UK: Stupid Bitch Who was “Raped” for Years by Paki and Had Two of His Kids Complains He’s Been Given Child Visitation Rights

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
December 3, 2018

I do not accept the mainstream narrative of the “grooming gang” phenomenon. I look at the right-wing attempt to use “oh my gosh-golly, these victimized young sluts” as about as useful as their attempt to fight the Jewish agenda by allying with Jews.

It is of course the same people doing both these things.

The reality of the “grooming” scandal is that a conquering people are taking the women of the conquered – the same thing that has happened in every situation of conquest ever in history. When the Spanish took Aztlán, the locals were just dropping off entire brigades of virgins to the conquering soldiers.

“To the victor go the spoils.”

While technically the British haven’t officially surrendered their sovereignty to Islam, they have backed down so much that women are able to pick up on the reality of the power dynamics instinctively. They want to fuck the winners – they are not helpless victims.

None of them talks about being kidnapped. But somehow it is “rape.”

I don’t care how old a bitch is, if she is sexually mature, she understands when men are sexually interested in her, and she doesn’t go to a room with them alone unless she’s down to fuck.

That’s the other thing – these are not “pedophiles.” That word has a specific clinical meaning that doesn’t just mean “man having sex with girl under the age of consent.” It means “attraction to pre-pubescent children.”

Note: The reason they started using the term "pedophile" to describe sexual interest in early-teenagers was due to homosexuals preying on pubescent boys. They needed a word to distinguish the "good homosexuals" from the "bad homosexuals," so they started calling the ones who got caught with early teenage boys "pedophiles."

So these Pakis are: Not rapists. Not pedophiles.

Sorry, white knights.

All these princesses of yours being used by these Moslem men are just run-of-the-mill stupid whores. They’re not victims that need saving.

The victims here are the men who are having their women stolen from them by an invading army that their government has sided with against their own people.

When you play into this whole narrative that these sluts are victims, you accept that this is an issue of “predatory men,” rather than “conquering army.”

I’m not saying “never do the muh victimized children” bit – using that kind of narrative strategically can be useful sometimes. But don’t you yourself believe it. Understand that women have no allegiances as a group or as individuals. They will always side with those with the power (those who they perceive to have power, technically, but they are pretty good at figuring that one out).

It is a LULZFEST that one of these stupid bitches who went off to be the concubine of a Paki conqueror and then when she was used up and old claimed he raped her is now being forced to allow him to see the kids.

No white man would be allowed this if he’d been accused of rape by the stupid bitch, which just shows once again that white women are now well below haji men in the progressive stack.

Daily Mirror:

A woman preyed on by paedophiles as a schoolgirl today claims she was ordered to let a man who repeatedly raped her have access to her child.

The woman was 14 when she says she was targeted by a man in the Telford sex grooming scandal.

She fell pregnant twice and says she was warned she faced arrest unless she allowed the man to see the youngster.

Her story comes days after Rotherham mum Sammy Woodhouse told how a man who raped her was also offered parental rights over her child.

Last night, police said lessons had been learned from the Telford victim’s ordeal.

But a second case in only a matter of days will raise concerns as to how many more women and children may have been similarly affected.

The victim – who we are calling Alison to protect her identity – said: “This has been happening for years and it’s an absolute disgrace.

“I was forced to take my child to a contact centre to see my abuser, where I had to sit across from him. He wanted to hurt me by targeting the thing I loved most in the world.

“It was just another way of trying to control me. Despite the fact I’d repeatedly tried to tell police and social services what was going on, the court allowed him to see my child.

“I was told I would be held in contempt and arrested if I didn’t take him to the contact centre.

“They made me feel like I was the one in the wrong. I was terrified I’d go to jail.

“The whole thing was extremely traumatic. It gave my child nightmares for years.

“It seems like the rights of victims always come second to the rights of perpetrators. The system re-traumatises victims like me. It allows for further emotional abuse.”

Protip: any time you hear that sob story nonsense from a woman, it is always bullshit.

This is:

  • “Pedophile” “raped” her when she was 14
  • She was having sex with him for years, giving birth to children twice
  • Then, all of the sudden, it became rape and a “grooming” scandal

Rape is Real, “Consent” is a Dumb Legal Fiction

Women do get raped by Moslems, of course. They grab them on the street, punch them, rape them. That is the only actual kind of rape that exists: violent rape involving force.

It’s very easy to spot a rape. A woman can bite a man, she can scratch him, she also has enough strength in her legs to make intercourse difficult if she is trying to do so, so she is always going to show signs of having been beaten.

This whole “consent” concept is designed to take responsibility off of women and put it on men. That includes this “age of consent,” which is a legal fiction saying that a woman can only have sex and have it not be rape with a man over 18 if she is over 16. A girl who is 15 can have sex with a boy who is 17 and have it not be rape, but when he turns 18 it becomes rape.

I am not some libertarian who supports abolishing the age of consent so as to allow guys in their 30s to have sex with 14-year-olds. I think we can all probably agree that is not good for society.

However, the reality of the age of consent is that it was created by women in order to prevent child marriage, not to prevent the alleged sexual exploitation of young sluts.

All throughout human history and the history of every other mammal, the appropriate age for sex was “after the first menstruation.” However, unless you were a hooker, sex outside of marriage was pretty much illegal in any civilized society. So this wasn’t a situation where inexperienced sluts were being taken advantage of by straight-up playas. This was a society where there were protections for women, because women were rightly viewed as a valuable commodity due to their unique ability to create children after being stuffed with a sticky white goo.

It was historically understood that women were worthless for working, given that they are so stupid and physically weak. So there was not any reason to not get them pumping out babies as soon as they were able. Furthermore, though women do not have the same sex drive as men or anything even approaching it (and anyone who tries to say otherwise is a liar and a trickster), they do have a sex drive and most of them will have sex outside of marriage if they are not married off quickly.

Most girls now lose their virginity in the first year of high school, which is pretty much when they’ve just hit the age of sexual maturity. Then she goes on to fuck God only knows how many guys before turning 28 and attempting to capture a man and force him to father a child. During the time she is serially fucking men, she is also serially fucking up men’s lives by invading male zones in school and work, where she provides absolutely zero value, and is a drain to all forced to interact with her.

So you have a system which:

  • Embraces female hedonism in the extreme in the name of “liberation”
  • Does not value a woman’s virginity
  • Causes women to allegedly feel like they’re being abused
  • Leaves many men without wives, often without even casual sex, as women will all have sex with the same small percentage of attractive men while organizing to ban prostitution
  • Causes unhappiness in females
  • Leads to female obesity
  • Spreads venereal disease
  • Does not produce families, instead causing people to be isolated and atomized
  • Destroys the school system and workplace by filling it with horrible women who have no abilities and make all sorts of demands and threats
  • Results in old and infertile women complaining that their existence has no purpose after they spent their child bearing years on hedonism

This situation is absurd, and it ties back to why we are being conquered by savages in the first place: in a spiritual sense, we have lost our connection to the order of nature, and we are collapsing under the weight of our own high-mindedness. The savage brown hordes are simply an outward manifestation of our own inner sickness.

The order of nature is the order of nature, and if white people refuse to stand up and fight, then they deserve to die, because that is the way nature works.

Join the discussion at TGKBBS