Richard Spencer and the Jew Kunstler

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 3, 2015

james howard kunstler
james howard kunstler

The Jew James Howard Kunstler, on his blog Clusterfuck Nation, has an article up about Donald Trump entitled “Worse Than Hitler.”

It is not the typical Jew screeching about “a new Holocaust” that you would expect from such a title by a Jew, but rather is something much more clever.

Yes. Actual headline.
Yes. Actual headline.

For those unfamiliar with Kunstler, he is a niche-filler who claims to be neither left nor right. He is mostly known by those in the know as a peddler of confusing Jew nonsense couched as “reasonable alternative analysis.”

The Jew Kunstler begins by telling us that he understands Trump’s positions on immigration, and likes that he’s raising real issues, trying to indicate that the title of the piece – which again, is “Worse Than Hitler” – is ironic in some way.

Immigration is a practical problem, with visible effects on-the-ground, easy to understand. I’m enjoying the Trump-provoked debate mostly because it is a pushback against the disgusting dishonesty of political correctness that has bogged down the educated classes in a swamp of sentimentality. For instance, Times Sunday Magazine staffer Emily Bazelon wrote a polemic last week inveighing against the use of the word “illegal” applied to people who cross the border without permission on the grounds that it “justifies their mistreatment.” One infers she means that sending them back where they came from equals mistreatment.

Oh so he’s disagreeing with the goofy liberal Jewess Emily Bazelon – maybe he’s one of those “good Jews” I’ve been hearing so much about.

Right?

If he’s disagreeing with a liberal Jew, he must be one of those.

I mean, right?

It’s refreshing that Trump is able to cut through this kind of tendentious crap. If that were his only role, it would be a good one, because political correctness is an intellectual disease that is making it impossible for even educated people to think — especially people who affect to be political leaders. Trump’s fellow Republicans are entertainingly trapped in their own cowardliness and it’s fun to watch them squirm.

Hey, wow – I agree with that entire paragraph!

He must be the good Jew we’ve been searching for!

But wait a second here…

But for me, everything else about Trump is frankly sickening, from his sneering manner of speech, to the worldview he reveals day by day, to the incoherence of his rhetoric, to the wolverine that lives on top of his head. The thought of Trump actually getting elected makes me wonder where Arthur Bremer is when we really need him.

Wow, that was an abrupt turn!

Now he is openly calling for Trump to be assassinated!

For those who don’t know, Arthur Bremer is the guy who attempted to assassinate Georgia politician and White Rights activist George Wallace while he was running for President in 1972.

Arthur Bremer, following the assassination attempt which left George Wallace paralyzed.
Arthur Bremer, following the assassination attempt which left George Wallace paralyzed.

The next several paragraphs of Kunstler’s piece is a rambling bit of nonsense about how he thinks The Donald is a silly person and how he doesn’t like the way he uses language. He even mocks his hair, and implies he isn’t really that good at building buildings.

He then says that Trump would start wars, because other people in other countries wouldn’t like him, (apparently because of his personality and manner of speech).

Trump’s notion that he can push around world leaders such as Vladimir Putin by treating them as though they were president of the Cement Workers’ Union ought to give thoughtful people the vapors. It doesn’t seem to occur to Trump that other countries could easily get pugnacious towards us. He would have us in a world war before the inaugural parade was over.

No elaboration on this is provided. It is just “well, the guy is goofy, he’ll start a war with someone somehow, someone better kill him quick.”

The Jew finally concludes:

The trouble is that it’s not inconceivable Trump could get elected. Farfetched, perhaps, but not out of the question. The USA is heading for a very rough patch of history — as those of you with your eyes on the stock indexes lately may suspect. The country stands an excellent chance of waking up some morning soon to discover it is broke and broken. When that happens, all the anxiety and animus will be focused on looking for scapegoats, and they are likely to be the wrong ones. World leaders considered Hitler a clown in the early going, too, you know. But the Germans were wild about him. He pushed a lot of the right buttons under the circumstances. Trump is worse than Hitler. And the American people, alas, are now surely a worse lot of ignorant, raging, tattooed slobs than the German people were in 1933. Be very afraid.

Oh. So it really was about how Trump is worse than Hitler, and the first bits that the title was meant to be ironic were just a fake-out.

I see…

For those with eyes to see, seeing is not hard. Kunstler is simply another Jewish ethnic activist, acting out against Donald Trump, trying to thwart the man who has become the symbol of White America rising.

He comes at you like “oh yes, goyim, I’m on your side about immigration, and this political correctness of my fellow Jews has gotten very silly, but you see, stupid goyim, if you elect Trump as your President, something really bad could happen. He has a bad personality and he could maybe start a war or something – just like Hitler, who was the most evil man in history.”

"He's not really the New Hitler, goyim, no, no, now. Goyim, he is the New Hitler.
“He’s not really the New Hitler, goyim, no, no, now. Goyim, he is the New Hitler.

In short, Kustler is no different than the goofy Jews whining about how evil Trump is for being a racist. Because the words of Jews don’t actually mean anything. The pro-immigration Jews who hate Trump don’t really care about the brown people, and this anti-immigration Jew who hates Trump doesn’t really care about stopping immigration.

All that any of these people care about is destroying White people. And right now, it looks like Trump is at least claiming to have a plan to do a lot to help White people.

They will come from every angle. So you must be alert. You must be vigilant. Whenever you hear something against Trump, look for the hooked-nose behind the curtain.

Richard Spencer Agrees with Kustler (I Guess)

Richard Spencer, conference organizer and blogger
Richard Spencer, conference organizer and blogger

Much more bizarre than the Jew claiming Trump should be assassinated because he has a goofy personality is that Richard Spencer, a pro-White activist and blogger, apparently agrees with Kustler.

Over at Radix Journal, Spencer has a piece responding to the Kustler piece entitled “Something for Nothing.”

Selection_182

Strangely, the article does not mention that Kustler is a Jew, nor make comment on the call for Trump to be assassinated.

Stranger still, the commentary Spencer offers doesn’t really seem to relate directly, or even indirectly, to what the Jew Kustler is saying.

Spencer begins:

James Howard Kunstler’s latest article on the Trump phenomenon is entitled “Worse Than Hitler.” It’s hard to read that headline and not conclude that Kunstler has become a parody of the uptight, shrill, self-righteous, delusional liberal intellectual . . . or alternatively, a conservative.

But, in fact, the title is a head-fake. Kunstler (who’s neither Left nor Right) is one of the few who actually gets immigration.

As I stated above, the title of the piece was not a fake-out, the article merely begins by implying that it is, then concludes with the claim that yes, Trump is actually worse than Hitler. Disturbing that Spencer doesn’t see fit to note this (maybe he didn’t read the whole article?).

I am also disturbed by the fact that Spencer simply takes a Jew media figure – not known for being a particularly honest bunch – at his word that he is opposed to immigration, even while in the context of a vilification (and call for the assassination of) the only Presidential candidate who is vocally opposing immigration.

Having quoted Kunstler’s attacks on Trump’s person (which I didn’t bother to quote above, because they were childish and seemingly without meaning), Spencer begins his commentary (which, again, does not appear to follow directly from the Kunstler article:

In July, Jeb Bush said that, in order to reach his arbitrary GDP growth goals, Americans would have to “work longer hours.” His statement was so rhetorically stupid that I almost appreciated his honesty.

Trump, on the other hand, promises “new management.” With Trump, along with the “amazing” “superstars” he’ll hire, Americans will get better “deals” with Mexico and China. In other words, something (in this case, national greatness) for nothing.

Why is the word “deals” in quotations? Is this meant to imply that trade deals are not an actual thing? I don’t know. What I do know is that international trade deals are indeed an actual thing, and that a globalist – and disproportionately Jewish – capitalist elite has employed underhanded and criminal methods to negotiate abhorrently unfair trade deals, for the express purpose of robbing America of the wealth it has worked for generations to acquire.

