September 17, 2019
Jewish MIT scientist Richard Stallman has been around for a long time and that, combined with the fact that he’s not female, means that it’s time for him to fade away and let mongrel women of color burn everything to the ground and build something better from the ashes.
An MIT scientist who appeared to defend Jeffrey Epstein stating that his victims were almost certainly ‘entirely willing’ as the ‘most plausible scenario’ has resigned from his post.
Richard Stallman, a computer scientist considered to be one of the most influential in his field, was quizzed over his stance on the now-deceased financier’s actions after he made a series of bizarre comments captured in leaked emails revealed by a graduate.
Stallman sent out an email on Monday explaining his sudden departure:
‘I am resigning effective immediately from my position in CSAIL at MIT,’ he wrote. ‘I am doing this due to pressure on MIT and me over a series of misunderstandings and mischaracterizations.’
Engineering alumna Selam Jie Gano shared a blog post that called for the immediate removal of Stallman who was a visiting scientist at the school.
She revealed correspondence that appeared to show his belief that there was no wrongdoing by Epstein nor another alleged attacker Marvin Minsky, who worked at MIT.
This is what it takes to effectively fight the patriarchy:
Selam Jie Gano
Achievement and merit mean nothing if female feelings are hurt in the process.
See, women are feelings-based creatures. They don’t really burn calories, which is why they all get fat when they eat any food at all. Feelings is what they use for energy, so hurting their feelings is literally a terrorist attack on their food supply and if the attack is public and able to starve more than one women, then it can be even considered genocide through the spread of famine.
This is serious.
If we use our words to hurt women’s energy supply, they won’t be able to contribute all the things that they’ve been contributing to our modern world thanks to their empowerment, like herpes, their selfies and PowerPoint presentations.
In the emails, Stallman elaborated that Giuffre’s ‘willingness’ to commit the sex acts was ‘the most plausible scenario’ to why it happened.
He later reportedly added: ‘It is morally absurd to define ‘rape’ in a way that depends on minor details such as which country it was in or whether the victim was 18 years old or 17.’
Talking about ‘child pornography’ he allegedly wrote: ‘It might be an image of a sexually mature teenager that any normal adult would find attractive. What’s heinous about having such a photo?‘
I’ll tell you what’s heinous about it.
When you are a year older than women by a year or more, any kind of sexual interaction with her is rape because there is a power imbalance that works in your favor.
Knowledge is power and the more time you’ve been around the more power you absorbed from the environment (which is a social construct), and actually, as a man, you’re physically stronger than women due to biology so you should just not even try anything sexual with them, ever, because it will always be rape.
Having sex with women is just creepy anyways. Why would you use them for reproduction instead of the obvious reason they exist, which is to contribute their smarts to fields created by men such as science and technology?
Food for thought.