January 28, 2019
What I'm really up to, apparently https://t.co/zafF7tNycq
— Jordan B Peterson (@jordanbpeterson) January 26, 2019
Dr. Jordan Peterson has been blown the fuck out in a video so much he felt the need to retweet it to keep an aloof image. He was later challenged to a duel.
I hereby formally challenge you to a debate, Jordan Peterson.
Here's your chance to "give me an education". pic.twitter.com/CGSHHtam4J
— ☨ Resurrection Europa 🍁 (@WolfishHead) January 26, 2019
We can imagine his response.
Dr. Jordan Peterson is one of the most dangerous characters in the culture wars. He’s a chameleon, an enemy who succeeds in tricking our people into thinking he’s guiding them through the right path and towards the right destination while actually driving them to the slaughterhouse after anesthetizing them with penis-washing and room-cleaning tactics.
Watch the video, if you can. I made a transcript in case you prefer to read.
A documentary exposing Jordan Peterson’s agenda to subvert and destroy the rising political right wing, and neutralize European nationalism.
This video completely exposes Peterson’s anti-White agenda and his strategy for implementing it. Any Peterson fans who are not beyond saving will be deprogrammed by watching this video.
Jordan Peterson’s primary goal is to neutralize the political right and White identity. He does not care about the Marxist take over of our nations, in fact he was hired by the United Nations to help usher it along. Peterson’s only reason for stepping into the limelight was because he saw a massive right wing backlash fomenting, and realized it was going to destroy the left.
His job is to implement “plan B”, to steer the rising tide of nationalism into an impotent cul-de-sac of centrist individualism, giving our enemies just enough time to tip the demographic balance of our countries so that our destruction is sealed.
Peterson is explicitly targeting young White males for indoctrination with an insidious political ideology he calls radical individualism. He has created a pseudo-religion self-help cult; he is delivering his ideology to the disaffected youth by combining it with a self-help regimen wrapped in empty religious metaphor.
While our enemies are working tirelessly to destroy our nations in a ruthlessly calculated and organized fashion, Jordan Peterson is brainwashing a generation of young White men to be atomized individuals who perceive group cooperation based on ethnic identity and nationality as the height of evil.
And in the process of doing so, Peterson and his friends are making untold millions of dollars.
Everyone that doesn’t think that Jordan Peterson is toxic trash should watch the above video by Resurrection Europa or read my transcript below.
Share the video and/or this article. People should know.
Transcript below. Typos are my own
“I don’t think that the Caucasians let’s say should revert to being white. I think that’s a bad idea, it’s a dangerous idea.”
“What the hell “pride”? What’s that? That’s not the right response.”
“I think I understand what’s going on with the kek boys and with Pepe a hell of a lot better than the people do who are you know casual observers of it because I’ve actually studied it.”
“Starting to produce an extraordinarily dangerous counter position.”
“It’s the alt-right that’s part of it, it’s the kekistania, it’s this Pepe thing, it’s-”
“I mean when I first saw the Frog I mean the Pepe frog I really recoiled from it.”
(Peterson is asked a question.) “More recently what has gone wrong with the right?”
“Well where? It’s threatening to go too far in identitarian Europe, that’s for sure.”
“With the people in Europe who are turning to a regressive nationalism as an alternative to to the current state of chaos.” [does Jewish esoteric hand-waving subliminal programming]
“Many people write me from the right or from from no from the fringes of the radical right say saying precisely that listening to my lectures stop them from going all the way.”
Just what exactly is Jordan Peterson endgame? It’s been just over two years now since he first appeared on the scene.
“I also said I wouldn’t mouth the words of the ideologically possessed and that was with regards to gender neutral pronouns.”
At first everyone thought he was just a brave University professor who had had enough of the cultural Marxist garbage that has taken over our society, that he’d snapped when the Canadian government announced it was going to legally mandate calling people xhim xher and xhiself.
Peterson came out of the gate with some vicious rebukes of the political left and even called them what they are: cultural Marxists. But it didn’t take long for Peterson to begin showing his true colors. Nearly at the same time he was thrust into the spotlight for defying the social justice clique at the University of Toronto. Peterson began positioning himself to evangelize a very specific demographic: young white males.