Giving us back some of our wealth by renegotiating these trade deals would not be “something for nothing,” any more than if a Black guy steals your bicycle – which you worked all summer to save up and buy – and the police bring it back to you, you would have been given “something for nothing.”

I am completely unclear on how this would not be obvious to anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of what NAFTA, GATT and now TPP have done to American industry and, in turn, national wealth and, in turn, “national greatness.”

Spencer continues:

Rhetorically, it’s brilliant. That said, the usual GOP bullshit about “opportunity” and America being a place where “anyone can do anything” has a built in fail-safe. If your life doesn’t turn out as planned in a Republican utopia, you weren’t working hard enough or you didn’t dream big enough. Trump promises that your life will be better because Trump will make it better.

Trump promises that lives will be better because he will change the ideology under which America presently functions.

It is simply an objective fact that America is hemorrhaging wealth and opportunity, on both the personal and the national level, because of a corrupt elite which has sold us out.

A successful renegotiation of trade deals designed to remove manufacturing jobs from America would, objectively, bring jobs back to America.

Stopping corporations from using H1B visas to replace American tech workers with lower-paid employees from India would, objectively, result in fewer Americans losing their jobs to H1B visa Indians. And this would not be giving them “something for nothing,” it would simply stop the government from working with corporations to take away their jobs.

I personally have no idea if Trump will actually do any of this if he is elected. And I do believe a discussion about whether or not Trump would indeed do these things he is promising is a very valid discussion, and one we need to be having. But that is not what Spencer is talking about here.

In actual fact, Spencer does not appear to be talking about anything at all.

188 comments

  1. “He even mocks his hair, and implies he isn’t really that good at building buildings.”

    You jealous little bitch, lets go the evidence… you lose jew clown.

  2. “But for me, everything else about Trump is frankly sickening, from his sneering manner of speech, to the worldview he reveals day by day, to the incoherence of his rhetoric, to the wolverine that lives on top of his head. The thought of Trump actually getting elected makes me wonder where Arthur Bremer is when we really need him.”

    -Ok, so the the jew’s entire article is based on his penis envy of The Donald. These days so many libs and jews don’t even try to make sound political arguments. They don’t even hide that their opinion is just playground jealousy and silliness.-

  3. “Trump is worse than Hitler”

    This is an entirely true statement. Trump is a Jew lover after all.

  4. “Stopping corporations from using H1B visas to replace American tech workers with lower-paid employees from India would, objectively, result in fewer Americans losing their jobs to H1B visa Indians. And this would not be giving them “something for nothing,” it would simply stop the government from working with corporations to take away their jobs.”

    Stopping the visas and non-white immigration is good, but I disagree with the anti-free trade thing. Yes restricting imports would save some people’s jobs but it would also likely make the cost of living for everyone in America rise substantially. Preventing new advanced technology from being developed would also save the jobs of people who are employed manufacturing already existing technology but is this desirable?

  5. “Spencer begins his commentary (which, again, does not appear to follow directly from the Kunstler article:”

    Dickie Spencer and the gang at Radix never address the Jewish question with any substance and barely publish anything that exposes the current and past activities of Jews, and never in a way that clearly explains the nature of the Jewish problem. They are hobbyists, essayists and dilletantes and intellectual fart sniffers.

  6. “the article does not mention that Kustler is a Jew”

    Dickie Spencer has made a career avoiding the JQ – one might even say misdirecting people from it.

  7. One of Kuntsler’s stock epithets is “Corn-pone Nazi” by which he can mock both American Southerners and Germans.

  8. I sure hope when the day comes and all the anti-jew kikes come out of the wood work, they all get treated the same way the jews treat the goyim for not doing enough to save them from the holohoax.

    Stand fast boys and keep a hard heart. The jew gene is anti white.

  9. Trump is worse than Hitler. I don’t think Hitler would have blame Americas problems on the Japanese, the Chinese or the Mexicans. Hitler would have blamed the international pharisee banker/merchants.

    You have to play the hand you have been dealt. Christian white America has been dealt poor hands (Romney, McCain) and folded. They have been dealt good hands (2010, 2014 elections) and still lost badly.

    In a fixed game, the dealer is going to let the rube win a hand here and there before the rube realizes what is going on and walks out or pulls his pistol.

  10. Hail Victory!

  11. My comments not allowed or something ?

  12. Glad Anglin is outing Spencer for the Jew cuckified coward he actually is. He is no supporter of our movement.

  13. I just visited Raddix. Richard Spencer is an absolute idiot!!! You can tell he thinks he is brilliant. He is definitely an amren type of guy. I barely made through a minute of his cuckservative podcast. Who the fuck would give him any money? Oh, maybe a jew would.

  14. Jew said:
    Saddam was worse than Hitler. Gaddafi was worse than Hitler. George W Bush was worse than Hitler. Assad is worse than Hitler. Putin is worse than Hitler. Idi Amin was worse than Hitler. Achmedinejad was worse than Hitler. Now Trump is worse than Hitler.
    Christ almighty already, you fucking boring and self-righteous jewish cunts!
    The buzzword to control the dumb goy sheep: call someone the jew doesn’t like a “Hitler” to achieve the desired result. Anyone else tired of that shit yet?
    Throw this fuckhead into the oven!

  15. Americans are getting kike-raped in every hole.

    • Has he given money to Trump?

      No, he hasn’t.

      Why wuld a ‘Russian nationalist’ be such a hardcore jew-snake and try to demoralize Americans?

      Your boy Putin has run the gauntlet of globalist Jew Agendas…He picks on the homo community of Russia that has no power.

      Yay, What an awesome guy.

      The “savior” of the white race…even though he wants to throw you in prison for denying the holocaust and opened the flood gates for third world immigration.

      Now he takes an ‘intafada’ position somewhat in international affairs…Although he still keeps “friendly relations” with Israel for the most part.

    • Has he given money to Trump?

      No, he hasn’t.

      Why wuld a ‘Russian nationalist’ be such a hardcore jew-snake and try to demoralize Americans?

      Your boy Putin has run the gauntlet of globalist Jew Agendas…He picks on the homo community of Russia that has no power.

      Yay, What an awesome guy.

      The “savior” of the white race…even though he wants to throw you in prison for denying the holocaust and opened the flood gates for third world immigration.

      Now he takes an ‘intafada’ position somewhat in international affairs…Although he still keeps “friendly relations” with Israel for the most part.

      • does not make Trump any better serving Netanyahu openly. I can only say we need to get our act together and profit from Trump and push our ideas on his wave, but we should not expect him to do anything against the jews. The jews run him as a default strategy, it was tested in europe with UKIP, LE Pen daughter, Wiilders, PEGIDA, Sweden dems, FPÖ… all “right wing” but sucking up to jews. The idea is to infuse as much philosemitism into the right as possible to cover their tracks on their path of destruction. Sad thing is it works in europe, has to be seen if it works in the USA, becuse you have more free speech and you and others can call the jew out in this whole process. So it might backfire at some point for them. Hope so.

      • “Has he given money to Trump? No, he hasn’t.”

        hHe is rich enough not to have to ask for money, that is all. It is clear as day that he agrees with and supports the fat rat jew Adelson’s positions, from this twitter message.

