of his which contained the, again, public information of the killer Janusz Waluś.
As for the “ridiculous claims in his book MotT”, that is nothing but your opinion regarding history. And opinions don’t matter in the eyes of history.
You would have to be a complete fool to claim the Portugese were not tainted by Negro blood.
‘North African male lineages represent 7.1% of these Portuguese samples, about the same as in the Spanish and Sicilian samples, but far more than in the mainland Italian samples.’
7% NIGGER. ARE YOU ONE?
http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/portuguese.html
Google is full of DNA studies proving the history books to be correct on this matter.
North African does not mean sub-saharan African. Adolf Hitler himself had y-dna that exists in larger numbers in North Africa, and like you, Jews tried to pretend that this meant he was a negro. These are remnants from the neolithic migration, which impacted Europe as a whole, but disproportionately populated Southern Europe.
You’re not a serious person objectively interested in science or history Sven. I don’t really know what your angle is that you willfully lie by claiming North African and Sub-Saharan African are the same thing, but you’ve obviously got malicious intentions.
I just noticed you’re the person narrating as well, it’s astonishing that Andrew Anglin would allow someone like you to bring down the overall IQ of this website with your jaw-droppingly idiotic “If you don’t agree that the Bible says Spartans and Jesus are Nordic you’re not white” bullshit. You’re a greasy looking infantile little misfit trying to vindicate himself in all the wrong ways.
Niggers are Niggers. Portugal will be forever tainted with the blood of its Nigger slaves, as everyone on here knows.
The Bible itself tells you Jesus ancestors were White, fair, ruddy and blue eyed. It also tells you that the Spartans were descended from Judah in the book of Maccabees and Flavius Josephus Histories.
Your insults show you up for exactly what you are, a hopeless mongrel bastard both in body and in mind.
Niggers are Niggers. Portugal will be forever tainted with the blood of its Nigger slaves, as everyone on here knows.
The Bible itself tells you Jesus ancestors were White, fair, ruddy and blue eyed. It also tells you that the Spartans were descended from Judah in the book of Maccabees and Flavius Josephus Histories.
Your insults show you up for exactly what you are, a hopeless mongrel bastard both in body and in mind.
I’m currently reading March of the Titans as well.
It should be required reading for all Nationalists.
http://marchofthetitans.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MaMFo7K3Fc&index=4&list=PLFEFF337BB5F7A30E
The mummies also had red hair and dark brown curly hair.
I named my cat after santiago matamoros 🙂
Another “blond is european, everything else is not” argument? For your information, the blondest of all countries – Sweden is also the most “balkanic” country, in the world after Bosnia, with Romania being 3rd (I2 haplogroup) because of the goth migration.
P.S. 99% of what you call “european civilization” was invented/developed by non-blondes. Look it up. There’s a reason why we make jokes about blondes and why typically blond countries are the best tools the Jew has ever found.
This show is definitely extremely nordicist, and kind of insulting really. It should be said that spain is actually the most genetically homogenous nation in europe and has the highest levels of indo-European DNA in the world. We spaniards also have the 3rd highest average IQ on the planet. To call us stupid is down right ridiculous.
You have to understand that some people on the Daily Stormer want to give it an Anglo-Saxon-centric view in order to inspire the English speaking demographic of Australia, Britain, and America. It’s noble in spirit, but it’s not ethical to do it at other great Aryan people’s expense.
For whatever reason, a few in this scene (not just today, but before WW2 as well) think that you need to repeat Jew slanders about continental Europeans in order to raise the average Anglos self-esteem. While you won’t see it on this site for its NS and pro-Russian leanings, in Anglo-Saxon conservative circles I’ve been in I’ve encountered similar attitudes towards Germans and Russians, with Southern European bashing as well.
It’s really just about historical competitiveness between European ethnic groups. A lot of it has to do with the split between Germanic people’s that went with Protestantism and Latin/Roman Catholicism. The idea that Iberians are negroes and Arabs comes from propaganda produced by British and their Dutch allies during the Eighty Years War, when Spain and Portugal pretty much ruled the world.
This ridiculous assertion that Iberians are uniquely evil and vicious mulattoes that purposely exterminated the Native Americans and Africans unsurprisingly came right after Jews were expelled from Spain and established themselves in the Netherlands. Not long after, the “Black Legend” (look up its history) was born.
