June 19, 2017
Republicans never really do anything that I like, so I’m not holding my breath here.
Be nice to see this bitch get locked up though.
The thing is… she would sell out Obama, and if she sold out Obama, that would end up selling out this whole Russian hoax conspiracy that was planned against Trump on his watch. That’s why they never followed-up on the Susan Rice unmasking.
When it was released by Mike Cernovich that Susan Rice was behind the illegal unmasking of Michael Flynn, as well as the illegal compiling of intelligence reports on the Trump team AFTER the election?
Then remember when nothing happened to her?
None of these niggers are ever going to get punished for their crimes, because if they go down, their kike masters go down with them.
Senate Republicans are clamoring to hear from Loretta Lynch after former FBI Director James Comey raised concerns about her involvement in the Hillary Clinton email investigation.
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee are seizing on Comey’s testimony earlier this month that he was concerned over the former attorney general telling the FBI to refer to the Clinton investigation as a “matter,” which resembled the Clinton campaign line.
The move could allow Republicans to attempt to pivot away from the investigation into Russia’s election meddling — which top GOP lawmakers have signaled belongs to the Intelligence Committee — and focus on Lynch, who has long been a target of Republicans.
Sen. John Cornyn (Texas), the No. 2 Senate Republican who is a member of both the Intelligence and Judiciary committees, said it “would be very helpful” for Lynch to testify before the Judiciary panel, which oversees the Justice Department.
“Frankly, a lot of what Hillary Clinton was exposed to by Director Comey’s misconduct and the way he handled that was apparently in response to his lack of confidence in the attorney general, and I think there is a lot we could learn from that,” Cornyn said.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) also wants to hear from Lynch and is pushing for the Judiciary Committee to “get more involved.”
“The accusations now that … the current and former attorney general were political — that has nothing to do with Russia as much as it has to do with how the Department of Justice is being run,” he said. “I want to find out all about that.”
The fact that Little Lindsey is talking about it means there is no chance it is ever going to happen.
He never gets involved with anything that could actually cause any disruption in the system at all.
Well, either that, or it’s already been decided that it will happen. That’s also technically possible.
A spokesman for Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the Judiciary Committee chairman, stressed that no decisions have been made and staffers needed to first “gather evidence.”
But the spokesman said it was “likely” after Comey’s remarks before the intelligence panel that Lynch’s testimony before the Judiciary Committee “will become necessary at some point.”
President Trump has seized on the Obama administration official as the federal investigation into possible ties between his campaign and Russia heats up.
“A.G. Lynch made law enforcement decisions for political purposes…gave Hillary Clinton a free pass and protection. Totally illegal!” Trump tweeted this week.
Other Trump allies, including the Republican National Committee, have also questioned Lynch’s behavior.
“Why is no one investigating Attorney General Lynch’s Department of Justice for obstruction of justice in the Clinton email investigation. .. .There is compelling evidence to back up the claim that AG Lynch engaged in obstruction of justice,” read one RNC talking point leaked to a Washington Post reporter this week.
The talking points were in response to a Post report that after Comey’s firing last month, special counsel Robert Mueller is investigating whether Trump obstructed justice.
With the “I hope…” comment.
Just in case you forgot.
That’s what they’re talking about.
A spokesman for Sen. Ted Cruz said the Texas Republican would “absolutely” support Lynch testifying.
“Well, I kind of would like to get the whole thing behind us, but she should be interrogated [by a committee] because there’s some real questions about whether her actions were proper,” Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) said when asked if Lynch should testify as part of a larger obstruction of justice probe.
Comey apparently raised concerns about Lynch before he was fired. He told the Judiciary Committee in early May that he had been worried the Justice Department couldn’t “credibly” decline to prosecute Clinton without “grievous damage to the American people’s confidence in the justice system.”
He also privately told Intelligence Committee members that he confronted Lynch on whether she had agreed to shut down the FBI’s investigation. Comey worried her controversial meeting with former President Bill Clinton had created a conflict of interest, according to Circa, a website tracked closely by conservative media.
Though GOP lawmakers have long been wary of Lynch, placing her back in the spotlight could backfire if it also keeps the public’s focus on Comey amid continued fallout over the FBI chief’s firing in early May.
Grassley has signaled that potential obstruction of justice during the Obama administration should be included in the committee’s work. The GOP chairman has argued that such a move is relevant because the Trump White House initially pointed to Comey’s handling of the Clinton email investigation to justify his firing.
“The Committee is examining the removal of Director Comey and allegations of improper influence on the FBI’s handling of the Russia and Clinton email investigations. In his recent appearances before both the Senate Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, Mr. Comey raised issues about whether these investigations were subjected to inappropriate political influence,” said Taylor Foy, a spokesman for the Iowa Republican.
Any push to pivot to Lynch and the Clinton email investigation would also likely spark pushback from Democrats, who are increasingly frustrated by the lack of progress on the committee’s push to get answers on Russia’s election interference and Comey’s firing.
Are they though?
Or is no answers the whole agenda?
On that level, involving Lynch, if it’s been decided nothing is going to happen to her anyway, could just serve to drag this out further, making it more and more complicated.
He still has 1/3rd of the country – white men and some married white women – that is hardcore behind him 6 million percent.
He should just demand that evidence is presented to the American people upon which this whole thing is supposedly based. If they can’t do that, he should just shut it down.
It’s already been established that he has the power to dismiss Mueller.