  16. Guess he’s not as smart or brave as you thought he was.

    🙂

  17. If Trump wins though White Americans will go back to sleep having a false sense of security that Trump will make America “right” again. Whereas if Hillary gets in her social policies will continue to radicalize White Americans like the last 2 years since Ferguson. As Dr. William Pierce has previously explained… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2s1cWzssQQ

  18. THE KIKE’S WHORE SPENCER CUCKS FOR KIKES

    THE KIKE’S WHORE SPENCER OPENLY AND SARCASTICALLY LAUGHS AT “JEWISH CONSPIRACY THERIES”

    THE KIKE’S WHORE SPENCER LOVES AND ADMIRES KIKES

    Jewgle search: “richard spencer” “paul gottfried”

    National Policy Institute – Paul Gottfried, professor at Elizabethtown College joins Richard Spencer to discuss the trajectory of

    National Report with Richard Spencer – Alt Right Media – John Derbyshire and Paul Gottfried join Richard Spencer to discuss the firing of Jason Richwine and race

    Richard Spencer – Vimeo – Property and Freedom Society Bodrum, Turkey – Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Richard Spencer, Paul Gottfried

    RADIX II: The Great Purge | The Occidental Observer – the journal’s publisher and editor, Richard Spencer, drawing in …. Not surprisingly given Paul Gottfried’s comment, Kirk’s statement …

    Great interview with Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer | ‘Ron Paul, Rothbard, Race’

    The Mencken Club hlmenckenclub.org/ Clockwise, beginning at top left: Pat Buchanan, Paul Gottfried, Richard Spencer, E. Christian Kopff and guest, HL Mencken, Steve Sailer and John Derbyshire.

    Did you catch Richard Spencer and Paul Gottfried last week?

    Do you think Richard Spencer and self hating Jew Paul Gottfried are gay lovers.

    Richard Spencer – Taki’s Magazine – Richard Spencer is the executive editor of the Alternative Right webzine and former … A friend of Paul Gottfried sent Takimag this report from his last trip to the

    A Critic Replies to Paul Gottfried – Majorityrights – Paul Gottfried, professor of humanities at Elizabethtown College. Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer, author of

    The Great Purge: The Deformation of the Conservative … Peter Brimelow, Lee Congdon, John Derbyshire, Samuel T. Francis, Paul Gottfried, James Kalb, Keith Preston, William Regnery, and Richard Spencer.

    Alternative Right – RationalWiki

    Vimeo — Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Richard Spencer, Marco Bassani, Paul Gottfried, Richard Lynn

    Two “Conservative” Jews, Same “Liberal” Dissembling | toqonline In “The Myth of ‘Judeo-Christian Values,’” Paul Gottfried writes:

    Richard Spencer Launches Alternative Right | The presence of articles by Robert Weissberg and Paul Gottfriedindicates that Alternative Right is not a clone of TOQ or The Occidental …

    Nationalists Without a Nation – Taki’s Magazine – Jared Taylor’s recent posting on Takimag has drawn a number of a responses, including from Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer, both of …

    NATIONALISTS WITHOUT BORDERS – Webster University – Paul Gottfried, Tomislav Sunic, and Alain de Benoist…disciple Richard Spencer

    Richard Spencer’s neo-pagan, anti-Christian readers — Good for Richard Spencer … The same for Paul Gottfried, who is a believing Jew.

    American racists to speak at Traditional Britain Conference – searchlight magazine – Paul Gottfried … University-educated and well-to-do, Richard Spencer is part of a new generation of leaders trying to reshape the image of …

    Radix Journal @RadixJournal Jun 15. Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer discuss David Brat, Iraq, and the “politics of angst.”

    Incredible interview of Richard Spencer and Dr. Paul Gottfried on The Political Cesspool Radio

  19. RamzPaul going at it again. Of course he doesn’t outright call them out, but as he says “You know who I’m talking about”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yML623dcSj8

  20. P.s to my previous comment . I have left a couple of comments that are designed to draw the discussion towards our concerns . Check out Ebola1900s reply comment to my reply to his . I have just posted another comment and typed the Spectre comment .
    It appears that many are still in confusion about Jews being a religion rather than a matrilineal ethnic tribe ( theyre not strictly a race .)

    Some stormers already on there judging by some of the avatars .

  21. How is Dick Spencer pro-White? What has he done to improve the lives of Whites? He’s a whore for The Kike. He says his “mentor” is that extra-repulsive shit-kike Paul Gottfried. Spencer’s just another effete alt-kike whore.

  22. In a different article in the comments section , another comrade alerted me to this ,

    https://disqus.com/home/channel/dailynewsheadlines/discussion/channel-dailynewsheadlines/are_jews_loved_by_god_more_then_the_rest_of_us/

    Check the comments please men . Its hotting up on there .

    Lookout for Ebola1900 . I believe that he is a Jew .

  23. I think you can look at it from several angles. Spencer is engaging in the content of Kuntsler’s piece while ignoring his motivations (advancing a Jewish agenda). This has to do with Spencer being more intellectual and lacking the good sense to just denounce him as a Jew.

    Anglin on the other hand puts too much faith in politicians .sometimes and seems to see what he wants to see (Putin as savior of the white race LOL, https://www.destroyzionism.com/2014/07/25/putin-jews-link-compilation/)

  24. Glad the DS awarded Mr. Kunstler the “Golden Star” (in photo). Makes it easier to identify and round these Orcs when the time comes.

  25. This is the type of material I have come to expect from Spencer and his circle[Taylor, Liddell, etc.]. These folks may be pro-White but they are certainly not populists and as another poster has stated, Spencer and his associates are actually elitist snobs that fairly frequently state their implicit disdain for the White working and middle classes. Good luck accomplishing anything as an activist leader with that as a feature in your weltanschauung, especially if one is of the opinion that we will eventually need to mobilize an armed resistance movement or at least have street crews providing muscle. I seriously am of the opinion that Spencer & Co. fancy themselves some sort of aristocracy who we will fight and die for because pretentious articles.

    These guys have no fire in their belly and seem to be content with endless mental masturbation. I suspect they expect the working and middle class whites they hold in relative contempt to be the vanguard actually putting in work which they can co-opt upon victory and declare themselves royalty or the like. Not gonna happen.

    Also, just a small correction: George Wallace was from Alabama, not Georgia.

    • Every other community college in AL is named after George or his wife (first female governor in the U.S. I believe). Wonder how long that will last. Good catch on that, Georgia doesn’t get to claim him.

      And with friends like Taylor and co. The Jews barely need to brainwash…the prowhite “leaders” take care of it for them. I reiterate, Taylor is 100x worse than jones. “I agree there are absolutely some zionist Jews in the NWO using their brilliance for dominance and evil”
      Words you will never, ever, hear Jared Taylor say. But he gets his picture placed in honor here while jones gets (justly) roasted for hypocrisy even though he does at least publically agree to a certain extent.

  26. The Jew Kunstler begins by telling us that he understands Trump’s positions on immigration, and likes that he’s raising real issues, trying to indicate that the title of the piece – which again, is “Worse Than Hitler” – is ironic in some way.

    The poisonous neo-Cohen William Krystal was spewing the same exact jew babble 2 months ago about Trump.

    It’s likely this is a “mini conspiracy” that the AIPAC “right wing” of international Jewry have cooked up against Trump.

  27. “Many Enemies Bring Much Honour”..

    The title is an English translation of an Italian Fascist motto. At first glance it may not appear to make much sense, after all, how does having many enemies have anything to do with honour?

    But when you break it down it does make a great deal of sense. Apply it in practical terms. If you are against Jewish power and Jewish supremacy then you are going to invite many enemies. If you are against third world immigration, the homosexual lobbyists, if you object to holocaustianity and sodomy being taught a school ….then you are, by definition, going to induce many enemies.

    However, since being anti Jew power and since taking a stance against those other things is unquestionably honourable, then the more enemies you make in challenging those things, the more honourable positions you are clearly taking.

    You would make zero enemies if you just bent over and took it from the Jews, you would make no enemies if you rainbow washed you avatar and let the World know how great faggotry is, and you would make no enemies peddling holocaust lies.

    In terms of an easy life, those positions are safe.

    You would be a whore though. I prefer not to be a whore to group think, organised Jewry, or any of the other things I mentioned. Which means I have a lot of enemies and potential enemies.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JjDb5OewYco

  28. Trump? Worse than Hitler? YES, without a doubt!

    I absolutely agree with Kunstler’s “Worse Than Hitler” assessment of Trump.

    Trump will never be as good as Hitler — but I wouldn’t discourage him from trying.

