Semi-Famous Former Athlete Creates Outrage for Saying You Need a Man and a Woman to Create Children

Spartacus
Daily Stormer
July 3, 2019

This broad is literally Hitler. Hitlerally.

Being normal is the craziest thing you can do in CURRENT YEAR.

Daily Mail:

Sharron Davies has sparked another gender-based row that has led followers to accuse her of transphobia.

The former Olympic swimmer posted about an end-of-the-world type scenario to explain why she thinks ‘binary sexes matter’.

Ms Davies claimed that the only way for humanity to survive on a deserted island, if reduced to two humans, would be for a man and a woman to procreate.

“Claimed?”

CLAIMED?!?!?!?


This statement is full of hatred

While some agreed with Davies’ analogy, others were quick to take it apart, claiming she had manufactured a scenario to prove her point.

Pandora Sylvana replied: ‘And? I don’t know if you’ve notice but we’re not exactly running short of homosapiens on this planet. This is also one of the standard arguments made by homophobes.’

Another commentor hit back at Davies by saying her argument meant post-menopausal woman would not count as a female in the scenario.

‘Sharron, you’ve 56. You’re not going to be having kids on a desert island either. And yet you’re still a woman. Gosh, it’s almost as if identity isn’t defined by fertility or something.’

An infertile woman is still a woman, just a defective one.

A man who cuts his dick off was never a woman, and will never be a woman.

Steve Foster defended Davies, saying he ‘couldn’t believe you are having to teach basic biology to so many.

‘Its also amazing the fact that they don’t accept it. On behalf of humanity I salute your time, patience and resilience.’

As some accused her of being a TERF (trans-exclusionary radical feminist), Davies tried to explain that the idea of two people stuck on an island was just an analogy for her point.

I like that term TERF, they’re trying to claim that not thinking men become women if they cut their dicks off is some kind of “radical” opinion that only a small minority of people are crazy enough to believe.

“Why can’t the rest of you goyim be as normal as this goy right here?”

The two-time Commonwealth Games gold medallist is one a number of high profile names to give their opinion on the divisive issue.

Earlier this year 18-time tennis Grand Slam tennis singles champion Martina Navratilova had to apologise for comments described as transphobic by one campaign group.

She said that male athletes ‘self identifying’ as female to compete is unfair and even went as far as to say it is ‘cheating’.

The tennis legend, who is gay, is a long-term campaigner for LGBT rights but claimed that male athletes ‘self identifying’ as female to compete is unfair.

She probably just feels bad about not being near the top of the totem pole of oppression anymore.

Also – there is no such thing as “transphobic.”

She was called out by Canadian academic and cycling champion Dr Rachel McKinnon, who is the first transgender woman to win a female world cycling title.

McKinnon, 35, still has her male anatomy, but has lived as a woman since she was 29.

She accused Navratilova of transphobia and demanded an apology.

When I saw the first Jurassic Park movie, when I was around 5 or 6, I lived as a velociraptor for around 3 weeks.


I just realized this is the only anime dinosaur gif I have

But you see – I wasn’t actually a velociraptor, because you need to be a velociraptor in order to be a velociraptor, and I’m not a velociraptor.

It sounds complicated, but it’s actually not.

Following an article on the subject that Navratilova wrote for The Times Athlete Ally, an LGBTQ athlete advocacy group, removed her from their advisory board, stating her comments ‘are transphobic [and] based on a false understanding of science and data.’

Yeah, sorry bud, I’m not gonna spend the rest of my life contorting my brain into thinking that men become women if they cut their dicks off just because some idiot with a degree told me so.

And most of those people, for that matter, aren’t even idiots, they’re just scared of the consequences.

Most people are easily intimidated, and will avoid any kind of conflict if they can. And since universities are already flooded with people who would’ve been interned or even killed in any sane society, it’s not really hard to make them say whatever you want them to say.

The good news though is that we’re really close to a total or partial collapse of civilization, and then it’s only a matter of time until we cleanse the world of things that do not deserve to live on it.

Join the discussion at TGKBBS