What followed after fall of 2016 was a meteoric rise to fame at the hands of the mainstream media which they made every effort to disguise as being organic. Soon thereafter his mission became plain to see.
Jordan Peterson’s primary goal is to neutralize the political right.
There are a large number of people who believe that Peterson is a force for good because he has criticized left-wing politics and cultural Marxism. However, what was his motivation for doing so? What was the straw that broke the camel’s back and caused Peterson to go public with his objections to left-wing politics?
Did Jordan Peterson choose to sound the alarm at any point during his decades-long career as he witnessed the cultural Marxist infiltration of academia transform hundreds of thousands of students into useful idiots?
No, he did not.
Did Jordan Peterson choose to alert the world to the danger of the cultural Marxist subversion of the world governments as he worked at the United Nations helping them write a Marxist document that outlined their plans for creating equality of outcome inside of and between every country on Earth?
No, he didn’t.
On the surface it might seem like his primary concern was the encroachment on the liberties of freedom of speech with his activism debut consisting of a YouTube video he published in the fall of 2016 where he expressed his refusal to speak to preferred pronouns of transsexuals and his objection to Canadian federal legislation mandating speech of that nature. However, very shortly after doing so, Jordan Peterson gave an interview with the Canadian State-run media broadcaster the CBC in which he stated: “I can tell you one thing that I’m very terrified of, and you can think about this. I think that the continual careless pushing of people by left-wing radicals is dangerously waking up the right wing. So you can consider this a prophecy from me if you want. Inside the collective is a beast and the Beast uses its fists. If you wake up the Beast then violence emerges. I’m afraid that this continual pushing by radical left wingers is going to wake up the Beast.”
Peterson expressed his Terror at the realization that he had had that the takeover of Western academia, the media, and governments by cultural Marxists was catalyzing a response by the political right.
“Part of the reason that I landed in the political hot water that I landed in last year was because I was increasingly aware that this process of polarization was going to take place and that the continual – in my estimation anyways – the continual clawing of new ground underneath a radical leftist rubric especially in the universities is starting to produce an extraordinarily dangerous counter position.”
His analysis was that the policies an aggressive dogma being churned out by the political left were being done in a careless manner that was leading to what he believed would culminate in the political left being neutralized by the right wing. This is the real reason why Peterson decided he needed to step on to the public stage. Not because he wants to dismantle cultural Marxism but because he realized that the political left’s current strategy for achieving their goals is in the process of backfiring spectacularly.
(Brett Weinstein, “Anti-Racist” professor of biology) “What’s going on on the left is a bit of a new twist what you have is a coalition of different tribal identities that aren’t large enough to marshal a force on their own and so they’re united and together they are a formidable force but what’s going to happen is that’s a that’s an unstable entity at the point that that force gains power it’s going to come apart as the internal dynamics rip it up. It’s not capable of restraining the version that recurs on the right, the version that does manifest as as white nationalism, that version is stable because it does represent an actual population that has an evolutionary basis for remaining cohesive.”
Jordan Peterson spent the last two decades of his career watching academia become infested to the gills with Marxist intellectuals, watching as hundreds of thousands of students were radicalized by their propaganda, watching as their rhetoric and demands became more and more extreme while he sat back idly and did nothing.
Remember also that Peterson proudly worked at the United Nations from 2009 until 2012 for George Soros’ Protege Jim Bosley where he helped draft a cultural Marxist document that outlined how the Western world’s wealth must be redistributed to the third world and how the West must also accept and subsidize illegal immigration from the third world.
At no point in Peterson’s career including while working at the United Nations did he feel the need to sound the alarm about the cultural Marxists takeover of Western institutions. What spurred Peterson to action was not only his realization that the methodology by which the political left was implementing its revolution was triggering an organic reaction but that that reaction was fully capable of and likely to succeed in implementing a final solution to the Marxist problem.
“And your point Brett that the radical right actually is more powerful once they get organized is a really good one because there’s no fractionation.”
“It’s more stable”
“You bet. And they have all the guns. That’s another thing to think about.”