  29. Jews in Israel bury Palestinians kids alive. Reverse the situation, the Jews would be screaming “holocaust”

    https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=769273379788436&fref=nf

  30. When will the Jews admit to running and controlling the slave trade?

  31. I never liked Spencer. Fuck him.

  32. Neoreactionaries can’t be trusted. They are effete “intellectuals” who are attracted to the right edge of the mainstream. They worship Menachem Moldberg, whose plan was for us all to openly surrender to Fnargildberg, who would then suppress the dindu street crime jihad and permit right-thinking goyim to live in the cities.

    Other than pseudo-edgelords, neoreactionaries are cucktian faggots babbling endlessly about metaphysical questions while implicitly denying race.

    The Dark Enlightenment has moved on, leaving the neoreactionaries behind.

    • For me, it isn’t necessarily even about Jews in this case, though I think it is bizarre to quote a Jew and then pretend he’s saying something different than he actually is.

      But the response is my issue. Acting as though Americans, who have had their entire country sold out from underneath them, are somehow whiners for saying “wait, can we have our country back?”

      • The neoreactinaries are rootless cosmopolitans who “discovered” that the promises rootless cosmopolitans made to ordinary people were bullshit and other promises were needed to continue the One World project. The new One World contains official discrimination based on IQ and criminal status, but otherwise preserves the rest of the cosmopolitan project.

  33. BREAKING NEWS

    An Anti White Bitch under the name of Katie Whyte has created a petition to allow more non whites into Britain!!!!

    I can’t bloody believe that many anti Whites are signing it!!!

    If you don’t believe me, Look at it!
    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/105991

    Absolutely DISGRACEFUL!!!
    Please press upvote because we need more white nationalists to be aware of it. Hopefully Andrew Anglin or someone will write up an article about it!!!

    EDIT:
    I found out that the retarded bitch in Scotland is calling for more non whites into Scotland!!!
    http://news.stv.tv/scotland/1327991-sturgeon-scotland-will-do-everything-possible-to-help-refugees/
    Her Twitter is @NicolaSturgeon Please, I urge you White Nationalists to do something. Angelo John Gage, if you’re reading, we desperately need a National Youth Front for Britain!

  34. The only time I’m ever gonna believe that organized jewry hates/dislikes/not content with Trump is when I ‘ll see an op-ed piece in the New York Times attacking Trump.

    Not a fucking second sooner.

    These figures, Kunstler, Osnos, Rozemberg are just marginal jews.

    They count for nothing.

    • Could be a regional or business conflict there though. They are both headquartered in NYC. The Times might be hesitant to shit on a billionaire native son that does big business in their back yard. Smart management would tread lightly because of that.
      I’d look to WaPo and HuffPo instead.

      • If Trump were to really step on jewish toes, it wouldnt matter one bit.

        It would only take one article to make mincemeat of him.

        • Bad time in the newspaper industry to make an enemy of the billionaire next door. I stand by what I said. There are plenty other leftist outlets to gauge the hatred by. And if he seems proIsrael enough, the big Jews may never attack him.
          A better litmus test is if he starts sounding like Ron Paul on the Fed.
          Then you’d see the knives come out. They will fight tooth and nail to keep sunshine off their dealings there. A five minute detailed look at the Fed books gives up the whole crooked game.

          • I think Trump’s fortune is overrated. The jews have many many more billionaires and banks and corporations to do their bidding, they certainly dont need Trump to do that.

            You first version (wapo and huffpo op-eds) may very well be right, but you can be damn sure that NYT will faithfully echo those opinions… if it comes to that.

            I dont think Ron Paul was a real enemy of the jews, nor did I see a real attack on him. I think they were perfectly aware that Ron Paul, at least in his 2012 campaign, was just a shill for Romney.

          • I think Trump’s fortune is overrated. The jews have many many more billionaires and banks and corporations to do their bidding, they certainly dont need Trump to do that.

            You first version (wapo and huffpo op-eds) may very well be right, but you can be damn sure that NYT will faithfully echo those opinions… if it comes to that.

            I dont think Ron Paul was a real enemy of the jews, nor did I see a real attack on him. I think they were perfectly aware that Ron Paul, at least in his 2012 campaign, was just a shill for Romney.

          • Look up how the media absolutely deleted him from that last campaign. Just disappeared him with blackouts even when he’d do 2nd or 3rd in polls or primaries. That’s some serious jewing.
            And anyone that is hardcore antiFed is antiJewish power whether they know it or not.
            The Fed is the biggest ongoing heist of human history. In my eyes, it’s Jew central more than Israel.

          • “In my eyes, it’s Jew central more than Israel.”

            Jewish banking is just one facet of jew power. jewish media and the jewish porn industry are also big players.

            In my eyes The US as awhole is Jew central more than israel, with a totally brainfucked zombie consumer-idiot money-worshipping attitude.

            “Just disappeared him with blackouts even when he’d do 2nd or 3rd in polls or primaries. That’s some serious jewing.”

            Well, not riporting and attacking are 2 different things. And ron Paul himself was just a miserable flunky, a wingman for Romney.

            The jews didnt have to jew him, he did it all by himself.

            I sense libertardian influence in your thinking. Snap out of it.

            National Socialism is the answer. The togetherness of the Folk.

            FOLKSTOGETHERNESS.

            anarchist individualism is to be thrown out of the window.

          • Take away the bank, take away the corrupt money power, and you begin to disarm the enemy.
            In fact, you could take away everything else, media, even Israel itself, and you’d be left with the same Jewish problem that existed before WWII.
            There’s the infamous quote about… so long as I control the nation’s money I care not who writes the laws.
            There’s a reason one of, if not the most, pivotal things Hitler did, was to disarm international (Jewish) banking power within Germany.
            Because, without that step, you’re nowhere.
            It is a facet, as you said. But that is like describing a foundation as a facet of a house. It’s technically accurate, but doesn’t properly describe its significance in the equation.
            Money equals power. Controlling that money equals even more power.
            No amount of togetherness overcomes that, unless destroying that influence is one of the core principles. You will always be a debt slave to the Jew without addressing it first and foremost.

          • “Take away the bank, take away the corrupt money power, and you begin to disarm the enemy.”

            Andrew Johnson did that. He “killed the bank”. But the jew money power was never concentrated in one bank. The jews already caused a panic in 1837, one year after the bank was closed.

            “Ending the fed” (what RP avocated) in itself would solve absolutely nothing. Its just another distraction for the gullible and the feeble-minded. the Us is full with jew banks in any case: Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan chase, etc etc they can create money whenever they want. ending the fed would NOT break the jewish money-power. Maybe it would diminish it to some extent and apparently its enough for the ‘patriots’ to be fooled.

            “so long as I control the nation’s money I care not who writes the laws.”

            You can effectively control a nation’s money without a central bank, although a Central Bank makes things easier. Question of mere detail.

            “There’s a reason one of, if not the most, pivotal things Hitler did, was to disarm international (Jewish) banking power within Germany.”

            He did that alright. But his approach was much more thorough and methodical than Ron Paul’s. In fact, he nationalized the central bank, he didnt end it. Big difference. With the help of a nationalized central bank, He could enforce his rules in banking and economy.

            The main issues are 1) who controls the money supply and 2) money needs to be backed by work instead of debt. Ron Paul’s ‘solution’ included neither of these. That is why he was a shill.

          • I don’t envision anyone shuttering the Fed and Not nationalizing. What would be the point or alternative, yet another super secret traitorous private bank?

            Ron Paul as shill(?ok) is many times more than anyone else has railed against the Fed in recent history. It’s not like it’s a sexy issue that Americans remotely care about or even understand. They disclosed the books (for the first time in 100 years) for just that 3 month TARP giveathon, which was beautifully corrupt…and no one did shit.
            He could have gone his whole career without touching it, everyone else does.
            There’s a trend here to shit on potential allies out of need for some unrealistic purity test. Most people are likely never to get on board with the whole Jew issue. It’s big, complex, intricate history involved, and a lot of it involves boring finance manipulation.
            All the things Americans are just dying to see on TMZ. And every bit of it goes against their goodbot indoctrination.

