November 29, 2018
I don’t think anything really hammers home just how dystopian the situation is more than these forced child tranny stories.
State-enforced homosexuality might not come around until 2070, in terms of the government forcing adult men to engage in sodomy with one another.
But state-enforced child transgenderism is already here.
And it is enabled, of course, by these horrendous creatures known as White single moms.
Six-year-old James is caught in a gender identity nightmare. Under his mom’s care in Dallas, Texas, James obediently lives as a trans girl named “Luna.” But given the choice when he’s with dad, he’s all boy — his sex at birth.
In their divorce proceedings, the mother has charged the father with child abuse for not affirming James as transgender, has sought restraining orders against him, and is seeking to terminate his parental rights.
She is also seeking to require him to pay for the child’s visits to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations, which may include hormonal sterilization starting at age eight.
When his mother, a pediatrician, took James for counseling, she chose a gender transition therapist who diagnosed him with gender dysphoria, a mental conflict between physical sex and perceived gender. James’ precious young life hinges purely on the diagnosis of gender dysphoria by a therapist who wraps herself in rainbow colors, affirms the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, and dismisses evidence to the contrary. Remove the “rainbow” from James’ diagnosis, and it crumbles under the weight of the criteria for the diagnosis of gender dysphoria.
Pics of the mother are floating around:
She works with other peoples kids… yeah, this woman is a monster, no doubt.
And it was of course a Jewish therapist who enabled the abuse with her “diagnosis” of transgenderism.
Where. Is. The. Father?
Meanwhile, Dad isn’t seeing signs of gender dysphoria. In the father’s home, James appears to be a normal boy and doesn’t identify as a girl. He has a choice of boy’s or girl’s clothes there, and he chooses to dress as a boy. The fact that James changes gender identity depending on which parent is present makes the diagnosis of gender dysphoria both dubious and harmful.
The transition therapist has observed that James is not consistent, insistent, or persistent in the desire to become “Luna.” For example, a dossier filed with the Dallas court says that, under the skilled eyes of the therapist, the child was presented two pieces of paper, one with the word “James” and one with the word “Luna,” and asked to pick the name he preferred. When the appointment only included his mother, James selected Luna, the name and gender he uses at his mother’s home and in his first-grade classroom. When the appointment was only with his father, however, James pointed to the boy name James, not the girl name.
When James is away from his mother, he consistently rejects the idea that he is “Luna girl” or that he wants to be a girl. Because the court prohibits dad from dressing James as a boy or from teaching him that he is a boy by sharing religious or science-based teachings on sexuality, dad presents James with male and female clothing options and James always chooses, even insists on, his boy clothes. Dad told me, “James violently refuses to wear girl’s clothes at my home.” This is not a sign of gender dysphoria.
Eyewitness accounts from friends corroborate dad’s observations of James preferring to be a boy. Bill Lovell, the senior pastor of Christ Church Carrollton, wrote: “Based on the three occasions I’ve spent time with him, I’d say he acts and looks unmistakably like a healthy six-year-old boy. … I am praying for James, an average six-year-old boy, a sweet-natured, intelligent, lovable and at this point particularly vulnerable young man, caught up in a titanic clash of worldviews.”
Pray harder, priest.
You don’t even condemn this Satanic evil happening right under your nose. Nothing about that statement indicates to me skin in the game or anything approaching righteous condemnation.
Just sad mewling and wringing of hands.
I suppose we should thank God that the priest sided with the man at all. Nowadays, I half-expect the “priests” to side with the tranny agenda than not in the name of “love” or something equally vague.
And what is this nonsense about courts forbidding the father to tell his son he’s a boy?
Really sick stuff at work here, lads.
Will normie dads being forced to pay for their young boys’ transition by unhinged thots and Jew-controlled courts be enough to wake people up?
I sure hope so.
But this is the condition that the White man has been reduced to.
Again to recap: this man’s whore ex-wife is destroying his progeny, clearly out of a desire to take revenge on him (and presumably just a general hatred of men), and the Jewdicial system is helping her. The Church is too poz’d to help this man and the State will force him to pay for the absolutely disgusting elective chemical castration procedure that the mother has planned for his son…
If we aren’t living in some dystopian Talmudic tyranny, I don’t know what else to call this state of affairs.