With that said, most actual Nordics don’t partake in this petty non-sense . The main anthropologist in the Third Reich Hans Gunther not only gave Mediterraneans the credit they are (according to the overwhelming majority of anthropological, historical, and scientific evidence) due for Greece and Rome, but even admitted that the bona fide Nordic race was in the 20th century a minority tendency even in Germany itself. The Germans were definitely Nordic nationalists (although this wasn’t necessarily a reference to hair or eye color, as Stoddard himself says in his account on his visit to the Third Reich), but they had a lot of respect for Latins as well. “Nordicism” is largely limited to the Anglosphere, and just one more cultural flaw getting in the way of white organizing in this very difficult space. No man that is dumb enough to repeatedly confuse General Francisco Franco for Jose Primo De Rivera can take your people’s history away from you.
Yes, and that IQ encouraged the fallacies of Roman Catholi-schism across most of the world, ‘baptizing’ Amerindian hordes of ready-made slaves to conquer all of South America, and much of North America, for what purpose? To send gold back to Phillip the II, whose inquisition is now the mark of the nadir of ‘catholic piety’, and the Grandees and Conquistadores fucked their way through every pygmy in the Americas, to give us the mulatto mestizo hordes, who are now DESTROYING the USA!??!!?
No creo yo. I blame Spain, Catholi-schism, her false creed, and her universalist cult religion for most of the problems in the USA today. As a former Catholic, I ought to know. I watched So.Cal. become a haven for all the mud races on the planet, given aid and legitimacy by the sodomite RC ‘celibate’ clergy, until the stench of Flips, and Spics drove out the Anglos from all the parishes I worked and worshiped in. Thanks… for nothing.
Not everyone can wave his filthy hands on the balcony next to Stalin, as the holy fucking moscow patriarch did, you piece of stinking shit.
Get lost you fucking filth. You are the one who called Hillary “hitlery”, thereby betraying who you really are.
Last time I checked Anglos converted all their colonial people to Christianity as well. Catholicism is pretty bad, agreed, but Protestantism is a Judaic bomb that has made countries that implement especially susceptible to Jewish influence and domination.
Portuguese people conquered and controlled for centuries places and huge lands such as Azores, Madeira, Brazil, Sao Tome and Principe, Cape Verde Islands, Guinea-Bissau, Angola, Mozambique, Goa Province in India, East Timor, Macau. Possessing a colonial empire means that many young white men would be sent to work and serve in distant lands for years and years and without white women to accompany them. Eventually these white men would get lonely. There is a biological need and desire for female company among most young men. So young white men back then would often turn to amerindian or black women. Because those were the only women they would see in their colonial environments in Brazil, Angola, Mozambique, Cape Verde Islands. In East Timor or Macau, Asian women were only available, and some mixing took place there. Colonialism in the past always lead to some race-mixing. All race-mixed peoples are a by-product or side effect of European peoples having colonial empires. Mestizos and Mulattoes did not exist in white european homelands, but they all existed in the colonies of European nations. It is not all caused by any religion.
That is true, but why single out the Portuguese and Spanish? Average “African-American” is 20% European, and this happened because the British did the same thing. The white settler populations in the British carribbean territories or Guyana have vanished largely due to race-mixing.
In Zimbabwe/Rhodesia and South Africa there is still an Anglo-saxon minority, but every one of the new world states has a largely unmixed Latin minority as well, including Mexico.
That is right. The British settlers who went to the British West Indies in the Caribbean Sea were overwhelmingly male and they were sent there to be soldiers, guards, sugar factory workers, sailors, carpenters, builders. They also seen few white women for years and often got bored and lonely. These British men also did a lot of hard work there. In British, French colonies in Caribbean only black women were only there for company for young males. In Spanish and Portuguese colonies initially Amerindian women were there for companionship. Many white women migrated there later, but in initial stages of colonialism only young strong white men came. Because of this the Spanish conquistador men were the ones who created the first Mestizos. Hernan Cortes had a Maya Indian woman as his lover, Garcilaso de la Vega was Mestizo writer born in 16th century born from a young Spanish nobleman and fighter and from an Incan woman. The term Mestizo first appeared in the 16th century, almost immediately after first colonization. Race mixing can be a consequence of flaws of demographics. People have a biological need to reproduce, men need female company and partnership, if you bring an overwhelmingly young white male population and don’t bring many women, the white males would turn to non-white women out of boredom and no other choices of female partners.