            Paul attacked the jew Fed (despite no support or traction). I’ll take what allies I can get.

            Oh, and ending the Fed would solve nothing? come on. There’s a reason they wanted it, control it totally, and maintain absolute secrecy. It’s a linchpin in their whole global scam.
            Through it they can bleed us, impoverish us, and channel first use of all money to their friends. Most kings never had that much power.

          • “I don’t envision anyone shuttering the Fed and Not nationalizing.”

            You’re right but that is exactly what Ron Paul wanted. “End the Fed”, remember?

            Anyways, about Ron “The Producer” Paul:

            http://www.cwporter.com/ronpaulnote.htm

            Read it very carefully.

            I agree on principle that there is indeed a tendency to be doctrinaire in the movement. However, when people explicitly say something that is oposite to pro-white intersets, we have to step in. for eccmple, ron paul wanted to legalize all drugs, bc “everybody should have to be free to do anything”. how fucking stupid that?

            “Most people are likely never to get on board with the whole Jew issue.
            It’s big, complex, intricate history involved, and a lot of it involves
            boring finance manipulation.”

            Oh its very very simple, believe me.

            The jews felt a little bit uneasy with Paul, but since Pul never offered any woking solutions, they weren’t really threatened.

            Jews control the biggest US banks, probably always have controlled them. It wont make a practical difference. The jews already controled Us banking between 1867-1913 by reducing the amount of greenbacks Lincoln put into circulation. And there wasnt any FED back then…

            Again and again, i feel libertard influences in your writing. Read the article I linked about Ron Paul above. It deals with libertarianism too.

          • The link you provided made some decent arguments, but also rambles on in a semiloony toons fashion. Needs some formatting and a cohesive editing.

            Some points are positively retarded. Pot is more dangerous than alcohol? Someone needs to spend more time around some alcoholics then.
            And prohibition, on any substance, is a historically proven failure that breeds worse, more violent, and organized crime. Always has, always will.
            Freely available booze, opium, and cocaine wasn’t a significant problem in an almost entirely white America. The problem, as with guns, is with the users and the society they construct.
            And once you allow the government a taste of the totalitarian, you end up with ever growing ATF, DEA, DHS, NSA, etc etc etc invading your privacy and home. And for what? “Keeping the kids off drugs” sorry, not a good enough reason to put me in a police state any more than “terrorism”.

            Like most things, some aspects of libertarian thought are good, some unattainable or outright stupid, especially if you want to preserve a global minority like Europeans.

            Is Paul a fraud, possible. Would any lifelong politician surprise me by being one, nope. Maybe he just thought the campaign was a loss already and called it a day. Kind of like his son should already be doing. Not like both of them couldn’t have been making a stand in Congress instead. I’d have to look it up, but I don’t remember either doing so much as a filibuster attempt against funding for these issues they purport to be against.

            If you sense “libertard” influences, then probably. Freedom, within a racially homogeneous white and somewhat isolationist country, is certainly better than having a dictator or king deciding what I can do and think. Sooner or later someone is going to abuse the hell out of you with that kind of power. (Everyone here likes to fantasize about a Hitler figure, but we’ll never know what a post victorious Hitler Germany would have been. A lot of the movements success was tied up in his charisma and passion.
            What happens when someone takes that throne with impure intent. Then we’re back to prima nocta or a slightly nicer Stalin.
            Totalitarianism doesn’t work any better than libertarianism, and it is the inevitable sliding course of any strong central government. As we’re seeing in our “republic” now.)

            Does that mean some things I don’t like are going to be said and done and legal, yeah. But if you restrict voting rights to those with skin in the game and a little wisdom (as the founders laid out), then you’ll probably be ok. In that, I’d depart radically from full on libertarians as I think universal suffrage is the second worst mistake the U.S. Ever made. Top slot going to either the Fed or war with the South. Kind of a toss up there as to which damned us the most.

            Enjoyable discussing it with you though as you’ve obviously contemplated it a good bit.

            Myself, I’m for whatever keeps my people from going extinct. Simple as that. Honestly, I don’t think American whites have the cultural cohesion to make an ethnostate stick. It could have been done in the old South because back then we had a strong, separate and almost homogenous ethnic & cultural identity. The North and West never really formed that outside of small enclaves based on European or religious roots. What are whites going to rally around? A vague concept like “freedom” doesn’t work and doesn’t define or inspire a strategy to protect it.
            Religion could work. Outside of the South, Mormons accomplished the closest thing to a NorthWest Front ideal until the North/Feds finally caught up to them.

            Probably the only thing that could forge whites together based on whiteness would be adversity like an actual full blown war, civil or invasion. And even then it’s doubtful as at least half of us are brainwashed, rootless, and neutered.

            Most of this philosophizing is for what happens, how we live, after preservation is obtained.
            In the meantime, it may well require a Caesar or Hitler to attain. That doesn’t mean I’d want to re establish hereditary monarchy or something similar. Then you’re back to almost the same neofeudalism the Jews are already trapping us into.

            Our founders were brilliant men. More wise than I’ll ever be, and they came up with this system as the best compromise between freedom and organization. We deviated from their wisdom and paid the price. Of course they never could have foreseen the world we’re dealing with, the possibility for millions to migrate in short spans in a globalized world, trillions in debt, totally deballed Congress, the brainwashing potential of modern media, the gullibility and willful ignorance of our populace, or that white men would lay down so completely before Jew bankers and a dim witted slave race without a fight… Else they probably would have made a few more strident stipulations in the Constitution.

            This ended up way longer than intended or likely desired. Sorry about that. Like your link, could use some editing and less rambling. 😉

          • “Is Paul a fraud, possible.”

            Good we could establish this. And no, at all politicians should be like that. Mabe in america, its inevitableto be like that, but ther are other countries and systems too, around the world.

            “Sooner or later someone is going to abuse the hell out of you with that kind of power.”

            Power corrupts and absolue power corrupts absolutely? Same goes for corporate power (oligopolies) and banking power (Not just the FED, but other huge banking houses too). So the problem with this saying is that it doesnt really mean anything. This saying is used to attack political power and corrupt politicians, but once what I said is revealed, it looses its edge, you see.

            I think what is important is the mindset. And to name one mindset I especially like, the German mindset is the thing. Once you really understand the German language, it will set your thinking straight, especially if you are from the Anglosphere.

            But German language or no German language, most of European countries have ben able to function as Nation-States. That is the thing i hold up as example, and not the classical liberalism of the founding fathers. The constitution and the amendments etc are useless legal abstractions to me. Liberty and freedumb, this rights, that rights. What use of a “right” is if you cant enforce it? Maybe the South had the rights to secede in 1861, but it couldnt enforce it. (Im not taking sides here, North or South, just mentioning.)

            “And prohibition, on any substance, is a historically proven failure that
            breeds worse, more violent, and organized crime. Always has, always
            will.”

            Well the Swedes and Norwegians suceeded in efectively banning heavy beverages, the only alcohol you can get is beer, and that is expensive as hell. So it works, if its smart. Idiot Ron Paul wanting to legalize everything is stupidity of the highest possible order.

            The differences you mentioned between you and the avg. libertard viewpoint are differences of mere detail. You are prety much a libertarian or at least a classical liberal thinker. Now.

            Libertarianism is at its core the hubris of the upset child who wants everything to himself and nothing to others. Extreme individualist anarchism, that is. Classical liberalism and “free market” economy is ultimately the same.

            I saw a documentary about the (in)famous Silk Road and its operator,
            Dread Pirate Roberts. Seeing the guy made me realize something very
            important: classical liberalism and libertarianism are for
            children.

