May 17, 2017
Actual poster above every water cooler at the WaPo head office.
Well, the “melted snow” Syrian Observatory for Human Rights Assad ovening story doesn’t appear to have gone anywhere today.
I thought it would have exploded.
Instead, we’re talking about Trump transferring secret Israeli Jew intelligence to the Russians.
I think they tried to pull the “Syrian mass ovening thing” and then even the Jew journalists were like “wait, the evidence is melted snow? I can’t fap to this.”
President Trump and top White House officials defended his conversations with Russian officials Tuesday, while lashing out at anonymous sources who relayed the sensitive information to reporters.
White House press secretary Sean Spicer described unauthorized leaking of sensitive or classified information as “frankly dangerous” and a threat to national security. The press secretary drew a distinction between leaks and Trump’s conversation with the Russians, saying the discussion with the Russian officials involved shared threats to the U.S. and Russia.
At an earlier briefing, National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster told reporters that “our national security has been put at risk by those violating confidentiality and those releasing information to the press that could … make American citizens and others more vulnerable.”
And here I sit thinking McMaster is the one who leaked the Russian conversation.
How many people would have had access to the contents of the conversation between Trump and Lavrov?
It’s a pretty darn short list.
So he gives a press conference to cover his tracks…
(Timestamped for when he starts talking about the WaPo leaks.)
Not that he’s going to get away with it. If he did it, Trump knows, he just isn’t going to call him out on it because it will make him look incompetent for hiring someone who’s trying to manipulate him into a war with Russia against his will.
The White House’s new tack came the day after the Washington Post reported that Trump disclosed to Russian officials the foreign city where an ISIS plot was hatched – a development that could potentially lead the Russians to discover U.S. intelligence sources and methods.
The Post report relied on anonymous current and former U.S. officials in its account of the small May 10 Oval Office meeting Trump had with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and ambassador Sergey Kislyak. An excerpt from an official transcript of the meeting reveals that Trump told them, “I get great intel. I have people brief me on great intel every day.”
Come on now.
Either WaPo made it up – as is the case about half of the time, but doesn’t appear to be the case this time, as Trump basically confirmed it on Twitter – or someone on Trump’s team leaked it. This wasn’t some Obama holdover leak. Something that sensitive wasn’t just getting passed around.
As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining….
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 16, 2017
…to terrorism and airline flight safety. Humanitarian reasons, plus I want Russia to greatly step up their fight against ISIS & terrorism.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 16, 2017
I have been asking Director Comey & others, from the beginning of my administration, to find the LEAKERS in the intelligence community…..
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 16, 2017
Why is the Daily Stormer the only outlet suggesting that McMaster – or one of his neocon underlings who he is responsible for – is the obvious #1 suspect?
The #2 suspect, of course, is Trump himself. There are several different ways this could be bait.
Trump spoke briefly about the controversy Tuesday in between meetings with visiting Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. He said he had a “very, very successful meeting” with the Russian foreign minister earlier this month, and the U.S. wants to get as much help as possible in the fight against terrorism.
“We’re going to have a lot of great success over the next coming years,” Trump said.
As president, Trump has the ability to disclose classified information largely as he chooses. Yet his decision to discuss an ally’s information on the Islamic State with other countries could damage his standing with world leaders and lead some countries to start second-guessing their own intelligence-sharing agreements with the U.S.
Why, Israel of course.
Israel withholds all kinds of intelligence from us. In January, the Jews actually had a “top secret” meeting with US intelligence agencies ordering them to hide their own intelligence from Donald Trump – allegedly fearing that Trump would leak it to Russia and Russia to Iran.
And America, Russia and Israel are the only three countries that are going to have any relevant intelligence about what is going on in the Middle East.
See, this is how the media kikes you. They generally don’t outright lie (except WaPo, which just makes shit up), but instead say things that technically are not false, but which don’t actually have any relevance.
This is why you need the Daily Stormer to point this stuff out to you.
The New York Times reported Tuesday afternoon that the intelligence in question was actually provided by Israel.
Ron Dermer, Israeli ambassador to the United States, said in a statement responding to the report: “Israel has full confidence in our intelligence-sharing relationship with the United States and looks forward to deepening that relationship in the years ahead under President Trump.”
It probably isn’t even anything particularly relevant, whatever it is.
But Trump giving Russia Israeli intelligence is potentially symbolic.
Perhaps a frog whistle.
Which would support the theory Trump leaked it himself (obviously not personally, to anyone out there who needed that clarified – he would have had a staff member do it).