And so Jordan Peterson decided to attempt to strangle the fledgling right wing in its cradle. He proceeded to deploy a sophisticated attack disguised cunningly as a centrist rebuke of political extremes that in reality was a message of reformation to the left and what he intended to be a killing blow to the right.
Stratagem: accuse whites of playing Marxist identity politics
One of Peterson’s most substantial achievements has been the instantiation in the minds of his followers the belief that Europeans working together to resist their collective dispossession and extermination is no different than Marxist identity politics. Any concerted effort made by whites as a group to resist dispossession by progressive government policies or by mass immigration is condemned by Peterson as being a manifestation of identity politics.
“The French intellectuals had to admit that communism was a bad deal by the by the end of the 1960s and what happened was that there they played a sleight-of-hand game in some sense and rebranded themselves under the post-modern guys and that’s where identity politics came from.”
According to Peterson identity politics are when a group identifies itself as being oppressed by another group and demands that the group that is oppressing them give up their wealth and power for redistribution amongst the oppressed group.
“And so they started to play a sleight of hand and instead of pitting the proletariat, the working class against the bourgeois. They started to pit the oppressor the oppressed against the oppressor and that opened up the avenue to identifying any number of groups as oppressed and oppressor and to continue the same narrative under a different name.”
Some may believe that when Peterson claims whites are playing identity politics he is in fact describing any form of politics that aims to advance the interests of European people as a group. However in reality Peterson has in fact tried to construct a narrative in which whites are literally trying to define an oppressed-oppressor dichotomy to pursue Marxist identity politics. In the spring of 2018 Peterson published a short article on his blog entitled “On the so-called Jewish Question.” In that article he wrote:
“Why do the reactionary conspiracy theorists even bother? This is a straightforward matter. If you’re misguided enough to play identity politics, whether on the left or the right, you require a victim (in the right wing case European culture or some variant) and a perpetrator (Jews). Otherwise you can’t play the game.”
So whenever Peterson dismisses and condemns Europeans is playing toxic identity politics for working together to put an end to mass immigration that is rendering them a minority in their own countries or for working together to put an end to the Marxist subversion of their nations that’s hell-bent on incrementally dispossessing them he is in fact making the claim that those Europeans want nothing more than to play the victim and demand redistribution of power from Jews to themselves. It is with this sleight of hand that Peterson falsely equates White’s wanting to protect the demographic destiny of their own countries with totalitarianism, evil, and danger.
Peterson’s fallacy here is plainly revealed when one considers the fact that both the USA and Canada both before World War two were classical liberal democracies that shed blood to defeat totalitarian regimes and both countries strictly enforced the demographic character of their countries with immigration laws that nearly exclusively permitted European immigration only. Furthermore, when Peterson differentiates between men and women, it is no different than someone differentiating between races. It is a form of identity politics that is based on objective biological reality rather than any kind of ideology and is thus the antithesis of Marxist class warfare identity politics.
Having established that White’s protecting their nations and the future of their children from certain destruction is automatically tantamount to the instantiation of some flavor of totalitarian regime, Peterson’s next objective was to undermine the psychological foundations of European identity itself.
Stratagem: psychopathologyze and deconstruct white identity
Peterson frequently uses his position of authority as a psychologist to psychopathologyze white identity. More than once he has referred to whites who desire to organize together to protect their group interests as “pathological.” At other times he likes to chastise whites for committing the sin of racial pride deeming it as well to be a pathology.
During a talk Peterson was confronted with a quote from Canadian historical sociologist and professor at the University of New Brunswick Ricardo Duchesne. In the quote Duchesne argued that for the underlying spirit of individualism to be preserved in the West, European people themselves must be preserved, arguing that individualism was a trait that seems to be inherent to European peoples, concluding that Europeans must therefore take pride in their ethnic identity and heritage as a means of self preservation, and therefore as a means of preserving the spirit of individualism itself.
Rather than addressing the actual premises and conclusion of Duchesne’s argument, Peterson went on a tirade about how ethnic pride is sinful and unacceptable, casting scorn upon Duchesne and other whites who dare to take pride in their heritage and culture.
“That’s nothing to be proud of, that’s something to tremble before, to take on as a an ethical burden and not to wave a flag for how wonderful you are that you happen to have the same skin color as some of the people who thought that up. It’s not the right response.”