            This is evidenced by you freely changing topics wherever you feel I sunk one of your arguments. Not that its your fault, since I tend to win my debates like almost every time, just saying: you dont really have the rigor to “be perfect” when it comes to arguments. And that is OK of course, we are all different people. The bright side of it is that you are open-minded, not prejudicial (like me) or less prejudicial, etc etc. You are more innocent than me.

            You certainly made me thinking, and i like it. We’ll see if you can
            overcome your cognitive dissonance at some places, reading my stuff.
            🙂
            anyhow, some articles on libertarianism you might find interesting:

            http://www.dailystormer.com/jew-libertarianism-exposes-its-empty-core/

            http://www.dailystormer.com/bitcoin-libertarian-idea-of-paradise-would-be-hell-on-earth/

            http://www.dailystormer.com/libertarianism-is-a-false-flag/

          • If there’s seeming cognitive dissonance, it’s because you’re picking up on the debate inside my own head. (Measuring the merits on both sides, not an attempt to migrate topics to evade any perceived win or loss. Plus, some of that is likely ADD related.)

            Such as, I see the value in a Hitler, for a time, but I don’t want that level of power enshrined in a throne for eternity.
            That’s not selfishness, that’s enlightenment and self preservation.
            Thrones never, ever end well. It will leave your wife or children raped or killed on a king’s whim, just a matter of time and human nature. Even the Bible makes that point.
            The absolute power thing certainly is a cliche, but for a reason.

            Regionalized government, though also imperfect, is the best compromise. (Even that is breaking down with mini nation numbers and diversity within the States). In a place with the geographic and cultural spread of the U.S., the only answer as no king (or any other form of central power) could adequately represent everyone. Same fatal flaw goes for the global aims of Commies.

            I mean, Hitler was initially ruling a country the size of what, Texas? So yeah, a one size fits all solution is a bit more workable in that instance.

            And yes, you’re probably right that I’d fall into a classical liberal philosophy (but with the racial common sense of the era that is often left out of that categorization now). If that puts me in the company of Washington, Jefferson, and Robert E. Lee, I’ll take it as the highest of compliments. (All of which would have had the height of cultural and racial awareness, then or now. But in their wiser time wouldn’t have dreamed it necessary to elaborate upon, explain, or convince their own kind of their merits and unique accomplishments worthy of preservation.)

          • Two questions, one serious and one fun.

            What does the day after a victorious Hitler dies look like?
            As much as I admire him, he was a megalomaniac that probably would have stayed in power until his death. You have to be to have that level of vision and determination. Would his successor have used that massive state and military power positively or oppressively?
            Elections or appointments?
            At best you’d probably have ended up with single party totalitarianism on par with the Soviets, but a bit more beneficial to the people overall. And the upside of a strong, protected Europe.
            But either way, the bloodletting of WWII probably set the course for Europe’s eventual downfall.
            Who knows though with Jews and the banks removed from the equation.
            It’s like wondering whether the U.S. Would be in this state had the South won or George Wallace became President.

            Second, what do you think Napoleons reaction would be to a time traveller informing him that his exploits would leave the flower of France rotting across Europe, enable Germany to eventually kick the hell out of his people, and allow Rothschild’s Jews to take over the planet. That would be a priceless expression to behold.

          • What matters above all, is the mindset.

            In the German mindset, an inferior military officer can freely speak his mind and his doubts to his superior, but he has to obey them, ultimately. Honesty coupled with obedience. If he can sway his superior, good. If he cant, well thats it.

            The Prussians for example placed emphasis on these:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_virtues

            Which of these virtues was ever emphasized in american education? We can agree that far far less than in Prussia.

            Liberalism: Liberalism is the gradual extension of rights to everyone. first, white males had the vote. then women had th vote. then blacks and all the other garbage had the vote.

            similarly , with marriage: first two white heteros of the oposite sex had the right to marry. then 2 heteros of the opposite sex of any race had the right to marry. Then two homos got the right to marry. My suspicion is that people with animals too can marry in the future, why not…

            Liberalism is about “rights”. Fuck rights. What matters is faith, folk and family.

            Rights are useless abstractions many times removed from reality.

            Also, appealing to “rights” implies hubris and haughtiness almost every time: “I have the right to do this, i have the right to do that…” etc. It also leads to talmudic hairsplitting, because some other party involved may not agree with you about your right, then you take out the law books and begin interpreting shit for day no end.

            Same went down with the abortion debates. Abortion is bad bc you kill your baby. well, its not baby, its a fetus. is it or isnt. Is the baby-fetus a living being? It has its heartbeat in 6 weeks. Or is is human being when it has the first brainwaves? these are just the few sketches. should abortion be a parent’s decison, or should it be the court’s decision?

            (i am very strongly anti-abortion, just illustrating, how useless this shit is)

            You can debate each and every single one of these technicalities till kingdom come, without ever achieving anything.
            Liberalism = legalism = talmudic hairsplitting. One rabbi said this, the other rabbi said that. the talmud is full of these interptetations.

            Faith, folk, family. In a decent system, the state IS the folk. the State is the togetherness of the people living in that state. The state is US.
            There should peferably also be a state church, and very strong incentives towards having big families. That is only what matters.

            This is a strongly European perspective of course, but it has cohesion. It is organic. And it works.

            The Anglo-Saxon classical liberal model cannot ever generate a nation-state. It is designed to keep people occupied with legal fiction. that is partly why America is NOT a nation. Even the nation-like regions like the South have a very vestigial identity, which is mostly (not entirely) negative. The Southern negative identity (“what we stand against”) can be summed up as “Fucking Yanks.” That is what shows and that is what I see. The positive identity (“what we stand for”) is much rarely seen.

            Anyway, the Us solution would be strong regionalized nation-states, with the system I described. Whether it is a democracy or dictatorship, is of secondary importance.

            Washington, Jefferson, Robert E. Lee: they lived in a bad system some of which they themselves helped to create. How can you be a pure person in a filthy system? BTW when it comes to founding fathers, I hold up Benjamin Franklin as an example:

            No man ought to own more property than needed for his livelihood; the rest, by right, belonged to the state. – See more at:
            http://www.quote-wise.com/quotes/benjamin-franklin/no-man-ought-to-own-more-property-than-needed#sthash.4A7exYhB.dpufhttp://www.quote-wise.com/quotes/benjamin-franklin/no-man-ought-to-own-more-property-than-needed

            I dont know what exactly constitues a “property needed for livelihood” (maybe a house and a car and some other minor stuff) but this quote has the right attitude.

            Now, answering your question: I think a power struggle would have developed after Hitler died. But i dont view that as a necessarily bad thing. sometimes things have to be fought out. There certainly wouldnt have been a civil war or anything like that.

            Napoleon: All statesmen are beholden to their times. Napoleon had actual problems to deal with at any point of his reign. He mostly reacted to outside events. Even the most powerful statesmen do. He prob would have done what he did anyways.

            “It’s like wondering whether the U.S. Would be in this state had the South won”

            If the South had won, there would have been two states staring at each other armed to he teeth, ready for another war anytime. And dont forget judah p benjamin and the jews’ role in slavery, which is an abominable institution.

            George Wallace turned out to be a miserable wuss when groveled and apologized for his “racist remarks”. LBJ was from the South, Carter was from the South, all turned out to be turncoats or failures.

            The brainwashed zio-evangelicals and southerners serving as cannon fodder to die or be crippled in some fucking desert dont help the southern cause either.

            I see you are from the South. Here is something you might find interesting:

            http://history.stackexchange.com/questions/553/why-did-the-southern-states-secede-from-the-u-s

            It shows that the southerners lived in perpetual fear that there would be another slave revolt. That is not a healthy atmosphere to live in. A foreign racial element always breeds hostility on the long run.

            The South is in a very very deep bind. In order to achieve independence, you would have to begin nation-bulding almost from ground zero. Forget the historical baggage, it only holds you back. Start anew.