Also, I’ve been saying for a long time Trump needs to start leaking massive amounts of fake information to the WaPo and NYT, and make it obvious that he’s doing that.
On Capitol Hill, Democrats and Republicans alike expressed concern. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called the reports “deeply disturbing” and said they could affect the willingness of U.S. allies and partners to share intelligence with the U.S.
Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called for Congress to have immediate access to a transcript of Trump’s meeting with the Russians, saying that if Trump refuses, Americans will doubt that their president is capable of safeguarding critical secrets.
Yeah, two Israeli agents are butthurt.
But neither is very smart.
And there could well be something very interesting in the works here.
Because the third option, after McMaster leaking it and Trump leaking it, is that Trump did something on purpose knowing that McMaster would leak it.
Whaddaya think of that?
Cry Kikery and Let Loose the Leaks of Comey
In other Russian kookspiracy news, it appears that the Comey leaks have begun.
President Trump asked the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, to shut down the federal investigation into Mr. Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, in an Oval Office meeting in February, according to a memo Mr. Comey wrote shortly after the meeting.
“I hope you can let this go,” the president told Mr. Comey, according to the memo.
The existence of Mr. Trump’s request is the clearest evidence that the president has tried to directly influence the Justice Department and F.B.I. investigation into links between Mr. Trump’s associates and Russia.
Mr. Comey wrote the memo detailing his conversation with the president immediately after the meeting, which took place the day after Mr. Flynn resigned, according to two people who read the memo. The memo was part of a paper trail Mr. Comey created documenting what he perceived as the president’s improper efforts to influence a continuing investigation. An F.B.I. agent’s contemporaneous notes are widely held up in court as credible evidence of conversations.
Mr. Comey shared the existence of the memo with senior F.B.I. officials and close associates. The New York Times has not viewed a copy of the memo, which is unclassified, but one of Mr. Comey’s associates read parts of the memo to a Times reporter.
“I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Comey, according to the memo. “He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”
Mr. Trump told Mr. Comey that Mr. Flynn had done nothing wrong, according to the memo.
Mr. Comey did not say anything to Mr. Trump about curtailing the investigation, only replying: “I agree he is a good guy.”
In a statement, the White House denied the version of events in the memo.
“While the president has repeatedly expressed his view that General Flynn is a decent man who served and protected our country, the president has never asked Mr. Comey or anyone else to end any investigation, including any investigation involving General Flynn,” the statement said.
“The president has the utmost respect for our law enforcement agencies, and all investigations. This is not a truthful or accurate portrayal of the conversation between the president and Mr. Comey.”
Mr. Comey created similar memos — including some that are classified — about every phone call and meeting he had with the president, the two people said. It is unclear whether Mr. Comey told the Justice Department about the conversation or his memos.
Mr. Trump fired Mr. Comey last week. Trump administration officials have provided multiple, conflicting accounts of the reasoning behind Mr. Comey’s dismissal. Mr. Trump said in a television interview that one of the reasons was because he believed “this Russia thing” was a “made-up story.”
IT IS A TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY MADE UP STORY. 100% FAKE NEWS.
Fine, I’m a Russian shill – everyone knows that (not in the sense of working for them, but in the sense of basically supporting everything they do no matter what as I view them as the singular hope for the continuation of white Western civilization).
But I am telling you that although I think it would be awesome if Russia had done Wikileaks and colluded with Donald Trump in some backroom secret conspiracy to unite America and Russia and smash Jewish liberal multiculturalism and degeneracy once and for all, this simply did not happen.
There is no way it happened.
Because if it had, there would be some kind of evidence released.
When it comes down to it, the only actual “evidence” that exists – the thing on which this entire narrative was based – is that CrowdStrike, after having been hired by the DNC, found “traces of malware known to have been used by FSB-linked hackers” on the DNC servers.
THE FBI NEVER INDEPENDENTLY CONFIRMED THIS BECAUSE THE DNC REFUSED TO LET THEM HAVE ACCESS TO THEIR SERVERS.
So then the narrative became “Russia did Wikileaks.”
From there, it was “Russia hacked the election” (they sort of tried to say they were going to hack the voting machines, then admitted that was impossible, but kept using the term “hacked the election” to refer to Wikileaks).
Now it’s “Donald Trump called Vladimir Putin and told him to do Wikileaks.”
The only singular piece of information – which no one has independently verified – is that CrowdStrike says there was Russian-linked malware on the DNC server.