Lol. That’s the anglo-saxon version of history. All the lands owned by Spain were extremely prosperous at the time before the Brits intervened and there’s plenty of books that mention this, including authors like Charles Darwin, Erasmus Darwin and Alexander von Humboldt. Race has nothing to do with it, the problem is forced mass-immigration like we have now, we have to thank the Brits and the Jews for that, the British Elite just can’t take being second place, they only take second place for the Jews. Brits/Jews and brainwashed Americans like the morons who fought against Hitler and the 3rd Reich are responsible for the fucked up situation we find ourselves in.
The difference is that the British people are still either White British or mulatto.
Portugal and Spain have over 5% African adulteration in their blood ON AVERAGE.
If you were White, you would not be making your ridiculous arguments.
“If you were White, you would not be making your ridiculous arguments.” Said the Levantine looking mongoloid.
Only the sectarian offshoots of historic Protestantism. Do you know about the rise of the Dispensationalist heresy? It wasn’t even known before 1830. And it was given legitimacy by aberrant cultic off-shoots, such as the Mormons, Seventh Day Adventists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and similar groups. Had the Protestants not thought themselves better than their ordained clergy, all of this might have died a quick and easy death. In Orthodox lands, and in the Church of England, as well as Germany, this stuff was unknown until about the 1980s, how odd it is.
Your an idiot.
And you can’t even spell….
considering english is my third language I couldn’t care less what a race traitor like you has to say.
Why do you find facts insulting?
It is this exact attitude that is responsible for all the anti-free speech legislation.
they aren’t facts, they are lies from the jewish black legend.
purus, I looked up Sven Longshanks past posts on this site. This guy is one of those clowns that thinks the English are the Jews from the old testament, LOL. They’ve always been around in America on the fringes, the Feds love to infiltrate their groups when they’ve just graduated from Quantico because it attracts suggestible people with pint-sized brains that are very easy to entrap.
you mean that british israelism bullshit? that shit is almost as bad as David Icke with his lizard men.
You show yourself up as knowing nothing about the site, nothing about me, and nothing about any of the subjects you yap about.
You are just here to troll Eric.
Something which you are not very good at.
“P.S. 99% of what you call “european civilization” was invented/developed by non-blondes. Look it up.”
wrong again. ancient Greeks and Romans were blonde too.
Don’t be so gloomy. After all it’s not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love – they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. So long Holly.
I love and respect the Swedes (they’re some of the most aware people in the world right now because of the catastrophe happening in their country), but despite being roughly the same size as Portugal, they haven’t accomplished 1/4 of what the Portuguese have done historically. I’m not going to say this is because the Swedes are mulattoes though, there are many circumstances that go along with racial temperment that influence achievement and the rise and fall of empires.
Latins did not translate well into the industrial revolution for a myriad of reasons, some of them ethnic in origin, but they have always these traits, they don’t come from fucking niggers. Latins are more romantic and intuitive and this is a distraction in the modern world that rewards patience for tediousness, while Germanics are more methodical and do everything by the book even if it seems pointless (most of the time it’s not). Both can be great advantages or disadvantages depending on the period of history you’re in. Within the Germanics there are also very serious differences, a German is vastly different from a British, as is a Spaniard from an Italian.
Stoddard is half-right about Iberians not producing great leaders in recent history, but he concedes Mussolini. Mussolini was as archetypically Latin as can be, and arguably, there would’ve never been a Hitler without him. The Germans took the pageantry, political theories, and even the extremely unGerman tendency of Hitler and Goebbels to gesticulate heavily as is typical of Italians. What the Germans contributed was synthesizing the historical breakthroughs of Mussolini in defeating world Bolshevism and capitalism in Italy with the German’s incredible knack for science and engineering.
Generally, the intuitiveness of Latins is what creates breakthroughs and radical shifts in history, while the Germanic races take these breakthroughs and take them to a higher level thanks to their great organizational and technical talents. There’s no need to be compettitive, when throughout history Western civilization would’ve never existed as we know it today if the Nordic and the Mediterranean did not live in perpetual contact.