Peterson’s chastisement of Europeans who take pride in their heritage and culture is based on the absurd assumption that any who do so are trying to literally take personal credit for the achievements of their ancestors.
“So you don’t get to feel pride about that. I feel I feel like I have something to live up to. That’s not the same thing man, and so these right-wingers and this it’s like ‘look what we’ve done’ it’s like no it’s not you that did that. That’s something, man. You got a you’re going to have your act together before you would dare to say ‘well that was me’ it’s like yeah sure sure it was you. Yeah right. No.”
The reality of course is that pride in one’s heritage culture and civilization is not in fact hubristic pride but one of pride of ownership, an emotion that engenders the very deep sense of responsibility and appreciation that is necessary to preserve those things. The very feelings that Peterson claims should be felt in place of pride.
At some point Peterson declared that the goal of what he calls the radical right – his disparaging term for European people who wish to cooperate with one another to protect their nations from certain destruction – is to cultivate unearned identity and the glories of the past.
What Peterson is doing here is in fact paving the way for the most extreme forms of egalitarianism since one cannot control their DNA or their heritage nor can one control their environment, the person one is cannot be earned. This is the same argument that is used by those who argue for equality of outcome. For example, they will argue that since intelligence is either largely determined by genetics or the environment, it is an advantage that is not earned and therefore measures must be put in place to mitigate that unfair, unearned advantage. What Peterson is actually saying is that whites have no rights to their own identity based on their heritage since they did not work to earn who their parents or ancestors were.
“You’re using your unearned…” [pause]
Peterson wanted to say “unearned privilege” referring of course to white privilege but realized his error and began racking his brain for a synonym.
“The unearned gift that’s been granted to you as a source of personal pride in your accomplishments due to your skin. It’s like no, not good, not a good argument.”
Just as the cultural Marxists do, Peterson likes to deconstruct the white race down to nothing more than the level of melanin in one’s skin.
“The other thing about the whole angry young white men thing is that my my angry young white men followers are a hell of a lot less angry and a hell of a lot less white than they would have been if they wouldn’t have been following me because one of the things you know I’ve had many many letters from from young men who’ve also said that they had been attracted to their to the you know to the more dogmatic end of the of the right more dogmatic right wing end of the political spectrum and that listening to my videos has been exactly what’s kept them more or less in the middle.”
Deconstructing whiteness – as the cultural Marxists call it – is something that Peterson loves to do at every opportunity.
(Noel Ignatiev. Professor, Massachusetts School of Arts.) “My concern is is doing away with whiteness”
“If you abolish slavery you abolish slave holders in the same way if you abolish racial oppression you do away with whiteness.”
“Whiteness is an identity that arises entirely out of oppression.”
“Whiteness is not a culture, it’s not a religion, it’s not a language, it’s simply an oppressive social category.”
In a tweet to evolutionary psychologist Kevin MacDonald in late 2017 Peterson posed the classic cultural Marxist question: “How do you define white?”
“Who’s white exactly? Like where how do you draw these distinction?”
Even going so far as to make the absurd declaration that biological organisms do not have an interest in the propagation of their DNA into the future.
There's so many errors in this reply that's it's difficult to know where to begin. 1st, no one has a "genetic interest in their race." That's not how it words. 2nd, how do you define white? What color do you think the Iraqis are? Or the Iranians (Aryans — see the connection?) https://t.co/M1b7TvsLZZ
— Jordan B Peterson (@jordanbpeterson) November 28, 2017
While some may try to argue that Peterson’s primary concern as was trying to prevent society from being stabilized by what he calls tribalism or identity politics, it is clear that when it comes to Europeans Peterson’s motives go far beyond simply warning about the dangers of group identity. He has declared that white identity itself is a mental illness and not only that but that the white race itself is a fiction just as the cultural Marxists do, the people who he claims to oppose.
The very hint of a white individual taking pride in their heritage causes Peterson to lapse into a venomous tirade of shaming and castigation. All of this is fueled by his profound fear that if White’s unite in solidarity to protect themselves and the future of their children, it will somehow lead to the total destruction of Western civilization.