All of the rest of this is just based on Comey, Rogers, Schiff and Clapper claiming that it’s all real. Comey and Rogers both lied under oath.
They claim they have secret evidence, but they won’t even give any sort of vague indication as to what it might be, so the thing just goes on and on and on forever.
WaPo backs them up with “confidential sources” giving non-falsifiable claims, and the entire media just runs with it, reporting it as fact, with people like McCain, Schumer and Graham coming out and saying it’s all fact.
And I’m telling you, I am literally one of the only people on the internet saying this. No one – not even in Infowars/Breitbart circles – is bothering to point out that the seed of this entire thing is a private company hired by the DNC who made claims no one ever independently verified.
This site is more than just jokes.
I hate to SHILL HARD, but this is the reality of the situation here.
Anyway, back to the NYT piece – for the best part of all.
The Feb. 14 meeting took place just a day after Mr. Flynn was forced out of his job after it was revealed he had lied to Vice President Mike Pence about the nature of phone conversations he had had with the Russian ambassador to the United States.
Mr. Comey had been in the Oval Office that day with other senior national security officials for a terrorism threat briefing. When the meeting ended, Mr. Trump told those present — including Mr. Pence and Attorney General Jeff Sessions — to leave the room except for Mr. Comey.
Alone in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump began the discussion by condemning leaks to the news media, saying that Mr. Comey should consider putting reporters in prison for publishing classified information, according to one of Mr. Comey’s associates.
THIS IS WHAT WE WANT!!!!
WE NEED A NEW FBI DIRECTOR WHO IS WILLING TO PUT THESE RATS IN PRISON!!!!!!!!
Mr. Trump then turned the discussion to Mr. Flynn.
After writing up a memo that outlined the meeting, Mr. Comey shared it with senior F.B.I. officials. Mr. Comey and his aides perceived Mr. Trump’s comments as an effort to influence the investigation, but they decided that they would try to keep the conversation secret — even from the F.B.I. agents working on the Russia investigation — so the details of the conversation would not affect the investigation.
More like so they could hold them to leak to the press when Comey got fired.
Mr. Comey was known among his closest advisers to document conversations that he believed would later be called into question, according to two former confidants, who said Mr. Comey was uncomfortable at times with his relationship with Mr. Trump.
The White House has repeatedly crossed lines that other administrations have been reluctant to cross when discussing politically charged criminal investigations. Mr. Trump has disparaged the continuing F.B.I. investigation as a hoax and called for an inquiry into his political rivals. His representatives have taken the unusual step of declaring no need for a special prosecutor to investigate the president’s associates.
As I explained above: it is a hoax.
No administration has ever acted this way because no administration has ever been hoaxed this way. Period.
It is a blatant hoax, on par with the Holocaust.
All the proof you need is that after the Syrian strike, they stopped talking about it for 5 weeks – COMPLETE SILENCE – and now, all the sudden, after the Comey firing and the Lavrov meeting, it is now once again the most important thing that has ever happened ever in the history of human life on planet earth (besides the Holocaust itself).
The way this is playing out has led me to believe that there is no way Trump is not at least trying to get back on the side of the people.
There is simply no way they would be going after him like this if he was the same Trump who bombed Assad then changed all his policies then refused to fight the Democrats on the spending bill.
He is a different person now.
He might not be campaign Trump, but he’s not “the horrah of babies getting sprayed with a water hose” Trump either.
The Comey firing and the subsequent meeting with Lavrov signaled this, and the way they are now brutalizing him confirms it.
I have no idea if he’ll be able to keep this up – he could break tomorrow – but right now, he is fighting for us.
So I’m not swallowing the whole White Pill just yet. But I’m crushing it up and taking a bump with a pen cap.
Editor’s Note: These Trump round-ups are a massive undertaking, but it falls on me to do them, because no one else can or will. Like, it is just basically an objective fact that my analysis of this stuff is better than any being published on the internet that I’m aware of. I have to publish them either way, as a duty, but please let me know in the comments what you think of them. In particular I’m wondering: as they are more serious than the rest of my content, and as they are exclusive, should I take a more serious tone with them moving forward, or do you think this is working?
Less of our people would read them if I took a more serious tone, but also, more of people who are not our people would read them, and that might give the site a little bit of serious credibility (remember when I wrote that “Normie’s Guide to the Alt-Right,” totally straight-faced? This is getting cited by academics now).
Anyway, wanted the people’s thoughts. I’ll make sure to read the comments on this one. -AA