That’s why Golden Dawn has led the way in cracking the code to global Jewish hegemony, outsmarting and outwitting them every step of the way while all the Germanic countries are completely dumbfounded. Now it’s up to the Germans to take their lessons, come to power, and make the super-tanks and flying saucer jets needed to take down global ZOG.
Maybe you should try listening before commenting, Stoddard does not view racially adulterated Mediterraneans as Non-White, he just describes them as ‘greatly modified’ and included in that is Nordic and Alpine admixture.
DNA tests done 70 years later proved he was correct on just about all points and are included at the back of the book.
Actually, there was German migration into Northern Portugal, I believe around 400 AD. (It’s well-documented). And as someone who has been there, there are a lot of light complected people with blond’ish hair in Northern Portugal and Northern Spain.
I’m not descended from anyone from either Spain or Portugal, but I get a very high “Southern European” percentage on DNA tests. I’m still trying to figure this one out.
Yeah, he talks about the Germanic migrations. He doesnt even mention the mongrelisation with Moslems, he is far more interested in the Alpine and Nordic streams running through the blood in those areas.
Stoddard doesn’t believe Mediterraneans are non-white, just as long as those Mediterraneans were born in Wales and Ireland like his very Portuguese looking self, haha.
St. Ferdinand of Castile. He made the largest part of the reconquest against moors, making the crusade a success, so he´s a Saint.
Most people do not realize the Reconquista was a Crusade, and that Crusades continued into the 18th Century, under the Holy Leagues (in Spanish, Liga Santa, Santa Liga, Liga Católica) organized by the Pope.
So you are spanish too? I know that because I´m. Lepanto´s Battle took place under the Holy league banner. Sometimes I think about how many things we have in comon with Bulgarians, Romanians, Hungarians, Greeks and Balkans. Because of our struggle against Islam and muslims and because our will to resist their occupation and expulse them from our lands. We defended Europe and Christianity once, but now, both our countries and theese far from Islam are under siege, this time jews are the ones behind it.
the jews were behind the conquest of España back then as well, brother. it is a fact that it was the jews who invited the moors to the fatherland and it was the jews who betrayed us and opened the gates of our cities and turned over our nobles for summary execution. the moorish scum even left them behind as an occupying force during their initial invasion of the Frankreich. the jews have always been behind every movement to destroy the aryan race, and they always will be. our forebears hated them for a good reason.
Yeah, they sent letters, both before te invasion and after the reconquest, First inviting Moors and later doing the very same inviting turks. They opened the gates of Constantinople too, one major lost that nowadays still remains in infidel hands. But nothing like Holy Land, there the filthy jews are free to commit their infamies against our faith and race, as they do taking white slav women to Tel-Aviv in record numbers to be their sexual slaves. David duke talk abou this in Israel, promise land for organized crime. But there´s nothing new, as they´ve been top slave traders always.
Most Sephardic Jews were expelled from Spain and Portugal in the 15th century. Most of them went and settled down elsewhere in Europe and North Africa. Many Sephardic Jews went to the Greek city of Thessaloniki and became a majority of the population in that city and huge Jewish population remained in Thessaloniki until the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Thessaloniki back then was part of the Ottoman Empire and Ottoman Turkish forces recently conquered it from the Greeks. Another part of Sephardic Jews migrated to Muslim lands such as Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Libya. Sephardic Jews were a merchant elite on the Barbary Coast. Significant numbers of Sephardic Jews migrated to the Ottoman Empire and settled in cities such as Constantinople, Izmir, Adana, they also settled in what was then Ottoman province of Syria. Spanish did not kill the Sephardic Jews and they were allowed to peacefully migrate elsewhere. Jews were happy to live in Ottoman Empire.
You know a lot about them. I knew most of it, but not all you said. Thank you. Some of them speak Ladino, wich is a kind of hibrid between hebrew and spanish, just like the did with german speaking yiddish. But Ladino speakers were sephardic while yiddish speakers were Ashkenazim jews and developed their language centuries after Sephardim developed Ladino.