“I think it’s genocidal in its ultimate expression. I think it will bring down our civilization if we pursue it.”
Stratagem: combine self-help advice, political ideology, and religion
“Clean up your room.”
Peterson has woven a complex psychological mind trap in the form of a political ideology disguised as a self-help regimen wrapped in the religious metaphor.
“Ideologies are fragmented religions essentially they used the same symbolic understructure but they only tell part of the story.”
Despite Peterson’s assertion that ideology itself is the root of all evil and that ideology must therefore be rejected in favor of the righteous path of the individual, he is ironically by doing so pushing his own ideology that he himself calls radical individualism.
(Interviewer) “Dr. Wolpin, what was the adverse effect of the Frankfurt School on the world?”
(Miles Wolpin, PhD of Political Science / Dr. of Jurisprudence) “Well, I would say if we looked at our own country and to a lesser degree perhaps Western Europe, we live in an era today when patriotism, defense of our own nationality, independence, sovereignty, are all under attack. […] To paint middle-class morality as repressive, to paint authority within the family, outside the family, as repressive. To promote personal liberation or what we might call radical individualism.”
(Dr. Jordan Peterson) “I don’t see any alternatives than the than the radical individualism that’s predicated on these deep stories that characterizes the West. It’s the right answer.”
(Miles Wolpin, PhD of Political Science / Dr. of Jurisprudence) “In short to foment the rebellion of youth against traditional morality and authority structures in their society. Something we can see as diffuse through our society today.”
This political ideology of his is inextricably in meshed with his self-help advice whereby he admonishes people to clean their rooms and set their life in order. According to Peterson those who do not adhere to his political ideology of radical individualism fail to do so due to suffering from a pathological personality defect of some kind stemming from a refusal to clean their rooms and bear the cross of individual responsibility.
The average Peterson fan is totally incapable of separating the in itself benign self-help advice from Peterson’s political ideology. The result is that those who follow his ideology end up in a perpetual state of masturbatory self-improvement perceiving those who cooperate together in groups based on some set of shared normative values as being psychologically damaged and morally inferior. They end up perceiving any criticism of Peterson’s politics as a personal attack on their efforts to improve themselves and as an attack on the man whom they see as having been instrumental to their self-improvement or salvation.
All of this closely matches the patterns of a cult with Peterson’s followers acting based on strong emotions rather than logic to staunchly defend their charismatic cult leader and his ideology of radical individualism.
(Sam Harris vs. Jordan Peterson, Vancouver, Unknown Man) “Look at the audience it’s mostly European men and a few women very few people from minority backgrounds or so called minorities. There’s very few Asians, very few Chinese, actually I didn’t see any Chinese at all, maybe a couple of [unintelligible], uh no Arabs and no blacks, uh so what does this tell you? It tells you those people feel that something is not right. Those people feel that something is missing, that their needs are not met and everybody else’s needs are met because they’re not here or they don’t care.”
In retrospect it is plainly evident that Peterson made an effort to market himself and his cult to young white males from the very beginning. In the fall of 2016 Peterson attempted to subvert the memetic culture by intentionally associating himself with Pepe the Frog claiming that spiritual synchronicity had crowned him the “spokesfrog.”
(Man talking to Dr. Peterson) “Oh yeah we saw I mean when I saw the video that you put up was it two days ago now I think yeah two days ago I couldn’t believe it yeah and the next morning I got an email from my brother who also studies symbolism and it’s very a very smart person and he he said does Jordan know he’s incarnating Pepe right now?”
“Yeah well the funny thing is you know I knew about Pepe but what it was I had nothing like that on my mind when I made the video it never even entered my mind that that was an association.”
“As spokesfrog I’m announcing that there’s something polluted about the water in which we’re all swimming and-”
Note how he was careful to position the orange circle on the painting behind him around his head as if it were a divine aura or halo a symbolism that he no doubt intended to convey his status as the divinely appointed “spokesfrog” prophet of the young white males he refers to as the “lost kek boys.”
(Interviewer) “So you’re a prophet?”[Jewish laugh]
“Well well you know wearing a we’re in a new world in many ways because of the reach of social media and so I have this immense multimedia platform.”