  35. I’ve seen a little here and there about Richard Spencer. Is he like Jared Taylor in that he never mentions the word “jew”?

    • Apparently I identified the wrong bloke and am officially an idiot:(

      • That’s the wrong Spencer. lol.

        • Sorry who was I thinking of?

          • Robert Spencer. I mix ’em up myself.

          • I think sometimes they actually mix themselves up.

            At least Robert’s narrative is internally consistent, making sense on that level.

            I honestly have no idea what Richard is talking about the vast majority of the time.

            It is because I’m just too stupid?

            Go read the full article, and see if you can figure out what it is meant to be communicating. Report back.

          • Not directed at me, but I just read it and am not sure I get it either. I think he means to be ironic about the GOP. This is not without reason: In his piece today “Mechanisms for Conservatives”, Kevin MacDonald cites a recent poll of 100 House Republican “conservatives” that found that only 1 favored decreases in legal immigration.

            To return to what might be Kuntsler’s somewhat legit criticism of Trump, namely the part about gambling, Trump is a finance blowhard, not an old-style captain of industry.

          • Robert Spencer. He works with the the jewish anti-jihadists.

          • Yes, Robert Spencer’s a strange guy. He does excellent work exposing the Koran and Hadiths, but I don’ think he’s crazy about Kikes either, except that they pay his bills. I think it’s that he just knows what side of his bread is buttered. I stopped reading him years and years ago, though, so I don’t know where he stands these days vis-a-vis Kikes.

          • That’s a cartoonish post obviously written by a Jewish ethnic activist.

      • No big deal, I remember that he has spoken at an amren conference before.

    • Not “doesn’t mention”, but actually praises and makes excuses for and admires Kikes, and attacks and ridicules as “paranoid monomaniacs” anyone who states facts about kike control of the media, etc.

      • Thanks. May he become more irrelevant than he already is. I am relatively new to WN. I am now remembering the point in which I discovered WN on the web. It was around the time when there was a conference in Hungary, and Richard Spencer was a big part of that fiasco. Anyway, besides being a joke, he will remain irrelevant to me.

  36. Spencer needs to be sunk. He is hurting us more every day.

    • Forget who he is, and never speak his name as one of us again.

      • This is a life-or-death battle for people like us. It seems to be a fame-and-fortune game for so-called WNs like Spencer.

        • Then why am I so much more famous than him?

          Though the fortune thing… maybe.

          I guess I would rather believe he just doesn’t really get it, and has some sort of brain-state where he believes he is the smartest person on earth.

          • You’re more famous because you are right and you work very hard and people trust you. Fame doesn’t exclude those who don’t seek it for its own sake. But I’m not saying anything that you don’t already know.

            Yeah, maybe his heart hasn’t necessarily wandered, but I don’t know that, and he seems awfully willing to do foolish things.

          • I think Ulfric has it right. Spencer seems to be a narcissistic attention whore, and above all, a snob. Perhaps he chose the Right instead of the Left because he thinks the talent pool is shallower and he has a better chance to shine, and can get in near the ground floor. On the Left, all the good spots are taken.
            Perhaps he can be, or has been, “influenced,” by someone who has shown benevolent concern for his financial future.

          • I think Ulfric has it right. Spencer seems to be a narcissistic attention whore, and above all, a snob. Perhaps he chose the Right instead of the Left because he thinks the talent pool is shallower and he has a better chance to shine, and can get in near the ground floor. On the Left, all the good spots are taken.
            Perhaps he can be, or has been, “influenced,” by someone who has shown benevolent concern for his financial future.

          • really hope you had a look at the Dommergue interview and the alexithymia study… .

        • Forget his name and never associate him with any of us. Exile is what people like that deserve. In the old days exiling a person was the best way to get rid of him when his crimes were not worth killing him for.

        • Agreed.

          You have to understand what the “New right” is in White nationalist circles and why they would see Trump in the same way Cuntstler does. They do not want the same things many of us want. We want a populist movement. They don’t.

          They are basically leftist elitist snobs who hate middle class people – especially Christian middle class people and they loathe and despise the idea of populism. I could elaborate further but there is no point. That sums it up and everything they write and say flows from it.

          One last thing – they are also VERY pro faggot.

        • Richard Spencer is a fellow-traveller. No more, no less.

          ETA Actually I think I get where Richard Spencer is coming from, not on this article but in general. I went and read a few articles at Radix. From what it looks like, he’s a huge Sam Francis fan (not that there’s anything wrong with that) and he’s a philosophically-inclined person. Well, that tells you a lot right there. Philosophers are a different breed of people. Anyone who doesn’t spend their leisure time poring over Heidegger or Hegel or Husserl and actually consider it to be fun is not going to be too impressed with Spencer’s writing, I can tell you that much. I’m guessing what Spencer is trying to do is give us his vision of what the future of our race might look like after the revolution. I think that’s where his focus lies. He seems more focused on where we’ll be a hundred years from now, a thousand years from now, whereas myself and many of us here are focused on what’s happening today and next week. I think there’s something to be said for both viewpoints. Our Folk needs both and both serve a useful role.

          Or I could be totally wrong. I just found Radix last month. The only reason I even know who he is is because his name started showing up in several jewspapers when the cuckservative thing blew up a month or so ago, so he’s not all that famous.

          But maybe he is just in it for fame and recognition or he’s trying to do a Gavin McInnes by repudiating people like us so people won’t call him an evil Nazi.

        • Alt-kikes like Spencer Johnson and Sunic actually think they can one day get academic jobs or hired as think-tank pundits.

  37. “Implies he isn’t really that good at building buildings.”

    I’d like to see Kunstler do better.

  38. Hymie Cuntler needs a diaper and some new labor-camp pajamas.
    The armbands are coming and he knows it:

  39. Is Spencer weak??

  40. Jews, it’s too late for you to try to mend your relations with us now. I don’t give a squat shit if a million Jews decide to get Swastika tattoos and start singing the Horst Wessel song. You’ve already heaped so much destruction upon our race that we will never forgive you. You wrote a check your ass couldn’t cash and now you’re locked in till the bitter end. You made a conscious choice to try and destroy our Folk.

    So now we’re all going to ride this thing out until one of us is dead, or both. There’s no going back. We’ve crossed the Rubicon. The die is cast.

  41. Jesus Christ, just seeing all the liberal tears flow if Trump is the next president is worth the price of admission.

    • Certainly, mate.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOLNwrFX4mc

      Here is The Donald, embracing Netanyahu. With hebrew subs, if that is your thing.

      • It is a process. Trump pretends to advocate for whites and white interests then stabs us in the back for the sake of the Jews, then what comes next?? Do you know of the Jew stab in the back of the German people and what that begot?? Israel AND Hitler.

        • What’s your opinion about Putin?

        • “Trump pretends to advocate for whites and white interests then stabs us
          in the back for the sake of the Jews, then what comes next?”

          US whites have been continuously being stabbed in the back for at least a hundred years. Your backs are so full of holes you dont even notice it anymore.So, to answer your question: you wont even notice it as a betrayal.

          • Is that your hope?? Do you hear foot steps??

          • I stated facts. Since 1913, there has been no national sovereignty in the US.

            Trump wanted to bomb Iran in 2007. In the vid Nicholas linked Trump says that he can be so tough you wouldnt believe etc when it comes to Iran. Watch the vid.

            Trump wants to raise (!!) the military budget. The Usa military budget is already larger than the 19 countries following it (2.-20. in the ranking) combined. I trust your ability to understand what the above sentence means.

          • I have my doubts too. But like I said it is a process. If he betrays whites it is only going to further radicalize the white electorate.

          • american whites have been betrayed so many times by their politicians that you lost count.

            With jews in the background, the only ‘process’ is being mindfucked again and again. Rather than ‘radicalization’, people will break down from inside.

            Trump is being honest about his intentions regrding going to war. He wont betray anybody, when he will lunch WW3. The last person the world needs is a fucking neocon lunatic at the steering wheel.