I occasionally read the jewish encyclopedia. Just for fun. Want to know what they think about themselves. In their opinion expulsion from Spain in 1492 was not a disaster because by migrating to the Ottoman Empire and to Morocco, they got new opportunities. Many of these Sephardic Jews also went to the Netherlands and to Britain, once the protestant reformation took place. British political leader Oliver Cromwell had a bizarre admiration for jews. Protestant Whites welcomed Jews in later in 17th century. They would get expelled out of one country, but somebody else would later welcome them in. Benjamin Disraeli and David Ricardo were descendants of Sephardic Jews and in Britain they became influential politicians and economists. Jews themselves say that Protestant countries tolerated them more than Catholic countries did. In Britain and in Netherlands many of them lived for several centuries.
I knew that, it happened despite Martin Luther wrote “On the jews and their lies”, but once you replace the Pope´s authority with nothing… They got infildtrated as fast as Luther died.
Christian divission is an adventage to them, We should be seen as a block, Catholics, Orthodox and Protestants, but those have been savagely framented and Hijacked by jews, specially 50.000.000 evangelical in United States, which alloe them change the course of elections.
After the Spanish expelled the Sephardic Jews, one city in Greece was settled and dominated by the jews for 400 years after 1492. The city of Thessaloniki or Salonica or Selanik in Turkish became a 50-60% jewish city. Thessaloniki for 400 years was called “The Jerusalem of the Balkans”. In this city the majority of the population spoke Ladino. Nicolas Sarkozy’s maternal ancestors were Sephardic Jews from Thessaloniki. Carrasso business family, which owns the Dannon Corporation (the one that makes yogurts and dairy products in Europe) were Sephardic Jews from Thessaloniki. Salonica Greeks became a small minority in the Ottoman Empire, and Jews were the true rulers of Thessaloniki for centuries. It was only in late 19th and 20th centuries that the Greeks became a majority in Thessaloniki, and Sephardic Jews migrated to France and Israel and left Thessaloniki. Jews say that Thessaloniki in Greek Macedonia was paradise for Sephardic Jews in the Ottoman Empire.
This is the part I didn´t know about. It´s fascinating. I knew about them moving to the Ottoman empire, but I used to think it was in Turkey, not in European side of the empire, and didn´t know about Thessaloniki as their fortress, in particular. As I knew Sarkozy was jew descendent from balkans, but not that details…
One more reason to desire Golden Down rise, for historical justice and compensation of the suffering those sephardic jews surely inflicted on greek population, as they did in Spain before, when infamous jew Maiomonides wrote his shamefull code in Spain, they surely wrote, spoke and did many other infamies on greek population.
Thessaloniki was not always a Jewish fortress. Jews were majority in that city until 19th century. Thessaloniki declined in it’s role as a Jewish fortress later in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Indigenous Greek population increased over time because Ottoman authorities in the 19th century decided to allow more Greeks and Slavs in as craftsmen, carpenters, workers and to sell food products for the growing city. Many Greeks migrated from rural parts of the Balkans, thus Greek percentage of population grew and the Jewish percentage declined over time. There was a huge local Greek uprising in 1821, many Ottoman Turkish policemen and soldiers got wounded or killed in the Greek revolt. Ottoman Empire declined culturally, geopolitically, socially and economically during the 19th century. Local sephardic jews began to notice this and they began to migrate to other countries where there were more economic opportunities. By early 20th century, Greek population of Thessaloniki was again in the majority, and jews were in the small minority, they were just 19% by 1913. Thessaloniki was a multiethnic cosmopolitan city with Greek majority, and significant Jewish, Turkish, Slavic minorities when Greek troops finally took it from Ottoman Turkish forces in 1912. Many local Sephardic Jews chose to migrate to France in 19th and 20th centuries in search of economic opportunities in tens of thousands. French Third Republic had a more liberal and lenient citizenship legislation, allowing jews to become French citizens. Number of Jews in Thessaloniki declined further due to the 1917 Great Fire which by accident destroyed many of older jewish buildings. More of these Jews went to France, Britain and Netherlands. Remaining jews from this city largely fled to what is now Israel during World War II or they were deported to concentration camps, or they became refugees. Many of these WWII Salonica Jewish refugees ended up in USA. Now few jews live there. They simply migrated elsewhere.
Was it accidental the fire which destroyed many older jew buildings? It´s happen from time to time here and there, and it´s been justified anger from local population.
Wow I had never heard this before. Thanks for the history lessons.