The reality is that Jordan Peterson’s self-help advice in the form of “clean your room” is nothing more than a delivery vector for his insidious anti white political ideology. An ideology that he refuses to publicly defend.
Stratagem: exclude the radical right from debate
Many are aware of Peterson’s hypocritical decision to uninvite Canadian journalist Faith Goldie from a free speech event at the Canada Christian College in November of 2017 with his stated reason being that Faith had chosen to associate with someone on the political right whose opinions he disagreed with.
(Audience question) “I understand that faith Goldy was removed from the original August panel because of her podcast with the controversial Daily Stormer after Charlottesville. This seems like a performative contradiction to remove Faith because of one interview while claiming to believe in freedom of speech.”
“She was she was associating with people whose views she should have questioned. It was her journalistic responsibility to question them and as a consequence of that she became too hot a property for us.”
What is less known however is that Jordan Peterson has a personal rule of intentionally excluding people from public debate based on their opinions and points of view.
“We know how to put a box around the extremists on the right. Basically we say oh you’re making claims of ethnic or racial superiority, you’re not part of the conversation anymore.”
“I mean I think the fundamental criteria for drawing boundaries around the rights are claims of racial racial or ethnic superiority that seems to me to be the place where conservatism degenerates into something approximating ethno nationalist fascism, it’s something like that.”
According to Peterson anyone who thinks there is a biological difference between the different genetic groups of human beings must be isolated and excluded from all public debate of any kind. This is beyond hypocritical given that Peterson admitted himself on Stefan Molyneux’s show that there exists large and permanent discrepancies in average IQ between the different racial groups.
“So IQ is a particularly ugly aspect of science because the IQ the IQ literature reveals that which no one would want to be the case which is that there are profound and virtually irremediable differences in people’s cognitive performance and that those differences have a very a very solid biological and heritable basis. No one wants to hear that. They don’t want to hear that it’s biological, they don’t want to hear that it’s heritable, they don’t want to hear it’s permanent, they don’t want to hear that it’s irremediable and that it actually has a practical consequence and no wonder they don’t want to hear it.”
(Stephan Molyneux) “And even worse they don’t want to hear that it differs between genders and ethnicities that is to me one of the most painful things that I’ve ever learned in my life is is this kind of information it is one of the great heartbreaks when it comes to the dream of pure egalitarianism and that is I think even harder it’s an even hotter pill for people to swallow.”
Not only that but Peterson wrote an entire essay about the genetic superiority of Ashkenazi Jews relating to their allegedly having an average IQ one standard deviation above that of Europeans stating that: “Jewish people are over-represented in positions of competence and authority because, as a group, they have a higher mean IQ.”
It’s plainly obvious that Peterson’s decree that any individual who brings up the topic of genetic differences between groups of humans should be ejected from and barred from public debate applies only to whites as does ultimately his decree that tribalism is the height of evil.
“So you’ll notice these sculptures behind me they are made by an artist native artist named Charles Joseph and Charles Joseph is a friend and now a brother of mine as I’ve been inducted into their tribal group.”
Jordan Peterson’s endgame is one in the same as the globalist machine. Peterson is working at the psychological level to inoculate a generation of young white males against racial awareness just as whites are on the cusp of becoming a minority group in their own countries the world over.
While our enemies are waging war against us in a ruthless, calculated, and organized manner Peterson is telling us that we must be individualistic and atomized. He has created an insidious political ideology and is delivering it with a spoonful of sugar to an audience who is hungry for an answer to the destruction that is being wrought upon them. The very destruction that Peterson is working to prevent them from effectively opposing, and he is doing all of this for 30 pieces of silver.
“I make $80,000 a month on patreon, my book is selling about 20,000 copies a week, I have royalties that probably amount to something approximating a dollar 50 on each of those, the tours garner about 35,000 to 50,000 dollars an evening, I have a business that’s generating I don’t know something in the neighborhood of two hundred and two hundred thousand dollars a month for me personally, there’s some other smaller sources of income than that.”
(Interviewer) “And you are making a lot of money out of this”
“Yes, I certainly am, and so are a lot of other people. […] I’m not ashamed of making money it’s very hard to make money.”