          • How many people do you see reading a newspaper?? Do you realize that Jew owned news media is no longer being consumed and their ratings and viewership is in a steep decline?? Why??

          • Newspapers now have internet editions, duh… and instead newsmedia, people consume gossipmedia and celebmedia, what happened to miley cyrus and katy perry an other pieces of shit.

            People are never short of distractions, especially in the jewnited states.

          • So everybody is a stupid goyim, right?? Is that what you are selling?? It only takes ten percent of the people to affect change. More than ten percent of white Christian America is now Jew aware and the numbers are only going to grow.

          • Breaking news : the masses always have been gullible.

            “It only takes ten percent of the people to affect change.”

            Well, according to the Pareto Principle, it takes twenty percent.

            I Isked a fella from Texas the other day, and he estimated 5% to be jew-aware. That is along way to go, bro.

          • Okay Karl Marx. Can you go bother some one else. I am tired of your snide pestering. I know what you are and I know what your doing. You need not convince me of anything. What you need to do is obey and follow Gods laws and treat other people in the way you would like to be treated. Is it in you?? I don’t think so.

          • Okay idiot, I imagine the look on your face when prez Trump will shove down another war on your gullible throat. Im prety sure you wil find some bulshit excuse why this was necessary “to make america great again” lol.

            There is no fool like the old fool.

          • So your not Jewish?? Then why do my thoughts and opinions mean so much to you?? And why must you challenge and refute every word I say?? Why ?? Why ?? A thousand times WHY??

          • Because you are spouting bullshit?…

          • All you keep saying is people are stupid, people are gullible, people don’t know anything. Then I agree partially with you but it is not good enough You continue on and on like a broken record, for what?? To antagonise and annoy the stupid goyim?? Now you want to continue pestering me and for what?? WTF is wrong with you??

          • You partially agreed with me? When?

          • Fee-fi-fo-fum

            Wie der Wind

            3 days ago

            I have my doubts too. But like I said it is a process. If he betrays
            whites it is only going to further radicalize the white electorate.

          • How is another war in the Middle East going to radiacalize the White electorate?

            Americans dont give a fuck about a Middle East war. The rest of the world does, though.

          • You can’t see how tired America is of the Jews and Israel. I can’t make a blind person see.

          • If you are so tired if jews and israel, why are you supporting Trump? He is the biggest cocksucker to jews since ages.

          • Trump wants to “double and triple up the sanctions under ANY circumstances” on Iran. That is economic warfare right there.

            “Its a terrible deal for us, its a terrible deal for israel, its a deal THAT SHOULDN’T HAPPEN”

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsE3Imdfi8E

            Your analyst seem to have missed this interview. Or he is just a paid shill.

            You are right however, one cant make the blind see, or more precisely, the deaf hear. For that, you would have to understand fucking English.

      • We’ll take the immigration issues first when Trump is elected. Then work on his philo-ZioOrc afterwards. One step at a time to dejudify this nation.

      • Great post, people love being led but hate finding out where to LOL
        Always was a Zionist imho, the love for money has to be the biggest give away, but ….”we can mould him to what we want”….No you can’t, he is spiritually dead!

        • Trump on the NeoCohen Iraq war 7 years ago.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqA2Hs5dTFM

          Yeah, the Jews love Trump. I can tell you have a trained and diligent eye on the campaign Nicholas…

          If I want news and educated opinion on the ongoing American presidential race, I’ll be sure to visit Nicholas1russiaisbest.com…I’m sure to get a handle on the situation on the ground… and not some Russian yahoo cheerleading for Putin.
          ————————————————————————–
          Donald Trump gets no love from the Koch brothers
          http://www.cbsnews.com/news/election-2016-donald-trump-gets-no-love-from-the-koch-brothers/

          As Donald Trump seeks to build on his momentum in the Republican
          primary, turning the evident voter enthusiasm surrounding his candidacy
          into the concrete infrastructure of a viable campaign, he’ll have to do
          so without help from two of the GOP’s biggest benefactors.

          Industrialists
          Charles and David Koch, who have used their multibillion-dollar
          business empire to build a network of conservative advocacy groups, have
          decided that Trump will not be able to access their extensive database
          on voter information, nor will he be invited to participate in their
          conservative cattle-calls, CBS News’ Julianna Goldman confirms.
          —————————————————————————-
          Keep ‘researching’ and staying on top of things “Nicholas”!

          Your political analysis is invaluable…

        • biggest problem with Trump besides his israeli subservience is his promotion of a bigger military budget. This is, well, counterproductive. He infuses into whites the notion that the USA needed a bigger military now. Which is simply absurd.

        • biggest problem with Trump besides his israeli subservience is his promotion of a bigger military budget. This is, well, counterproductive. He infuses into whites the notion that the USA needed a bigger military now. Which is simply absurd.

        • Trump is 100% correct about Iran: If the crazy mullahs in Iran have a nuke, they will target Israel, Saudi Arabia and Europe too. Trump is a hero.

          • Insane neocon talk, yours. Trump is a fucking warmonger, nothing else.

            the crazy mulahs stated several times that they dont wnt to ataxk anyone. And its not Iran that has attacked at last 60 countries since 1950.

            It is the jewnited states of america.

      • He’s the lesser of 16+ evils, man. Sure he does the whole “I stand with Israel” bullshit, but you think we’ll ever get a candidate that doesn’t do that? I think it’s smart to keep Israel around so we can dump our Jews there instead of going through the hassle of rounding them up & gassing them.

        • Ok, here is the deal. Nobody expected and nobody forced the Donald to embrace the mass murderer Netanyahu in 2013. He did it out of his own fucking will.

          Trump wanted to bomb iran in 2007, so the lesser of many evils might just bring World War fucking Three upon us. I knew a guy who was on similarly friendly terms with Netanyahu, and he wanted to bomb Iran too. Does the name Mitt Romney ring any bells?

          Nobody ever gassed jews mate, I dont know where you are getting that bullshit from.

          • WWIII might be the best thing that could happen for us politically. If it pops off brown immigration will be stopped in a second & during times of war people shift to the right. If we gotta drop nukes on Iran or vise versa to wake up the white man so be it.

          • There were many fucking wars america instigated throughout the world, the last thing we need is another one.

            the migrants that are flooding Europe are flooding it thanks to the disastrous jew-led us middle-east policy. I dont know where you live and what info you are getting, but its high time you realize that the fucking migrants are coming precisely because of your fucking wars in the middle east.

            I’d prefer to avoid a nuclear war, thank you very much. Lets hope that your twisted hope never comes true.

            Reading what you wrote makes clear as day, why america is fucked beyond redemption.

            Summing up:
            Trump is just another warmonger whore for israel, who is hell-bent on doing the neocons’ bidding for them.

            I agree that america needs to go. But leave the rest of the world out of it.

    • Better yet all the mexispics raising hell. Fuck mexicans, theyre scum. And theyre really getting esteemed up and entitled these days. They no longer have thst guilty smile they used to walk around with.

  42. “World leaders considered Hitler a clown in the early going, too, you know.”

    ——————————————————————————————————————

    Actually, they didn’t. They all went after him with everything they had from day one. Jews, of course, were the main instigators of this .

    http://www.holocaust-history.org/questions/DailyExpress-March1933-judeafrontpage.jpg

    • I think it’s amusing that they say that shit about Adolf now. They put him on the cover of their magazines after all.

    • Everything Hitler is shit to our contemporaries, to our enemies. Nat Geo went over his health, they even went as far to mention the composition of his stool.

      And it’s not just Hitler. Another documentary about Rommel’s role said he was a know nothing who got lucky in Africa. I mean, Rommel even went as far to plot and carry out assassination against Hitler…They also had his son on giving validity to muh holocaust.

    • great comment with image!

      Hat’s off to you!

  43. CUNTSler sounds more appropriate for This guy’s name.

Leave a Reply